Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon Nikkor AF 70-210 F4 - 5.6
May 23, 2012 05:59:12   #
authorizeduser Loc: Monroe, Michigan
 
I am considering buying a Nikon Nikkor AF 70-210 F4-5.6 lens and would like to know if anyone has any experience with one. I will be using it on my D200 for bird and animal shots. Granted this lens is 10-15 years old but is in mint condition all the way around with perfect lens. All metal and solid with screws. Looks new in the photo. It is a push/pull zoom which I have never seem before. I am used to twist zooms.

Almost forgot. The seller is asking $130 but will take $100 cash.
This lens appears to sell for a low of around $89 for good condition to $200+ for mint condition on ebay. This is a local sale so I can try the lens first.

Thanks in advance for any and all assistance

Reply
May 23, 2012 07:52:30   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
The AF on that lens is EXTREMELY slow when compared to the 55-200mm, 70-300mm or 55-300mm lenses of today. I personally think I would pass and buy a newer style lens if I were you. That lens is closer to 20 years old also.

Reply
May 23, 2012 19:14:31   #
Festina Lente Loc: Florida & Missouri
 
Depends on how you plan to use it. Long exposures - it might be fine. For everyday use it might be limiting (slow as MT pointed out above).

Furthermore, unless you are buying it at a real bargain, I'd pool my money on a more modern lens.

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2012 21:39:51   #
authorizeduser Loc: Monroe, Michigan
 
Thanks for all the replies ....

Reply
May 24, 2012 11:31:46   #
Herbnapa Loc: Napa, California
 
I have one that I'm willing to let you have. The optics are fine. I don't really know what is meant by slow AF is, it is a little noisy though. It has the metal HN-24 hood, but I don't have a rear cap for it. It does not have the "D" marking, curiously.

If you don't like it, you can "pass it forward". Let me know.

Reply
May 24, 2012 11:47:15   #
Herbnapa Loc: Napa, California
 
The 70-210 f4.5 that I love is a Kiron strictly manual. The optics are superb. Kiron is one of several companies that used to make the classic Vivitar Series 1.

With my 28-300, the Kiron hasn't any really practical use, but I love the way it feels. Strictly sentimental.

Reply
May 24, 2012 14:16:12   #
Festina Lente Loc: Florida & Missouri
 
Herbnapa wrote:
.... I don't really know what is meant by slow AF is....


Slow AF is slow Auto Focus - the amount of time it takes the lens and camera to focus on your subject so you can take a photo. Some lenses do a lot of searching and hunting to achieve focus which can cause you to miss shots.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2012 18:22:16   #
Herbnapa Loc: Napa, California
 
Thanks, I was aware of the reference to autofocus, but the latter part of your asnswer did clarify was might go into makeing the focus slow. This particular lense does not seem to have trouble locking in. Anyway, it the forum member wants to have the lens, no charge, I'd be happy to send it.

Reply
May 24, 2012 20:58:54   #
Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA
 
Herbnapa wrote:
The 70-210 f4.5 that I love is a Kiron strictly manual. The optics are superb. Kiron is one of several companies that used to make the classic Vivitar Series 1.

With my 28-300, the Kiron hasn't any really practical use, but I love the way it feels. Strictly sentimental.


Your post interested me because of something that happened about 25 years ago. At that time, in addition to photography as a hobby, I also collected, traded, and sold cameras. I had some real classics like a Nikon F3HP,Nikon FE, Nikon FA, Minolta SRT101, and 201, several Pentax, Olympus OM1, OM1n, OM2, OM2n, OM3, OM4, OM10, Contax, Minolta, Canon AE1, and two or three other higher level Canons, (never had any Leica equipment though). Anyway, I had about 30 to 40 bodies and about twice that many lenses. A friend of mine that shot Nikon and I decided one day to test which mfg. made the sharpest lenses. At that time I was shooting Olympus. We set up a target (the kind that repair shops use to test lenses. We chose what we thought would be some of the better lenses and fired away. The lens that was the sharpest was a Vivitar Series 1 70-210 -- which is most likely the same lens you are talking about! The next sharpest was the Olympus 75-150. The Olympus was no surprise since their lenses are highly respected throughout the photo world but the Series 1 was a total surprise. I'm not saying it was a better lens than the Contax, Nikon, or Canon lenses. There may have been problems we didn't test for like aberration, pin-cushioning, color correctness etc. Just on the pure sharpness level though, it beat them all. Amazing how sometimes there are little hidden gems out there!

Reply
May 24, 2012 21:51:14   #
Herbnapa Loc: Napa, California
 
Bridges wrote:
Herbnapa wrote:
The 70-210 f4.5 that I love is a Kiron strictly manual. The optics are superb. Kiron is one of several companies that used to make the classic Vivitar Series 1.

With my 28-300, the Kiron hasn't any really practical use, but I love the way it feels. Strictly sentimental.


Your post interested me because of something that happened about 25 years ago. At that time, in addition to photography as a hobby, I also collected, traded, and sold cameras. I had some real classics like a Nikon F3HP,Nikon FE, Nikon FA, Minolta SRT101, and 201, several Pentax, Olympus OM1, OM1n, OM2, OM2n, OM3, OM4, OM10, Contax, Minolta, Canon AE1, and two or three other higher level Canons, (never had any Leica equipment though). Anyway, I had about 30 to 40 bodies and about twice that many lenses. A friend of mine that shot Nikon and I decided one day to test which mfg. made the sharpest lenses. At that time I was shooting Olympus. We set up a target (the kind that repair shops use to test lenses. We chose what we thought would be some of the better lenses and fired away. The lens that was the sharpest was a Vivitar Series 1 70-210 -- which is most likely the same lens you are talking about! The next sharpest was the Olympus 75-150. The Olympus was no surprise since their lenses are highly respected throughout the photo world but the Series 1 was a total surprise. I'm not saying it was a better lens than the Contax, Nikon, or Canon lenses. There may have been problems we didn't test for like aberration, pin-cushioning, color correctness etc. Just on the pure sharpness level though, it beat them all. Amazing how sometimes there are little hidden gems out there!
quote=Herbnapa The 70-210 f4.5 that I love is a K... (show quote)


I'm looking forward to using it on my D800e when I finally get it.

Reply
May 24, 2012 22:24:45   #
Festina Lente Loc: Florida & Missouri
 
Bridges wrote:
Your post interested me because of something that happened about 25 years ago. At that time, in addition to photography as a hobby, I also collected, traded, and sold cameras. I had some real classics like a Nikon F3HP,Nikon FE, Nikon FA, Minolta SRT101, and 201, several Pentax, Olympus OM1, OM1n, OM2, OM2n, OM3, OM4, OM10, Contax, Minolta, Canon AE1, and two or three other higher level Canons, (never had any Leica equipment though). Anyway, I had about 30 to 40 bodies and about twice that many lenses. A friend of mine that shot Nikon and I decided one day to test which mfg. made the sharpest lenses. At that time I was shooting Olympus. We set up a target (the kind that repair shops use to test lenses. We chose what we thought would be some of the better lenses and fired away. The lens that was the sharpest was a Vivitar Series 1 70-210 -- which is most likely the same lens you are talking about! The next sharpest was the Olympus 75-150. The Olympus was no surprise since their lenses are highly respected throughout the photo world but the Series 1 was a total surprise. I'm not saying it was a better lens than the Contax, Nikon, or Canon lenses. There may have been problems we didn't test for like aberration, pin-cushioning, color correctness etc. Just on the pure sharpness level though, it beat them all. Amazing how sometimes there are little hidden gems out there!
Your post interested me because of something that ... (show quote)


Great story Bridges! Sometimes we forget how many quality pieces of equipment were made 20 to 30 years ago that lacked the marketing budgets of the big boys and/or because they decided to put that marketing money towards making good quality lenses that met or beat the competition in both quality and price. Thanks for the perspective.

Reply
 
 
Jul 31, 2012 22:07:01   #
authorizeduser Loc: Monroe, Michigan
 
sure I will take it if the offer is still good.

Jim Glenn
29143 Glenwood Street
Inkster, MI 48141

Reply
Jul 31, 2012 22:08:24   #
authorizeduser Loc: Monroe, Michigan
 
Herbnapa wrote:
I have one that I'm willing to let you have. The optics are fine. I don't really know what is meant by slow AF is, it is a little noisy though. It has the metal HN-24 hood, but I don't have a rear cap for it. It does not have the "D" marking, curiously.

If you don't like it, you can "pass it forward". Let me know.


sure I will take it if the offer is still good.

Jim Glenn
29143 Glenwood Street
Inkster, MI 48141

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.