I agree it is one heck of a box of technology and that is why we are buying them.
As usual Canon and Nikon camps are far apart. It is simply a matter of what you started with. I started with Nikon and I wait fairly patiently for the next big thing. I have been buying Nikon digital for 16 years.
The D800 exceeds my requirements. GREAT!
Sure I could have waited for the D7000 replacement, but why? As it is the D800 is a year late.
When I lost my D700 in December 2010 I thought the D800 was coming soon. It took a while getting here and was worth the wait.
And I most likely am going to print some oversize prints simply because I can.
One of the pictures hanging on my wall was shot 20 years ago with a 35mm and blown to 20x30 poster. My BSA and I never looked better in real B&W.
Now I have to unload my giant print washer. It's a lot of plexiglass and so 80's. I love it.
SteveR wrote:
Never bought into that "it isn't the camera it's the photographer" mantra. With the D7000, you can put it on auto and unless you violate the most basic laws of photography the camera will surprise you with the quality of photographs that it gives you.....so with current technology, I disagree. Back in the day of totally manual film cameras it probably did apply. A Canon Ftb worked basically just like an F1. The F1 was built better and had some more bells and whistles, but 250th/sec @ f4 was the same in both cameras. A cropped sensor camera, however, is not the same as a full frame camera, nor is a 10 megapixel crop camera the same as a 36 megapixel full frame camera.
Never bought into that "it isn't the camera i... (
show quote)