Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
24-70 f 2.8 alternatives
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Aug 20, 2016 02:34:39   #
rspmd23 Loc: NYC , now in Westlake, Florida
 
My daughter wants a 24-70 f 2.8 for her Nikon. Has anyone had experience with any of the off brand lenses (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina ) ? She can't afford the real deal.

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 02:36:48   #
Just Dawn Loc: North Carolina
 
I hear Tamron's version is pretty sweet. I read a study in which it beat the sigma hands down and was less expensive

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 02:56:55   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
Before using digital Nikons, I bought the 24-70 f/2.8 Sigma in preference to Nikon own make. The Nikon lens front element, rotated on zooming/focussing. This made the use of a Polar filter a PITA. Still using the Sigma lens on my Nikon digital cameras, both DX and FX. And to refer to another thread running at the moment...The Sigma lens has a Petal lens-hood.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2016 03:33:26   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
rspmd23 wrote:
My daughter wants a 24-70 f 2.8 for her Nikon. Has anyone had experience with any of the off brand lenses (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina ) ? She can't afford the real deal.


The 24-120 f4 VR Nikon lens is worth consideration.

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 03:53:39   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/tamron-24-70mm-2p8-vc-usd

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 04:48:21   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
I just went through several months with this dilemma. After many considerations,tests, reviews,etc,the Tamron and Tokina were the best for me. The most expensive "real deal" was not necessarily the best lens. I opted for the vibration reduction model and received my Tamron last week from B&H and along with a 10% store credit as well. The Tokina was my first preference,but I believe personally that I will do better with a vibration reduction model with my physical condition.

Best of luck!

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 11:49:19   #
rspmd23 Loc: NYC , now in Westlake, Florida
 
Follow-up question. Is there a significant risk in buying the international version other than the warranty issue (over $500 cheaper) ?

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2016 11:52:14   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
They are not for me,but some feel that there are few problems and don't mind taking the risk.

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 11:54:17   #
rspmd23 Loc: NYC , now in Westlake, Florida
 
Thanks to all Very helpful

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 12:13:30   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Pablo8 wrote:
Before using digital Nikons, I bought the 24-70 f/2.8 Sigma in preference to Nikon own make. The Nikon lens front element, rotated on zooming/focussing. This made the use of a Polar filter a PITA. Still using the Sigma lens on my Nikon digital cameras, both DX and FX. And to refer to another thread running at the moment...The Sigma lens has a Petal lens-hood.


Say what???? Nikon's front element does not, nor has it EVER rotated while focusing OR zooming. No idea where you ever got this false notion.

Reply
Aug 20, 2016 20:15:38   #
nicksr1125 Loc: Mesa, AZ
 
Tamron's 28-75 f/2.8 is another good alternative and you don't have to worry about buying an international version to save money. B&H sells it for $500.00. You give up 4mm on the wide end but, I haven't found that to be a problem. Filters are much less expensive also.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2016 20:43:50   #
Jim Bob
 
rspmd23 wrote:
My daughter wants a 24-70 f 2.8 for her Nikon. Has anyone had experience with any of the off brand lenses (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina ) ? She can't afford the real deal.

Tokina. Built like a tank and super sharp. No image stabilization.

Reply
Aug 21, 2016 04:25:11   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Say what???? Nikon's front element does not, nor has it EVER rotated while focusing OR zooming. No idea where you ever got this false notion.


*****************************************************************************
So sorry, MT, I should have mentioned, I was referring to the nearest Nikon equivalent (at that time), the 28-85 lens, where the front rotated while focussing. But it was some time ago when I bought the Sigma. Digital was not on the photographic scene.

Reply
Aug 21, 2016 06:54:37   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
rspmd23 wrote:
My daughter wants a 24-70 f 2.8 for her Nikon. Has anyone had experience with any of the off brand lenses (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina ) ? She can't afford the real deal.


Good comparison. Also, consider used. I got a Nikon 35-70 f/2.8 for $292.00 on ebay - it looks like new.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV9ju8LmRfU
http://www.diyphotography.net/great-24-70mm-f2-8-shootout-pits-nearly-identical-canon-nikkor-pentax-sony/

Reply
Aug 21, 2016 07:15:56   #
CO
 
Your daughter is shooting with a full frame Nikon then. You didn't specify in your post. I rented the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 IF EX lens. I was very impressed with it. It's sharp and has fast and quiet autofocus.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.