Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Sony RX10 111
Sep 28, 2016 06:05:58 #
Does anyone have this camera yet and if so give us some feedback please?
Sep 28, 2016 09:03:54 #
You may wish to carefully compare the RX10 Mk III with its Mk II predecessor - lower cost (now) and faster optics
Sep 28, 2016 11:33:11 #
Ralph,
Thankyou, I have the Fz1000 but the extra reach is tempting me.
Jim
Thankyou, I have the Fz1000 but the extra reach is tempting me.
Jim
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 28, 2016 12:25:43 #
The Mk II is the choice I was nudging you toward despite the greater reach of the Mk III. Have you noticed the large number of UHH members (and non-members) who rushed out headlong to embrace longer and heavier lenses only to turn around and sell those lenses, for whatever reason
, in 5-6 months? Sometimes bigger is not always better.
, in 5-6 months? Sometimes bigger is not always better.Sep 29, 2016 05:36:06 #
mas24
Loc: Southern CA
The Sony RX10III Bridge Camera with a focal length of 600mm and a 1" sensor, is the best Bridge Camera you can buy at $1600. I've seen excellent images from this camera. The Panasonic fz1000 is a close 2nd place at 400mm focal length, and less expensive.
Sep 29, 2016 06:57:35 #
I have it, love it and highly recommend it if you need/want the reach. I walked and carried it for 5 hours on Sat with no problem at all.
Sep 29, 2016 07:37:08 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 29, 2016 07:37:10 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Sep 29, 2016 07:37:15 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Sep 29, 2016 07:38:13 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Sep 29, 2016 07:38:24 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Sep 29, 2016 07:38:26 #
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Sep 29, 2016 08:21:14 #
Sep 29, 2016 08:35:27 #
Auerbach wrote:
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Got your point the first time.
Sep 29, 2016 08:50:09 #
mas24
Loc: Southern CA
Auerbach wrote:
I just spent two weeks in Italy with it and other than getting used to some exposure quirks -- I'm a canon guy-- it was a super camera fir the trip. The extra reach was a big plus.
Wow. 6 threads in a row with the same message. That's a real filibuster.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.