"Investigating Russia’s role in interfering and with possibly hacking the 2016 p**********l e******n v**e is at the center of the Green Party-led recount effort.
The recount entered a new phase Saturday, when both the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Donald Trump t***sition team issued dueling statements about the need to verify v**es in the three states that gave Trump an E*******l College majority. But beyond their appearances, with Clinton’s campaign saying it would participate in the effort, was a remarkable development: the prospect that the recount will try to investigate the biggest unanswered question h*****g over the e******n beside who won: did Russia take steps to hack the v**e?"
You guys just can't accept the fact that the "skank" lost the e******n. She conceded, you lost, get over it.
Rich
richosob wrote:
You guys just can't accept the fact that the "skank" lost the e******n. She conceded, you lost, get over it.
Rich
They hacked the DNC to help Trump.
Don't you think we should investigate to find out if they hacked the v****g?
"Despite all the news being generated by the change of power underway in Washington, there is one story this week that deserves top priority: Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n. On Tuesday, the director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Michael Rogers, was asked about the WikiLeaks release of hacked information during the campaign, and he said, "This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect." He added, "This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily."
This was a stunning statement that has echoed other remarks from senior US officials. He was saying that Russia directly intervened in the US e******n to obtain a desired end: presumably to undermine confidence in US e******ns or to elect Donald Trump."
BigWahoo wrote:
They hacked the DNC to help Trump.
Don't you think we should investigate to find out if they hacked the v****g?
"Despite all the news being generated by the change of power underway in Washington, there is one story this week that deserves top priority: Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n. On Tuesday, the director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Michael Rogers, was asked about the WikiLeaks release of hacked information during the campaign, and he said, "This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect." He added, "This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily."
This was a stunning statement that has echoed other remarks from senior US officials. He was saying that Russia directly intervened in the US e******n to obtain a desired end: presumably to undermine confidence in US e******ns or to elect Donald Trump."
They hacked the DNC to help Trump. br br Don't yo... (
show quote)
The only they will find is that about half a million dead democrats v**ed in this e******n and a lot more i*****l i*******ts did the same.
Rich
richosob wrote:
The only they will find is that about half a million dead democrats v**ed in this e******n and a lot more i*****l i*******ts did the same.
Rich
I would like to see the proof instead of wild accusations.
BigWahoo wrote:
I would like to see the proof instead of wild accusations.
The same can be said of the supposed Russian hacking fairy tale.
green
Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
Jakebrake wrote:
The same can be said of the supposed Russian hacking fairy tale.
the cons would have come up with something quite a bit more imaginative... perhaps mind-control aliens influencing the e******n
This silliness will go absolutely no where! Mark my words, the left wingers are grasping at straws.
Can you say President Trump?
Jakebrake wrote:
This silliness will go absolutely no where! Mark my words, the left wingers are grasping at straws.
Can you say President Trump?
I don't believe that a recount will change anything.
The head of the NSA says that Russia tried to influence the e******n, don't you think for national security we need to know how far they were able to penetrate our security measures?
"It is a literal crying shame that the mainstream media failed to scream bloody murder over a national security story this week that deserves the highest priority: confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n. Little, if anything, was reported that on Tuesday last, the director of the National Security Agency (NSA), Admiral Michael Rogers, was queried about the release of hacked information during the American general e******n and Donald Trump’s campaign. Admiral Rogers said;
“This was a conscious effort by a nation-state [Russia] to attempt to achieve a specific effect. This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily.”
It is nearly impossible to imagine a more stunning statement and damning indictment coming from the head of the primary United States security agency. Of course, it should not be a revelation; Admiral Rogers’ statement echoed similar remarks from many other senior American officials."
Of course Trump seemed to condone Russian hacking of of the DNC and benefited from it.
BigWahoo wrote:
"It is a literal crying shame that the mainstream media failed to scream bloody murder over a national security story this week that deserves the highest priority: confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n. Little, if anything, was reported that on Tuesday last, the director of the National Security Agency (NSA), Admiral Michael Rogers, was queried about the release of hacked information during the American general e******n and Donald Trump’s campaign. Admiral Rogers said;
“This was a conscious effort by a nation-state [Russia] to attempt to achieve a specific effect. This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily.”
It is nearly impossible to imagine a more stunning statement and damning indictment coming from the head of the primary United States security agency. Of course, it should not be a revelation; Admiral Rogers’ statement echoed similar remarks from many other senior American officials."
Of course Trump seemed to condone Russian hacking of of the DNC and benefited from it.
"It is a literal crying shame that the mainst... (
show quote)
This is no surprise BW, the lame stream media is too busy demonizing Trump to actually do any investigative reporting on this issue. Thus my previous statement, 'this will go nowhere'!
BigWahoo wrote:
"It is a literal crying shame that the mainstream media failed to scream bloody murder over a national security story this week that deserves the highest priority: confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 p**********l e******n. Little, if anything, was reported that on Tuesday last, the director of the National Security Agency (NSA), Admiral Michael Rogers, was queried about the release of hacked information during the American general e******n and Donald Trump’s campaign. Admiral Rogers said;
“This was a conscious effort by a nation-state [Russia] to attempt to achieve a specific effect. This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily.”
It is nearly impossible to imagine a more stunning statement and damning indictment coming from the head of the primary United States security agency. Of course, it should not be a revelation; Admiral Rogers’ statement echoed similar remarks from many other senior American officials."
Of course Trump seemed to condone Russian hacking of of the DNC and benefited from it.
"It is a literal crying shame that the mainst... (
show quote)
Saw a guy on television, this was about 4 to 5 weeks before the e******n, he said that during the the Russian e******n there was some type of disturbance and Putin blamed Clinton who was Secretary of State at the time. The hacks the DNC experienced was payback for Clinton's sticking her nose where it didn't belong.
Rich
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.