An honest question for Liberals and Democrats

Most of you believe in Obama and support Hillary. My question is how can you do either when it comes to the immigration of Muslims from Syria, etc. The FBI has already said they can't be properly vetted at this time yet Obama has already brought thousands into our country and I read where Hillary wants to bring in another 200,000 or so. Even if that number is wrong (at this point what difference does it make) the odds are pretty good that a few (could be more than a few) will be radicalized. Additionally the fact is that the biggest percentage of the ones that would be allowed in will be un-sk**led and immediately go on the welfare where it will be up to the American tax payers to support them.

As Forest Gump said, "i may not be a smart man" but this seems to me ludicrous. Why chance it? If we feel the need to do something of a humanitarian nature for these people lets do it but let them remain overseas. We just don't need to help the foxes get into the chicken coop!

Any one care to give a non-BS, straight forward answer to this one.

An honest question for Liberals and Democrats

Most of you believe in Obama and support Hillary. My question is how can you do either when it comes to the immigration of Muslims from Syria, etc. The FBI has already said they can't be properly vetted at this time yet Obama has already brought thousands into our country and I read where Hillary wants to bring in another 200,000 or so. Even if that number is wrong (at this point what difference does it make) the odds are pretty good that a few (could be more than a few) will be radicalized. Additionally the fact is that the biggest percentage of the ones that would be allowed in will be un-sk**led and immediately go on the welfare where it will be up to the American tax payers to support them.

As Forest Gump said, "i may not be a smart man" but this seems to me ludicrous. Why chance it? If we feel the need to do something of a humanitarian nature for these people lets do it but let them remain overseas. We just don't need to help the foxes get into the chicken coop!

Any one care to give a non-BS, straight forward answer to this one.

It is MY belief that the vast majority of the Syrians, entering this country, are NOT a threat to us.

They are refugees. Yes, I'm sure that there are some of them that should stay behind and fight for their country. There are exceptions to EVERY rule.
I'm NOT talking about these people.

I'm talking about the people who need help. Some will say...let the rest of the world help. But, is that the way the "leader" of the free world acts?

At one point in our history, we "gladly" accepted people from all over the world. Yes, I know times were a bit different then.

When a natural disaster hits a part of the world, we have no problem helping. Is this really so much different? Or are we only happy to help as long as "they" don't set foot on our soil?

Could some of the people entering the US be a threat to us......of course.

Do we reject the 99% in order to protest from the 1%? (I made up those percentages).

Lastly, this is NOT a Clinton or a Trump question. It's a question of who WE want to be.

We each have to answer these questions for ourselves.