Totally done within photoshop.
Nov 22, 2016 19:14:35 #
And with a Jpeg at that! I suppose the raw police will be after me now. "Oh, you have to shoot in raw!" Why? "It doesn't matter where your white balance is set if you shoot in raw!" Really? I have a life. It doesn't really matter. I am laughing all the way to the bank.
Nov 22, 2016 19:20:47 #
maybe you should add a camera into your workflow. although your ability to use ps to create a semi believable face is commendable
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
Nov 22, 2016 19:43:40 #
Nov 22, 2016 21:54:20 #
MissStephie wrote:
Thank you, Steph I have had so much positive response from knowledge people in the arts. These compliments were not on any type of forum either. It will be on a billboard somewhere.I like this. Different & i like different. 
Nov 23, 2016 06:25:15 #
Yeah, this comes from someone (troll alert) who hasn't posted an image since May 2014.
tsilva wrote:
maybe you should add a camera into your workflow. although your ability to use ps to create a semi believable face is commendable
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
Nov 23, 2016 07:30:29 #
tsilva wrote:
And yet it is this kind of crap that sells. Andy Warhol comes to mind.maybe you should add a camera into your workflow. although your ability to use ps to create a semi believable face is commendable
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
Nov 23, 2016 08:27:06 #
Nov 23, 2016 11:42:14 #
tsilva wrote:
maybe you should add a camera into your workflow. although your ability to use ps to create a semi believable face is commendable
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
shooting jpg is fine when all you produce is crap and you are going to attempt to cover it up with added bullsh*t
I thought it was an advertising shot for some body piercing shop. Why would such have to look realistic.
Nov 23, 2016 12:04:59 #
BTW tainkc, I too, like your image.
tainkc wrote:
And with a Jpeg at that! I suppose the raw police will be after me now. "Oh, you have to shoot in raw!" Why? "It doesn't matter where your white balance is set if you shoot in raw!" Really? I have a life. It doesn't really matter. I am laughing all the way to the bank.
Nov 23, 2016 20:04:48 #
Nov 23, 2016 20:07:33 #
John_F wrote:
That is actually what I sold it for... As an advertising piece, but not for the piercings. Those are a huge sore spot for me (no pun intended). It all has to do with who the model is. I am not going into that.I thought it was an advertising shot for some body piercing shop. Why would such have to look realistic.
Nov 23, 2016 20:29:29 #
Very fine download..excellent pp work..anxious to see a shot of it on a billboard..what an honor!
Nov 23, 2016 21:23:08 #
rlaugh wrote:
Thanks, I just wish I knew where it will be. I don't think it will be local.Very fine download..excellent pp work..anxious to see a shot of it on a billboard..what an honor!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.