dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

FlyingTiger Loc: Tortola, BVI

That is funny.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

yup it is, has trumet diaper in a twist crying for all it worth.

ejrmaine Loc: South Carolina

In the process of recounting the v**es, I hope they verify all v**ers are legal citizen of the USA and are actually alive. That should ensure a Trump victory yet again.

FlyingTiger Loc: Tortola, BVI

You are correct. This will probably end up being a case of "be careful what you ask for".

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

To overturn the reported results of the e******n, Hillary Clinton would have to demand recounts in several states, or all of them. She will be afraid to do that, because if the recount does not show Republican fraud enough to overturn the e******n, Trump will follow through with the threat to prosecute her. Good thing for her that she has not done something really egregious, like lying about a private sex act.

Fat Gregory Loc: Southern New Jersey

You forget her beau... Vince Foster!

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

Fat Gregory]You forget her beau... Vince Foster!

Nagy: If you want to make a crackpot case for the murder, make it. All you have here is the implication. That is totally worthless, very sleazy way to argue.

John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

If this trend holds up, I wonder how many other States will be re-examing their precinct totals. It seems Michigan and Pennsylvania are in the crosshairs. Somebody mentioned the "dead" v**e - they would for Trump as he was the only one talking about rigging. His words were code to them angrys to go c***t.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

First off the. Politicususa article is bulls**t, if precincts were "padding" v**es for Trump I would hope that several persons would be on their way to a court room for a brief stop over before going to jail.

As far as Hillary goes, she has done plenty of egregious things; setting up the private server, exposing this country's classified information to hackers, deleting government records, and beyond that there is always her foundation and pay to play. Now none of this has yet been proven in a court of law, but if there is no there there...... then why should she be afraid of prosecution because if she did nothing wrong then clearly in such a high profile case she would be vindicated.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Here's the proof that at least 4 Wisconsin precincts were padding the v**es for Trump. This is public record and easy to verify. So far, 3 separate counties in Wisconsin have admitted doing this, totaling about 5,000 v**es for Trump that they have subsequently removed, shrinking Trump's lead in Wisconsin from the original 27,257 as reported on November 8, down to 22,525 as revised on November 16. Let's look at just one county to see the shenanigans that were going on there:

A county in Wisconsin named Outagamie County had four precincts in the areas of Cicero, Grand Chute, Bear Creek, and Hortonville which all showed that they had fewer people overall than had v**ed in the p**********l e******n. This instance naturally created quite a stir when people found out, with many claiming, rightly, that fraud was taking place. The precincts quickly adjusted their v****g totals, which removed over a thousand v**es from Donald Trump’s side.

You can see the Grand Chute 1-3 results here. All 1126 extra v**es were for Trump. Clinton’s total stayed the same.

Here are the original totals reported on November 8



Here are the revised totals reported on November 16



Same deal in Hortonville. Trump’s number down by 400+ v**es, Clinton’s unchanged. B****ts cast now matches v**es counted.

Here are the original totals reported on November 8. The numbers display that in 3 precincts in Outagamie County, all won by DT, more v**es were counted for President than cast:



Here are the revised totals reported on November 16



The village clerk of Hortonville - Lynn Mischkerm - offered an explanation to the discrepancy, which didn’t make much sense at the time and under further analysis was proved to be a falsehood.

Here's what she said (http://wbay.com/2016/11/22/discrepancies-in-unofficial-outagamie-county-e******n-results-explained/amp/):

In order to give e******n returns to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office as quickly as possible the Chief Inspector added together the v**es from the e******n machine tapes. An error was made while keying the numbers on the calculator during this process resulting in an incorrect number of v**es reported on E******n night. The official process of tallying the v**es was completed and rechecked. These v**e numbers were recorded and delivered to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office the morning of November 9th. The official tally reflects the accurate v**es in the Village.

To accept this story from Mischkerm, one would have to believe that the same error was made in four different counties, and that same error resulted in Donald Trump receiving more v**es in each instance. Another conundrum is Hillary Clinton’s v**e total did not change before the original numbers were announced, or after they were adjusted due to the Internet’s outrage.

And the scandal continues to grow as more revisions come in throughout the state. So far a total of nearly five thousand Trump v**es in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with. (see the Palmer Report: http://www.palmerreport.com/news/ahead-of-recount-wisconsin-has-already-wiped-out-5000-phony-v**es-for-donald-trump/234/)

Even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump’s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 v**es from the originally reported 27,257. That means 18% of his “lead” has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. Another thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of v**es from Trump, while affirming that Clinton’s v**e total was essentially correct to begin with.

So, Donald Trump has gone from originally having 1,409,467 v**es to now having just 1,404,536 v**es in Wisconsin. In other words, a total of 4,931 v**es were reported for Trump on e******n night that never existed. In contrast Hillary Clinton has gone from 1,382,210 v**es down to 1,382,011 v**es, a difference of less than two hundred v**es. In other words, Wisconsin essentially had Clinton’s v**e total correct all along, but is now acknowledging that nearly five thousand of the supposed v**es for Trump simply never existed. Where did these v**es come from? Who originally padded his numbers and how? If this was indeed due to an organized effort to pad Trump’s v****g totals in various precincts across the state, the recount should fully expose it.

The point to take away from this entire v****g debacle in these little Wisconsin towns is that e*******l f***d was uncovered because they lazily attempted to give Trump an edge and did not anticipate their villainy being discovered. In other areas of the nation it is entirely possible that similar scenarios t***spired, and the individuals involved were smoother in covering their tracks.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Nice Keenan, now if this holds true I hope that we will see the legal system play out and people will go to jail.... I am going to wait and see what happens here but there does seem to be something to be concerned about here.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Poor poor. Blurr . Do yuh have proof of that statement. Or is it running of the bulls......... S**t as usuals.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

See that is the difference between me and you and me and just about any liberal on the site, Keenan presented a strong case that indeed there may have been padding and I acknowledged that, something that you are quite incapable of doing as your response would be some sort of nonsensical blather. If Keenan's graphics prove to be accurate then someone has some explaining to do and I have already stated that I support charges being filed, something else that a liberal would rarely support should their side be caught c***ting, you would simply claim republican conspiracy.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

You a singer blur. Started out comparing you an me, then we have a little bit of Keenan throwed in there, an still hadn't answered my question. So I will have to take it as a no.

Oh forgot to mention all the flap jawinnnn throws in there tooooooo. Lol