The Trump supporters will no doubt call it f**e news, as Trump has already done, but calling it f**e doesn't make it f**e. Do you think they will every acknowledge what an absolutely d********g, perverted person Trump is?
The Trump supporters will no doubt call it f**e news, as Trump has already done, but calling it f**e doesn't make it f**e. Do you think they will every acknowledge what an absolutely d********g, perverted person Trump is?
Not openly they won't. Trump even denying the disclosures of the briefings.
Then every news source there is must be f**e they all carrying it..
Nupe nope notta winger here will openly admit trump a perv.
The Trump supporters will no doubt call it f**e news, as Trump has already done, but calling it f**e doesn't make it f**e. Do you think they will every acknowledge what an absolutely d********g, perverted person Trump is?
Your candidate lost..........Resistance is futile..........
The Trump supporters will no doubt call it f**e news, as Trump has already done, but calling it f**e doesn't make it f**e. Do you think they will every acknowledge what an absolutely d********g, perverted person Trump is?
Well then, what would you call it imbecile? The story is based on "unverified" information and reports. So if it is not f**e news, then what is it moron? This story comes from a report PAID FOR by Trump's opposition. You clowns are really desperate aren't you? Here is just one paragraph from this so called news story. It destroys any credibility of the remainder of the story. Even as stupid as you are, you can see that can't you?
"The unverified information regarding the reported Russian activity was gathered over a period of months by a retired British intelligence working under contract first for Trump's Republican opposition and later for Democrats supporting Hillary Clinton, his rival for the presidency, according to The New York Times. The existence of the information, organized as an appendix to the highly classified intelligence briefing, has been known among journalists and officials in Washington but was first publicly reported Tuesday by CNN. Buzzfeed News later published a copy of the unverified documents".
Well then, what would you call it imbecile? The story is based on "unverified" information and reports. So if it is not f**e news, then what is it moron? This story comes from a report PAID FOR by Trump's opposition. You clowns are really desperate aren't you? Here is just one paragraph from this so called news story. It destroys any credibility of the remainder of the story. Even as stupid as you are, you can see that can't you?
"The unverified information regarding the reported Russian activity was gathered over a period of months by a retired British intelligence working under contract first for Trump's Republican opposition and later for Democrats supporting Hillary Clinton, his rival for the presidency, according to The New York Times. The existence of the information, organized as an appendix to the highly classified intelligence briefing, has been known among journalists and officials in Washington but was first publicly reported Tuesday by CNN. Buzzfeed News later published a copy of the unverified documents".
Well then, what would you call it imbecile? The st... (show quote)