Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Deciding between 2 lenses, would love some input
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 9, 2017 07:29:34   #
Jim Bob
 
For all dummies who suggested a lens not mentioned by the OP: start your own thread and push your agenda there.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 07:33:32   #
phlash46 Loc: Westchester County, New York
 
Really? The pot calling the kettle black...

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 07:42:42   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)


You can get the Tamron 160-600mm G2 for about $1400. A lens with very good reviews so far. That's far less than $10,000.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 07:57:15   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)


This might help.

http://photo.net/equipment/150-600_lenses
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/articles/tamron-vs-sigma-150-600mm-the-7-key-differences-48183
https://photographylife.com/nikon-200-500mm-vs-tamron-150-600mm-vs-sigma-150-600mm-c

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 08:14:04   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)


Go for the Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 outstanding lens

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 08:20:56   #
orrie smith Loc: Kansas
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)


I had the Tamron and had problems with it hunting for focus. Sold it and bought the Nikon 200-500 and feel it is a huge improvement.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 08:27:29   #
BuckeyeBilly Loc: St. Petersburg, FL
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)


Here is the link to Nikon's refurbished lenses, to help save with money.
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-store/refurbished-cameras.page#!/tag:8ps:Lenses

Here is one for Tamron and any rebates attached to specific lenses:
http://www.tamron-usa.com/lenses/rebates.php

Here is for Sigma:
https://www.sigmaphoto.com/sigma-outlet/shop-lenses

I suggest you bookmark all 3 for future reference. You're welcome!

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 08:43:06   #
NikonCharlie Loc: Kansas USA
 
Considering the 2 lenses you mention, I'd suggest that the Sigma Sport is better lens. This is based on what I have read, I don't have any first hand experience with these lenses, but the sport is getting serious nods from those that have used both.
Not on your short list, but do consider the Nikon 200-500, great bang for the buck! I get along fantastic with mine and have lots of photos to prove it.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 09:19:02   #
jackpi Loc: Southwest Ohio
 
homefree21 wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fast and sharp but doesn't break the bank. I have looked at some reviews and I am still not sure. I use a Nikon d810 and a d4. Looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 or the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens. I want to shoot wildlife including small animals and insects along with landscape. I use a nikkor 24-70 2.8 and nikkor 14-24 2.8 but really want something long without spending $10,000. Any input would be appreciated.
Hi, I am looking for a long reach lens that is fas... (show quote)

The Tamron 150-600mm G2 lens produces image quality better than the Sigma Contemporary and equivalent to the image quality provided by the more expensive and heavier Sigma Sport. Check out reviews of the Tamron lens on YouTube.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 09:27:36   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
I suggest that you buy the Nikon, Sigma and Tamron, test them rigorously, and then decide for yourself. In respect to the posters, we have more opinions, first and second hand, than facts. Ultimately, you have to live with your decision. I would not be surprised that you find out no single lens has it all, optics, mechanics, focusing, price, and feel, and you pick a lens that does not have it for you.

Good luck and let us know what you decide.

PS I have the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary lens and love it. However, I do not test it against the Tamron and Canon models.

PPS I am currently testing two other lenses. The preliminary results indicate one is lens is noticeably sharper at the short end but beyond that the other lens is better. The second lens has a much nicer user interface. The lenses have other differences with no clear winner. What do I do? This will be a difficult choice.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 09:36:12   #
jimpitt
 
I am very pleased with my Nikkor 18-300 zoom. Lightweight, and no need to change lenses; great advantage for travel. Retail new $999.00. Use on a D500.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 09:37:45   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
f/5.6
jethro779 wrote:
You got an f/4? I only got f/5.6

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 09:50:14   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Both lenses are very good but Sigma seems to have the edge. Those are the comments I have read in reviews.
Quality images will depend more on your techniques than the sharpness of the lens.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 09:52:34   #
Ira
 
I have the Tamron 150-600 G2 and I love it. It's light, sharp and focuses very close (7.2 ft). I had the first version and this is sharp throughout. The older one was slightly soft at 600. This lens is compared to the Sigma Sport, which is heavy, cost more and doesn't focus as close. Tamron also has a 6 year warrantee.
Here is a link with a comparison of the Tamron 150-600 g2 vs. Sigma 150-600mm Sport.
The Nikon is 200-500 and heavy and is inconsistent. Some are good and others aren't sharp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gjxae68EGn0
Also, both the Sigma and the Tamron(TAP) have attachments to do an auto fine tune adjustments and updates online, Nikon doesn't have that feature.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 10:30:38   #
NJphotodoc Loc: Now in the First State
 
Until the new Tamron was released, I would have gone with Sigma, but the new Tamron is getting very positive reviews. My suggestion, if possible, is take your camera body to a store and test drive both. Obviously you can't try a lens all situations, but you'll at least be able to get a feel for both and see which one aligns with your expectations. Good luck!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.