Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Help with this one
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 12, 2016 11:31:37   #
Lady Red Loc: Puget Sound, WA
 
I definitely need help with this one. Yes, I know it is blurry. Fawns don't seem to want to stand that still at times and this was was definitely wanting to play this morning.

Yes, I should have used the 5500, didn't have it with me. 20 lashes with a wet noodle.

So, I tried cleaning it up, looked worse.

What, if anything, can I do?

Thank you everyone and have a beautiful day.

JL


(Download)

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 12:50:30   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
You already know it's not a good shot; don't waste your time. Put this shot behind you, go out and do better next time.

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 14:19:34   #
dannac Loc: 60 miles SW of New Orleans
 
run4fittness wrote:
I should have used the 5500

What did you use ?

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2016 14:36:10   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Just in case you don't get a chance to do a re-shoot, there are some marginal improvements that you can give it. You don't say what PP software you have so it's difficult to give specific advice, but if you have any sharpening software that uses deconvolution (often referred to as shake reduction or anti-blur or some such), that would be your best starting point.

In addition to sharpening, if you can't get proper sharpness, the next best thing is vividness, which can give an impression of sharpness. Clarity and Contrast are the best ways to increase vividness (as opposed to just turning up the saturation, which will have unwanted side effects). For best effect you can select the fawn for the extra Clarity and Contrast, and if you can include extra sharpening for the selection, even better.

Lightroom doesn't have anti-shake or anti-blur, but you do have some control over the sharpening process. For the following edit I put Radius and Masking full up, with the Sharpening slider at 66 (a bit more than half way to full) and the Details slider at 5 (very low). I also added a small amount of de-noise (5) with the Details slider well up (85), and I lightened it a bit.

The one thing you won't be able to do is crop. As shown it's on the limits of acceptability and even a small amount of cropping will take it beyond that limit. Fortunately the wide view suits the subject - a small fawn finding his way in the big wide world.

-


(Download)

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 14:37:01   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
dannac wrote:
What did you use ?


Coolpix S9700.

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 18:49:34   #
Lady Red Loc: Puget Sound, WA
 
Howard5252 wrote:
You already know it's not a good shot; don't waste your time. Put this shot behind you, go out and do better next time.


That is what I was thinking, but I figured the talented folks on here could give me some advice just in case.

This will teach me to not to pull out the smaller camera when heading out.

Thank you.

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 18:52:07   #
Lady Red Loc: Puget Sound, WA
 
R.G. wrote:
Just in case you don't get a chance to do a re-shoot, there are some marginal improvements that you can give it. You don't say what PP software you have so it's difficult to give specific advice, but if you have any sharpening software that uses deconvolution (often referred to as shake reduction or anti-blur or some such), that would be your best starting point.

In addition to sharpening, if you can't get proper sharpness, the next best thing is vividness, which can give an impression of sharpness. Clarity and Contrast are the best ways to increase vividness (as opposed to just turning up the saturation, which will have unwanted side effects). For best effect you can select the fawn for the extra Clarity and Contrast, and if you can include extra sharpening for the selection, even better.

Lightroom doesn't have anti-shake or anti-blur, but you do have some control over the sharpening process. For the following edit I put Radius and Masking full up, with the Sharpening slider at 66 (a bit more than half way to full) and the Details slider at 5 (very low). I also added a small amount of de-noise (5) with the Details slider well up (85), and I lightened it a bit.

The one thing you won't be able to do is crop. As shown it's on the limits of acceptability and even a small amount of cropping will take it beyond that limit. Fortunately the wide view suits the subject - a small fawn finding his way in the big wide world.

-
Just in case you don't get a chance to do a re-sho... (show quote)


Thank you for this. I do plan on going back up with the tripod in a day or so depending on how hard it is raining. This is Washington after all!

True, cropping did not help at all. In fact, to me, it made it worse. I did try those adjustments, under different names of course, and nothing was really clicking for me. I could make the white daisies really show up, or contrast for the lights and darks, but nothing that really made me happy.

So, off to try again! This was one friendly fawn and hung around for quite a while running back and forth.

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2016 18:52:19   #
Lady Red Loc: Puget Sound, WA
 
R.G. wrote:
Coolpix S9700.


correct.

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 20:15:28   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
run4fittness wrote:
That is what I was thinking, but I figured the talented folks on here could give me some advice just in case.

This will teach me to not to pull out the smaller camera when heading out.

Thank you.
Fine. I hope you realize one of your problems was camera movement ... that part was you, not the camera.

Reply
Jul 12, 2016 20:38:26   #
Lady Red Loc: Puget Sound, WA
 
Howard5252 wrote:
Fine. I hope you realize one of your problems was camera movement ... that part was you, not the camera.


Yes, I know that. Why I need the tripod next time.

Reply
Jul 13, 2016 08:04:19   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
Howard5252 wrote:
Fine. I hope you realize one of your problems was camera movement ... that part was you, not the camera.


Not really you. You can blame the subdued light demanding a slow shutter speed. So you can blame mother nature or camera design (limitrd iso).

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2016 09:50:57   #
trc Loc: Logan, OH
 
run4fittness wrote:
I definitely need help with this one. Yes, I know it is blurry. Fawns don't seem to want to stand that still at times and this was was definitely wanting to play this morning.

Yes, I should have used the 5500, didn't have it with me. 20 lashes with a wet noodle.

So, I tried cleaning it up, looked worse.

What, if anything, can I do?

Thank you everyone and have a beautiful day.

JL


Quote:
R.G. (a regular here) Joined: Sep 5, 2012 Posts: 6952 Loc: Scotland

Just in case you don't get a chance to do a re-shoot, there are some marginal improvements that you can give it. You don't say what PP software you have so it's difficult to give specific advice, but if you have any sharpening software that uses deconvolution (often referred to as shake reduction or anti-blur or some such), that would be your best starting point.

In addition to sharpening, if you can't get proper sharpness, the next best thing is vividness, which can give an impression of sharpness. Clarity and Contrast are the best ways to increase vividness (as opposed to just turning up the saturation, which will have unwanted side effects). For best effect you can select the fawn for the extra Clarity and Contrast, and if you can include extra sharpening for the selection, even better.

Lightroom doesn't have anti-shake or anti-blur, but you do have some control over the sharpening process. For the following edit I put Radius and Masking full up, with the Sharpening slider at 66 (a bit more than half way to full) and the Details slider at 5 (very low). I also added a small amount of de-noise (5) with the Details slider well up (85), and I lightened it a bit.

The one thing you won't be able to do is crop. As shown it's on the limits of acceptability and even a small amount of cropping will take it beyond that limit. Fortunately the wide view suits the subject - a small fawn finding his way in the big wide world.
R.G. (a regular here) Joined: Sep 5, 2012 Posts: 6... (show quote)



JL,

I think R.G. summed it up quite well - excellent advice and help. Not a whole lot to add, so take heed.

Best Regards,
Tom

Reply
Jul 13, 2016 12:13:00   #
rborud Loc: Minnesota
 
run4fittness wrote:
I definitely need help with this one. Yes, I know it is blurry. Fawns don't seem to want to stand that still at times and this was was definitely wanting to play this morning.

Yes, I should have used the 5500, didn't have it with me. 20 lashes with a wet noodle.

So, I tried cleaning it up, looked worse.

What, if anything, can I do?

Thank you everyone and have a beautiful day.

JL


run4
Here is the smallest bit of help, to what one could call impossible.
RBorud


(Download)

Reply
Jul 13, 2016 12:19:49   #
louparker Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
 
run4fittness wrote:
I definitely need help with this one. Yes, I know it is blurry. Fawns don't seem to want to stand that still at times and this was was definitely wanting to play this morning.

Yes, I should have used the 5500, didn't have it with me. 20 lashes with a wet noodle.

So, I tried cleaning it up, looked worse.

What, if anything, can I do?

Thank you everyone and have a beautiful day.

JL


Here's my PP using ACDSeePro9

Reply
Jul 13, 2016 12:27:33   #
louparker Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
 
louparker wrote:
Here's my PP using ACDSeePro9


Oops, "attach file" did not work.


(Download)

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.