That's pretty funny. First time I was 56. Got it down to 18. Cheers.
melismus wrote:
It appears to me that the site assumes the internet latency time is zero. I live out in the boonies where 'broadband' is a joke title. Some of my results were over 2000 msec--an absurdly long time.
That's funny. You have to allow for the reaction time of the Internet.
Mine were between 224 milliseconds (not human) to very old.
ebbote wrote:
Mine were between 224 milliseconds (not human) to very old.
You must have a very fast Internet connection for that 224 ms time.
HA...242 milliseconds...i'm not human it says lol. Fun, thanks for sharing!
I have ATT U-verse 45 mbs, I want faster, but it cost more money.
jerryc41 wrote:
You must have a very fast Internet connection for that 224 ms time.
Very cool - 30 then 24 then not sure if you're human. I'm 70. Wish all my other functions were like that.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
jaycoffman wrote:
... Wish all my other functions were like that.
I have some functions that I wish were 20 years younger.
Well I'm 65, started with a 74 got down to 26
RobertW
Loc: Breezy Point, New York
Guess i can continue driving- 46 isn't bad for an 82 year old!
282 milliseconds; not sure what that equates into age
ricardo7
Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
I was doing awful; hitting 50s and 60s. Then I did some exercise,
checked my BP (108/59) so that was OK and tried again. Best time
was 25 with most in the high twenties/low thirties. Maybe I need
even more exercise.
Funny! 35 to 44. Not too shabby for an 81 year old I guess.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.