Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Needing a new camera and would like suggestions
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 18, 2012 11:20:04   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Emmasmom wrote:
The issue I am having with my camera now is that the flash is entirely too bright and I don't think the quality of the pictures are very good they seem a little blurry to me for some reason and I have used a Canon 50D I believe and the quality of the pictures were so much better. I mainly shoot portraits.


I would try taking a couple of shots with the camera set at AV f5.6 and f6.3. You will need to set the exposure compensation for -1/3 Ev and -2/3 Ev taking a least one picture with each combination for a total of four shots. Once you have done that up load them here so we can look at them.

Reply
May 18, 2012 11:31:53   #
Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana
 
a new canon 60D for just under $1000 or 7D around $1500.

Reply
May 18, 2012 12:42:40   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
Emmasmom wrote:
I am a amature and currenty I have just a simple cheaper Canon Rebel and I want to upgrade a little, I would like to stay between $1000 and $1500...any suggestions on which one I should get?


Why do you want to upgrade? What is it about your current camera don't you like, or what are you looking for in a new camera? Would upgrading your lenses make more sense or do you really need a new camera? If so and you like Canon I would suggest you wait until June http://www.photographybay.com/2012/05/17/canon-rebel-t4i650d-rumored-specs/

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2012 13:29:56   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
gdwsr wrote:
Oh Emmasmom are you going to get a list!!! How about a Sony A55 or A65. More seriously, check out what the "Camera of the Year" is given by the various photo magazines for a start. More importantly, when you get it narrowed down, handle them. One that feel good in your hands will mean a lot in terms of enjoyment and enjoyment will make better pictures. Check how intuitive the settings, dials, etc are for you.

Let us know what you decide.


The Sony A77 or the new A35, might be out of your price range, but the Sony Alpha's are great.

Reply
May 18, 2012 14:28:56   #
Festina Lente Loc: Florida & Missouri
 
trapper jim wrote:
I am a Nikon guy. Been using all the upper end Nikons since Vietnam starting with the F series and moving up through the D series at the beginning of the new century.

So when I took a fun trip to the islands last year I chose the Canon SX-30is over the Nikon Coolpix 500, because the 500's were sold out everywhere. (Ended up paying About 425.00 with a good class 10 chip) It had an optical 24 to 840mm fixed lens!! I found it to be a great camera for the use intended. With the super zoom you could really reach out and touch someone. In addition it shoots pretty good video. I actually did some HD video for a commercial job with it.

This year a friend of mine was going on a road trip and wanted a camera to take with him. I let him take the SX30is. 4 days later he emailed me some of his photos. His image quality was pretty good, but since he has never really taken many photos, his composition was pretty bad. He liked the camera so much he sent me a 400 dollar check for it.

Now, I am without an inexpensive pretty darn good camera. So I again purchased a simular camera. I was thinking of the new Nikon Coolpix 510. It had a 24 to 1000mm optical zoom lens. but Nikon decided to up the megapixel race which resulted in poorer performance on available low light. This along with along with the lack of not having a hot shoe for an external flash, and poor battery life led me back to replacing the Canon SX30is with another one. I opted for the new Canon SX40 HS. It has some big improvements over the SX 30. Canon reduced the megapixels from 14 to 12, thus improving low light performance and less noise in higher sensitivity settings.

The Canon cameras discussed above really can't compare to the Nikon D3. But again the cost of a Canon power shot SX40HS with the super optical zoom lens with a digital 2x zoom feature which puts the camera capability of 48 to 1680mm at 6 megapixels, only will set ypu back about 400 plus dollars, compared to the Nikon D-3 at $20,000 bucks with FX lenses to compare to the one Big super zoom lens on the SX40. Here is the real kicker. The SX40HS would weigh 30 pounds less than a Pro D3 with case and lenses, and immage quality being quite acceptable.
I am a Nikon guy. Been using all the upper end Ni... (show quote)


Great shots and a good lesson. Those darn P&S cameras just keep getting better and making those of us with 10 pounds of SLR gear and multiple thousands invested look foolish, pretentious and/or stubborn.
I continue to be impressed how well they do when the light and stars all line up.

Reply
May 18, 2012 16:55:46   #
C. David Loc: Wisconsin
 
Ok people. It was a simple question asked, and I understand we need more info to help a fellow photo-nut out. Perhaps next time someone who asks for info they can be more precise about what exactly their issues are, instead of general questions. Perhaps Admin. can include that section in the portion where you sign up for this site.Just a thought.8-)

Reply
May 18, 2012 20:06:22   #
slickrock Loc: jacksonville
 
The 5D mk2 is close to your budget now. May want to what happens price-wise when the mk3 is more wide-spead in it's delivery.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.