steve_stoneblossom wrote:
It takes a big man...
Now if only that could put the debate to rest, but I know better. In regard to the whole ETTR/EBTR/ERADR matter, you both realize neither of you stands a snowball's chance in hell of convincing the other, no matter who attracts the most disciples, right?
This seems to me a good point at which to respectfully bow out.
'Twould be reasonable were it a disagreement on such as " what is art?" or "what is the meaning of life?" . But misunderstandings on the basic principle of proper raw image data exposure and perceiving the underlying logic of the relationships among maximum available dynamic range, the concept of the brightest available stop of exposure, and the potential tonal and chromatic benefits devolving from the format's bit-depth are not to be dismissed as mere infinitely arguable yet irresoluble subjective matters of faith as opposed to matters of fact and reason.