Mirrorless camera options
Feb 11, 2017 09:42:17 #
Hi,
I am in the Market for a light weight, interchangeable lens camera that I can use for product photography,and travel.
After a lot of research,I came to the conclusion that a mirrorless camera would be my best option. I tried the Sony A7 series and Fuji XTS and PRO. Then I went to a Leica store and felt just right with a TL (APSC)model( the only frame I can afford).It was simple intuitive,light weight,and with relatively small size lenses.I would have preferred a FF sensor,but I was wondering if the IQ would be "compromised" in spite of Leica's lenses reputation.
I am in the Market for a light weight, interchangeable lens camera that I can use for product photography,and travel.
After a lot of research,I came to the conclusion that a mirrorless camera would be my best option. I tried the Sony A7 series and Fuji XTS and PRO. Then I went to a Leica store and felt just right with a TL (APSC)model( the only frame I can afford).It was simple intuitive,light weight,and with relatively small size lenses.I would have preferred a FF sensor,but I was wondering if the IQ would be "compromised" in spite of Leica's lenses reputation.
Feb 11, 2017 09:44:50 #
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
"...felt just right..." That's a big part of any camera purchase. Regardless of sensor size, you have to be comfortable with the camera. I'm sure the TC won't disappoint.
Feb 11, 2017 09:59:15 #
jerryc41 wrote:
"...felt just right..." That's a big part of any camera purchase. Regardless of sensor size, you have to be comfortable with the camera. I'm sure the TC won't disappoint.
The camera the OP purchased is the Leica TL, not the TC, but the TL is unlikely to disappoint him.
Feb 11, 2017 10:10:03 #
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
The reviews for the TL are very positive, tho the range of available lenses is somewhat limited. I wouldn't be in too big a hurry to stock up on expensive Leica glass; you may see Zeiss and, possibly Voigtländer, offering very good L-mount lenses with excellent build quality at more competitive price levels.
Feb 11, 2017 10:26:09 #
Feb 12, 2017 06:31:06 #
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
Have a close look at the Fujifilm XT2. Great camera
Feb 12, 2017 07:14:52 #
You should really have a close look and the M43 (micro four thirds) range of cameras made by Olympus and Panasonic, these could easily suit your requirements.
Feb 12, 2017 12:44:44 #
There are so many good choices in mirrorless cameras out there. A Leica does not make better pictures than other mirrorless cameras with good glass. I sincerely believe that the prices are too high.
Panasonic and Olympus have the advantage that the lenses of one company fit the bodies of the other. Sony has Carl Zeiss lenses, read expensive but of excellent quality. Panasonic has some lenses made under Ernst Leitz supervision, not that I find them exceptional compared with other pro optics.
The choice is there but I see that you already went Leica.
Panasonic and Olympus have the advantage that the lenses of one company fit the bodies of the other. Sony has Carl Zeiss lenses, read expensive but of excellent quality. Panasonic has some lenses made under Ernst Leitz supervision, not that I find them exceptional compared with other pro optics.
The choice is there but I see that you already went Leica.
Feb 12, 2017 13:55:55 #
For the money check out the yet released Fuji XT-20. This mirrorless camera will be released near the end of February and has the same sensor, focal points and takes 4K video. This new camera has the same processor and almost the same menu as it more sophisticated brother the Fuji XT-2. The Fuji XT-20 is half the price of the XT-2. It lists for $899 without a lens and !,199 with a amazingly sharp 18 to 55/2.8 to 4 zoom. Fuji takes wonderful photos and their lenses are second to none and are priced reasonably.
Feb 12, 2017 15:24:06 #
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
There is nothing wrong with the IQ of either the Leica or the lenses. I might have gone cheaper than Leica (Olympus or Panasonic), but the IQ should not be a problem.
Feb 12, 2017 15:30:38 #
You can get Panasonic/Leica lenses on m4/3.
Try a pen-f, gx-85, or em5ii.
Try a pen-f, gx-85, or em5ii.
Feb 12, 2017 16:48:11 #
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
The Fuji x-t2 is a great camera. In many ways actually better than the Leica. My sweetspot is aps-c. The Sony a6300 that I use is really good. I have a show hung in a gallery right now. About half were shot with my Sony. Even if I had all the money in the world, I don't think I could do better than either the Fuji xt2 or my Sony. The Fuji has been thoroughly reviewed by Ken Rockwell. Rockwell's reviews are very real-world, not technical hots, but what a real photographer needs. http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x-t2.htm While there, you can check out the review of the Sony a6300. http://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/a6300.htm
The Fuji will give you at least as good IQ as the Leica as will the Sony. Leica has been resting on its laurels for a long time. Plastic EVF is an example of that. I chose the Sony over the Fuji for reasons irrelevant to you and this discussion.
Fuji is the number one supplier of optical and camera gear to the Japanese government based on its success in astronomics.
Feb 12, 2017 16:51:41 #
theofanis wrote:
Hi, br I am in the Market for a light weight, inte... (show quote)
I want to add that I stay away from the smaller sensors like 4/3 or the so-called "1 inch" (An industry lie) Printed images degrade quickly over 8x10. I would never consider either Panasonic or Olympus for this reason. They are good cameras and good companies otherwise, but they do not produce printable images, though they may do a good job for the Internet.
Feb 12, 2017 17:17:11 #
Reinaldokool wrote:
I want to add that I stay away from the smaller sensors like 4/3 or the so-called "1 inch" (An industry lie) Printed images degrade quickly over 8x10. I would never consider either Panasonic or Olympus for this reason. They are good cameras and good companies otherwise, but they do not produce printable images, though they may do a good job for the Internet.
You're off your rocker. 20x30 is no issue. You need a different printer.
Feb 12, 2017 20:30:16 #
Ignore what Reinaldokool wrote about micro 4/3rds, he's obviously not speaking from experience...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.