Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Moon pics
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 15, 2016 10:55:07   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Shellback wrote:
Use the old standby LOONEY 11 RULE:

The “looney 11 rule” states that for astronomical photos of the Moon’s surface, set aperture to f/11 and shutter speed to the (reciprocal of the) ISO film speed (or ISO setting).”

With ISO 100, one sets the aperture to f/11 and the shutter speed to 1/100 or 1/125 second.
With ISO 200, aperture at f/11, set shutter speed to 1/200 or 1/250.
With ISO 400, aperture at f/11, set shutter speed to 1/400 or 1/500.

As blue-ultra mentioned, it's like shooting in the daylight -

If you search the net for moon photography you will find many articles with tips and tricks...
Use the old standby LOONEY 11 RULE: br br The “l... (show quote)


So, I have Lumix FZ200 which doesn't stop down to f/11. What do I do in that case? I like how the 600mm zoom lens brings the moon in, but have not had much success getting pictures of it with the FZ200.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 11:08:54   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Jelisa35 wrote:
I was trying to capture the moon last night and no matter what I tried, the picture was not coming out clear. The moon was just a bright fuzzy circle. Is there a special or specific way to do this? I was using Nikon D3400 70-300 lens. I used different settings and even guided settings but I could not capture it.

Thank you.

Posting a picture would surely help to narrow down the steps needed for you, but from the sounds of it, you just used a too long shutter speed for your shots. The moon is not a still object ( it moves across the sky - a lot quicker than a many people think)!

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 11:14:53   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
speters wrote:
Posting a picture would surely help to narrow down the steps needed for you, but from the sounds of it, you just used a too long shutter speed for your shots. The moon is not a still object ( it moves across the sky - a lot quicker than a many people think)!


Here's an example.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2016 11:27:35   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Jelisa35 wrote:
I was trying to capture the moon last night and no matter what I tried, the picture was not coming out clear. The moon was just a bright fuzzy circle. Is there a special or specific way to do this? I was using Nikon D3400 70-300 lens. I used different settings and even guided settings but I could not capture it.

Thank you.

Posting pictures would surely help to narrow down the steps for you, but by the sound of it, you just used a too long shutter speed for your shots. The moon is not a still subject! It moves across the sky ( a lot quicker than a many people think)!

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 11:29:26   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
It's a good shot. Your settings (f3.2, 1/125 sec) are good except lower your iso from iso-200 to iso-100. You would get more detail. You could also try the shot at 800mm equiv focal length instead of 1200mm. You might get a sharper pic if you are not zoomed out to the max.
Bob

Wingpilot wrote:
Here's an example.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 11:30:08   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
JR45 wrote:
Try manual mode, f/11, s100, ISO 100



Reply
Dec 15, 2016 11:31:10   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Bobspez wrote:
It's a good shot. Your settings are good except lower your iso to iso-100. You would get more detail.
Bob


Thank you. When I took that shot, no doubt I had the ISO set to ISO auto.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2016 12:25:04   #
Djedi
 
JimKing wrote:
You've gotten much good advice on correct moon exposure but be aware that the "super" moon is not visibly larger than a regular old moon. Yes, it is larger but so slight your camera won't notice the difference. The first mention of a "super" moon that I remember was about 2 years ago. As the moon orbits the earth it is sometimes closer and sometimes further away which has been happening forever. A couple of years ago a "news guy" got wind that the moon would be at one of it's closer points during a full moon and gave birth to the "super moon" title. As a photographer all you need is a clear night, don't wait another 30 something years.
You've gotten much good advice on correct moon exp... (show quote)

Hee hee.... right you are Jim.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 12:26:08   #
Djedi
 
JimKing wrote:
You've gotten much good advice on correct moon exposure but be aware that the "super" moon is not visibly larger than a regular old moon. Yes, it is larger but so slight your camera won't notice the difference. The first mention of a "super" moon that I remember was about 2 years ago. As the moon orbits the earth it is sometimes closer and sometimes further away which has been happening forever. A couple of years ago a "news guy" got wind that the moon would be at one of it's closer points during a full moon and gave birth to the "super moon" title. As a photographer all you need is a clear night, don't wait another 30 something years.
You've gotten much good advice on correct moon exp... (show quote)


Right you are Jim!!!

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 12:32:14   #
Djedi
 
Wingpilot wrote:
Here's an example.


That's what I used to get with my FZ150 before post processing. Add contrast and sharpness to taste.

Oh- one more thing. Set exposure correction to -1 or -2 and use spot metering.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 12:56:22   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Jelisa35 wrote:
I was trying to capture the moon last night and no matter what I tried, the picture was not coming out clear. The moon was just a bright fuzzy circle. Is there a special or specific way to do this? I was using Nikon D3400 70-300 lens. I used different settings and even guided settings but I could not capture it.

Thank you.


Sunny 16 rule never ever fails. Then if you do want brighter or darker adjust your exposure. All this in manual. For focus focus on the edge of the moon with af then turn off af and recompense as you desire. All parts of the moon are at infinity so depth of field is not a problem.
This is a very easy and simple way to get good results. From there you can adjust all you want to suit your taste but at least you are in the area of good exposure and good focus.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2016 13:20:01   #
photoman022 Loc: Manchester CT USA
 
JR45 wrote:
Try manual mode, f/11, s100, ISO 100

What he said and try underexposing 1, 2, 3, and 4 stops.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 14:28:36   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Djedi wrote:
That's what I used to get with my FZ150 before post processing. Add contrast and sharpness to taste.

Oh- one more thing. Set exposure correction to -1 or -2 and use spot metering.


Good tip. Hadn't thought of that one.

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 14:31:46   #
Djedi
 
Wingpilot wrote:
Good tip. Hadn't thought of that one.


That's why we're here. : )

Reply
Dec 15, 2016 19:57:54   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Djedi wrote:
That's why we're here. : )


Yup.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.