Sealed Records of 43rd
Feb 5, 2017 13:32:35 #
PinOakEO
Loc: NA
What was BHO hiding from America before his e******n?
Will files ever be opened? Maybe he will put them in a bottle from Hawaii & wait 35 yrs for someone in NY - CA - Chicago to find them?
Will files ever be opened? Maybe he will put them in a bottle from Hawaii & wait 35 yrs for someone in NY - CA - Chicago to find them?
Feb 5, 2017 13:45:13 #
Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?
A: No. Many records that p**********l candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.
FULL ANSWER
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier v***l email.
But with President Barack Obama’s ree******n campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in v***l emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/
Any more boguas bs.
A: No. Many records that p**********l candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.
FULL ANSWER
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier v***l email.
But with President Barack Obama’s ree******n campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in v***l emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/
Any more boguas bs.
Feb 5, 2017 13:57:41 #
So what? OK say we do find out that Obummer was born in Kenya or Mars, maybe, or some other out of the U.S. borders; what can be done about it. We know more about Trump in his one month Presidency than we know about Obummer in eight years. The big question is why didn't he give some kind of response instead of ignoring the questions
Feb 5, 2017 14:01:52 #
Feb 5, 2017 14:03:59 #
PinOakEO wrote:
What state was his Social Security card issued?
Who cares. What difference does it make.
When I got my SS number I had to fill out the forums in the state I was in at that time. Not state I was born . Was not issued at birth.
Feb 5, 2017 14:12:05 #
PinOakEO wrote:
What state was his Social Security card issued?
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 required that every dependent age five or older listed on a tax return have their own Social Security number, which led to a spike in demand for Social Security numbers for children at earlier ages. The Social Security Administration developed an enumeration-at-birth process in 1987, which quickly became the way the majority of people apply for Social Security numbers. Now parents indicate on the birth certificate form whether they want a Social Security number assigned to their newborn child. When the state vital statistics office receives the request with the birth registration data from the hospital, it forwards the information to the Social Security Administration and a number and card are issued for the child.
Feb 5, 2017 14:20:14 #
Feb 5, 2017 14:22:06 #
green wrote:
GW Bush...our 43rd President.
Wasn't gonna bring that up till after he rants more. LOL whole threads worthless bs.
Feb 5, 2017 14:24:16 #
PinOakEO
Loc: NA
green wrote:
GW Bush...our 43rd President.
44th! My bad.
SAT: It's sealed now for me!
Feb 5, 2017 14:58:45 #
PinOakEO wrote:
ok... most of that bad s**t happen during P43.44th! My bad.
SAT: It's sealed now for me!
SAT: It's sealed now for me!
Feb 6, 2017 13:00:14 #
Since you wish to defend him maybe you would like to expound on Obama's f**e social security from a state in which he never lived?
http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/275861/
http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/275861/
dirtpusher wrote:
Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”? br A: No. M... (show quote)
Feb 6, 2017 13:16:09 #
It's a nefarious conspiracy! Why would Obama f**e a SS? To what end?
Typo perhaps?
"Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived at the time he applied for his Social Security number in 1977 is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut)."
Typo perhaps?
"Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived at the time he applied for his Social Security number in 1977 is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut)."
Feb 6, 2017 15:01:09 #
The subject of Obama's social security card has been around I believe since his first term. If what you say is true (and I'm not saying it is or isn't} why has ne never had that mess straightened out by now? He certainly has had enough time to do that. Also if he did, why would the news media not have picked up on that and broadcast it? There are just too many unanswered questions about him and his past. Another good one is why no pictures ever surfaced where Michelle was pregnant nor anything about her actually giving birth? I still believe he has and always has had some things he wants to keep hidden.
mwalsh wrote:
It's a nefarious conspiracy! Why would Obama f**e... (show quote)
Feb 6, 2017 16:26:12 #
Huey Driver wrote:
The subject of Obama's social security card has be... (show quote)
It wouldn't matter if he "cleared it up" or not.
The reason........Conservatives wouldn't believe it anyway.
They only believe what they want to believe.
Feb 6, 2017 16:28:50 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.