Bob Evans wrote:
After months of looking at this site. Today was the first time I asked a question, and I feel like I got an education. Not being a pro, I did not have any idea of the things I learned by reading the responses. So thanks to you all. Best advice was from rook2c4 get the 135mm since I have the 5omm already.
I am not a "pro" either; I don't pay my bills with photography, but, I've been into photography for a really long time and you don't have to be a PRO to own and use PRO grade gear.
If your interest is in portraiture, then the 135mm is probably not the best advice you got. You probably already know this but, the T3i has what is called a crop frame image sensor (technical designation is APS-C) which means the image sensor is smaller than a standard 35mm equivalent image sensor which is just about the same size as a frame of 35mm file, and is called full frame. The image sensor in your Canon has a 1.6 crop factor vs a full frame sensor. That means you take the focal length of the lens and multiply it by 1.6 giving you the 35mm equivalent focal length of the lens. A 135mm lens times crop factor of 1.6 gives you a 216mm equivalent and that's a bit long for most portraiture photography.
On the other hand, the 85mm will give you a 136mm equivalent and this is more realistic when it comes to portraits.
I have no idea of how much money you want to or can spend, the T3i was a nice starter DSLR that's been out of production for a couple years now, you may want to consider looking into a used or refurbished 60D, the T3i's big brother, or 70D, both of which have crop frame sensors or a 6D which is full frame.
Another option to consider is the EF 24-105 f/4L IS lens which on a crop frame body gives you the equivalent of 38-168mm and since it has image stabilization, you can hand hold it at some pretty slow shutter speeds and still get good results. It's a nice general purpose and portrait lens, a good one to have.
In my original response I was referring to a lens Canon came out with years ago and will soon be releasing the third version of the lens. It is one of the best, if not the best, portrait lenses Canon makes, not to mention one of the sharpest lenses Canon makes and for a non super telephoto prime, one of the most expensive. That's why mine is an original version of the lens, optically as good as the ones they make today but a whole lot less expensive, plus I've had it for a long time. They also make an EF 85 f/1.8 that's not an L series lens but is a darn good portrait lens and costs about 1/5 what the f/1.2L costs new.