Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Deleting in camera
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 17, 2016 16:21:11   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Who said it happened in the MFT????

It said it 'opens up a space for writing'. Space used by the next file.

Your objection is ridiculous as this is not a treatise on deleting recovering formatting process. As noted in my answer it is a 'superficial explanation'.

If one really wants to know what happens is more complex as only one char is replaced to indicate that the pointer to the file space is reusable. Even that is too simple.

As to formatting you have three main types (not to mention the various technology used depending on OS) and none is secure so... Stop trying to correct everything and everyone. You certainly know your stuff and are an expert but others are too. Do not render issues more complex than they needs to be.

Disk infrastructure and management is a complex field that cannot be explained fully in a forum, especially on a forum like this one.

Your post is a 'pedant bulshit' made to impress folks that are unaware. And yes, I am a certified a-hole with an alphabet soup under its name when I was working.

Note: You are right. I should have used FAT##.
Who said it happened in the MFT???? br br It said... (show quote)


Ron, if you don't want to be corrected, then don't post inaccurate information - you of all people should know better. As for making the subject more complex than needed, I would remind you that you brought up the subject of MFT and repeated the incorrect assertion that fragmentation is an issue in solid state storage - it had already been addressed previously.

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 16:34:16   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
TriX wrote:
Ron, if you don't want to be corrected, then don't post inaccurate information - you of all people should know better. As for making the subject more complex than needed, I would remind you that you brought up the subject of MFT and repeated the incorrect assertion that fragmentation is an issue in solid state storage - it had already been addressed previously.

Fragmentation IS AN ISSUE. I am surprised you do not acknowledge that*.

As to the MFT issue, had you paid attention to my reply I acknowledged the error. (Last sentence)

As I said, you can pull wool over the eyes of many, no me. Not that I claim to know more than you, I do not. I have been out of the field for too long to be fully relevant. You likely know more than I as I am at loss now on some issue but HDD and other basic elements? Nope these have the same issues.

-----
* This is why SSD drives slow down over time (this may have changed as my info is about 6 years old)

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 16:58:36   #
jim quist Loc: Missouri
 
I began deleting in the camera a couple of months ago, I did an engagement session on Sunday, and half the images were corrupted. Glad I had double card slots because the other card was okay. Now I know why.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2016 16:59:14   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Actually, I heard from a Pro that corruption will happen only in the uFART2 area of a storage device. Something to do with the way the off-gassing occurs there......., wait a minute...., maybe if got it confused a bit. Let me go back into Google and double check to see if I've got that right!?
He did after all FART a few times while we were talking about it!!!
SS

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 17:04:00   #
whitewolfowner
 
jim quist wrote:
I began deleting in the camera a couple of months ago, I did an engagement session on Sunday, and half the images were corrupted. Glad I had double card slots because the other card was okay. Now I know why.


Probably because you had done it in the computer at earlier dates; the problem was planted and just waiting to show itself.

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 17:20:59   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Ron,

I don't think this is really germane to the OPs question, and I would be glad to discuss this via PM rather than take this topic into the weeds, but as you know, you've added me to your "ignore" list since the last time we disagreed on a subject. Note that I did not reciprocate, so feel free to PM me to discuss.

You are correct that fragmentation was an issue on spinning disk. In fact, any non-sequential access of data (requiring more than minimum head movement) could substantially affect HD performance - it's all about how far you need to move the read head to get to the next block/sector/track. Since there are no heads in solid state storage, this obviously isn't an issue, and the HW access time to read block 110FF2 is the same to read block 111AA1 (or whatever). In fact due to wear leveling and TRIM, modern solid state storage is often fragmented, even for large contiguous files. The file system is a different story - it may or may not require more time to read non-contiguous memory locations based on the structure of the file system (think WAFL as an example) and if the FS is doing look-ahead read caching of the next group of blocks, BUT the time is trivial compared to the milliseconds it takes to move the head. What's the take away for the typical user? Defragmenting can improve the performance of HDs as can other file system tuning, but it has no noticeable effect on solid state storage, and in fact, extra erase and write cycles caused by defragmenting aps use up the limited number of erase/write cycles of solid state devices and should be avoided. Can we agree on that?

Regards,
Chris

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 18:38:20   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
jimmya wrote:
What that photographer told you is true, sometimes. I've heard of many cases where the card was instantly destroyed when this was done, not sure why. So, if you have important shots or video on that card, it could be all history. The best way, recommended by so many, is to upload, make sure of data safety then format in the camera. Why the delete button? Who knows.

I've deleted literally thousands of shots on 4 different bodies over the last 10 years with 0 problems. If there is a potential for memory card damage as a result, then its likely a vanishingly small one.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2016 18:39:31   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
jim quist wrote:
I began deleting in the camera a couple of months ago, I did an engagement session on Sunday, and half the images were corrupted. Glad I had double card slots because the other card was okay. Now I know why.

What camera? What card and model?

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 19:27:11   #
Jim Bob
 
alliebess wrote:
A professional photographer recently told me that I should not delete images in my camera, that this could corrupt the SD card. I've been doing this and had no problems so far. And, if this is wrong, why is there a "delete" button on cameras? Opinions, please?


Bunch of bull, urban legend, superstitious crap. Of course you can delete in camera without card damage. Do you really think camera companies would design a system to corrupt memory cards? Come on, man.

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 19:46:54   #
whitewolfowner
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Bunch of bull, urban legend, superstitious crap. Of course you can delete in camera without card damage. Do you really think camera companies would design a system to corrupt memory cards? Come on, man.




Shows how smart some pros out there are. Did he have his union card and degree handy? LOL

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 19:58:24   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Bunch of bull, urban legend, superstitious crap. Of course you can delete in camera without card damage. Do you really think camera companies would design a system to corrupt memory cards? Come on, man.

Agree. If the problem occurs even one time and someone posts it on the internet it somehow becomes an absolute truth. After all, if its on the internet it has to be true.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2016 20:02:07   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
I've been deleting in camera for years. No problems.
I wonder if people are not waiting for the process to complete before turning the camera off or performing another function?

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 20:10:59   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Who said it happened in the MFT????

It said it 'opens up a space for writing'. Space used by the next file.

Your objection is ridiculous as this is not a treatise on deleting recovering formatting process. As noted in my answer it is a 'superficial explanation'.

If one really wants to know what happens is more complex as only one char is replaced to indicate that the pointer to the file space is reusable. Even that is too simple.

As to formatting you have three main types (not to mention the various technology used depending on OS) and none is secure so... Stop trying to correct everything and everyone. You certainly know your stuff and are an expert but others are too. Do not render issues more complex than they needs to be.

Disk infrastructure and management is a complex field that cannot be explained fully in a forum, especially on a forum like this one.

Your post is a 'pedant bulshit' made to impress folks that are unaware. And yes, I am a certified a-hole with an alphabet soup under its name when I was working.

Note: You are right. I should have used FAT##.
Who said it happened in the MFT???? br br It said... (show quote)


Ron, thank you for confirming that TriX knows what he is talking about. It was you that said MFT, and you are correct it should be FAT, and it is in general not a level of detail we need to worry about.

Either way. It is safe to delete files in camera. It is also good to reformat in camera periodically.

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 20:30:52   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Peterff wrote:
Ron, thank you for confirming that TriX knows what he is talking about. It was you that said MFT, and you are correct it should be FAT, and it is in general not a level of detail we need to worry about.

Either way. It is safe to delete files in camera. It is also good to reformat in camera periodically.

Read the last line of my post.

Reply
Nov 17, 2016 21:09:34   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Read the last line of my post.


Ron I did, and even six years ago it was questionable. Then SSD writes were a lot slower then than they are today. SSD is now seen as the future of I/O in many ways:

See http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/cori/burst-buffer/burst-buffer/

Cori is the 5th fastest computer in the world according to the newly released TOP500 list. "Burst Buffer" - essentially an SSD layer of storage between the computer and underlying file system - is used to accelerate information access and application performance in the worlds most demanding workloads.

While your comments are understood, you are essentially comparing your 2CV to the next generation Orion spacecraft. The system used to analyze and optimize the design of things like the re-entry vehicles for Orion https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/orion/index.html is called Pleiades, https://www.nas.nasa.gov/hecc/resources/pleiades.html it is currently the 13th most powerful computer system on the TOP500.

I've literally just got back home from a week at SC16 http://sc16.supercomputing.org/ and admittedly my brain is a little full, but looking at where the world is going in the next five years or so from a technology perspective is quite inspiring. What the world's foremost scientists and vendors are doing now and will be doing over the next few years goes a little beyond your footnote.

If you are interested, check out the keynote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0KzMK_rh_g&feature=youtu.be

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.