EOS 5D Mark III
May 25, 2012 09:36:11 #
May 26, 2012 11:11:58 #
May 26, 2012 12:06:33 #
Schwabo
Loc: Florida
Jer. I have not shot low light yet. But a with all the ISO going to 102 000 it should be good.
May 26, 2012 13:05:30 #
They say the ISO is two stops better. 3200 or so is about this highest to get a decent photo on the mark 2 but I've heard that 12,500 or even 25,000 iso is good on the Mark 3.
I do a lot of low light photography and it's really the only feature I'm interested in. I just don't know if I want to pay 1300 more dollars for that over a mark 2.
I do a lot of low light photography and it's really the only feature I'm interested in. I just don't know if I want to pay 1300 more dollars for that over a mark 2.
Schwabo wrote:
Jer. I have not shot low light yet. But a with all the ISO going to 102 000 it should be good.
Jun 14, 2012 23:05:58 #
Schwabo
Loc: Florida
I will be shooting low light tomorrow in a nightclub. I will let you know how it turns out. Schwabo
Jun 15, 2012 03:16:34 #
It will be interest to know how the nightclub shoot went.
I'm by my swimming pool which is lit by some led lights, very low power. The photos do show up but won't be usable for anyone except maybe police. You could make out objects. I haven't looked at them on a large monitor but it seems the autofocus did lock on to something. the m2 would still be searching.
I'm by my swimming pool which is lit by some led lights, very low power. The photos do show up but won't be usable for anyone except maybe police. You could make out objects. I haven't looked at them on a large monitor but it seems the autofocus did lock on to something. the m2 would still be searching.
Schwabo wrote:
I will be shooting low light tomorrow in a nightclub. I will let you know how it turns out. Schwabo
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.