Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
To manipulate or not manipulate, that is the question...
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 1, 2011 18:53:52   #
dizit Loc: Cambria-Pines-by-the-Sea, CA. USA
 
What is the purpose of your shot?
If you're shooting photojournalism, then NO! you must not manipulate the image. That is not only dishonest, but negates the entire purpose of photojournalism which is, exactly as is journalism itself, to offer a true picture of the world.
Other than journalism, you can make the image much as you desire. My own personal opinion (which applies to me only) is that I shoot the best possible photo and, if it is as good as it can be, then I am allowed to manipulate it as much as I want...my main purpose is to create Art which hangs in galleries and hospitals, among other places.

magic carpet, blue
magic carpet, blue...

new years eve sunset
new years eve sunset...

tulip #20
tulip #20...

Reply
Oct 1, 2011 22:45:15   #
agej1001
 
bobmielke wrote:
Rachel wrote:
We just went over all this with almost 250 responses on "do real photographers edit?" I recomend you read that post. It was from friday a week ago.
Rach


Sorry Rachel, this topic gets beat to death on every photographic forum. I watched a live online talk show put on by top photographers and the bottom line was they agreed that those who complain the most about post processing don't have a clue how to use editing software. If properly used you can't tell it was "Photoshopped".

As far as the "keeping it natural" group I ask you this. If you're out taking a beautiful scenic landscape would you pick up a beer can in front of the scene? If you answer "yes" you'll altered reality. You've edited the shot.
quote=Rachel We just went over all this with almo... (show quote)


GO BOB! very well said about the beer can!

Reply
Oct 1, 2011 22:59:47   #
bobmielke Loc: Portland, OR
 
agej1001 wrote:
bobmielke wrote:
Rachel wrote:
We just went over all this with almost 250 responses on "do real photographers edit?" I recomend you read that post. It was from friday a week ago.
Rach


Sorry Rachel, this topic gets beat to death on every photographic forum. I watched a live online talk show put on by top photographers and the bottom line was they agreed that those who complain the most about post processing don't have a clue how to use editing software. If properly used you can't tell it was "Photoshopped".

As far as the "keeping it natural" group I ask you this. If you're out taking a beautiful scenic landscape would you pick up a beer can in front of the scene? If you answer "yes" you'll altered reality. You've edited the shot.
quote=Rachel We just went over all this with almo... (show quote)


GO BOB! very well said about the beer can!
quote=bobmielke quote=Rachel We just went over a... (show quote)



I'm sorry but I can't take credit for that analogy, it was said by Scott Kelby on his live talk show known as "The Grid". His topic dealt with the use of Post Processing, is it ok. They really tore up purists who insisted they did nothing to change reality. That claim was shredded by the panel by asking simple questions of purists like, "Did you use a polarizing filter on landscapes"? did you shoot in RAW or JPG? Either answer pointed out that the camera applies correction to JPG files and you must adjust everything in RAW formatted files. Purists are trying to kid the public and themselves that they get it "right" in the camera by not using post processing. What a joke!


http://kelbytv.com/thegrid/2011/08/18/the-grid-episode-20/

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2011 00:32:47   #
georgeedwards Loc: Essex, Md.
 
lexstgo wrote:
bobmielke wrote:
Rachel wrote:
We just went over all this with almost 250 responses on "do real photographers edit?" I recomend you read that post. It was from friday a week ago.
Rach


Sorry Rachel, this topic gets beat to death on every photographic forum. I watched a live online talk show put on by top photographers and the bottom line was they agreed that those who complain the most about post processing don't have a clue how to use editing software. If properly used you can't tell it was "Photoshopped".

As far as the "keeping it natural" group I ask you this. If you're out taking a beautiful scenic landscape would you pick up a beer can in front of the scene? If you answer "yes" you'll altered reality. You've edited the shot.
quote=Rachel We just went over all this with almo... (show quote)


Bob, I understand what you are saying, but the example you present is a little too "extreme". If you are taking a scenic landscape, there shouldn't be any beer can. That is litter and is not part of nature. So in reality what you do is picking up litter to prevent the area become a dumping ground with trash. Now, if you say that there are tree limbs and you remove them then you would be right. Beer can = trash = not natural = does not belong to the "nature" landscape scene (unless you are taking pictures of a landfill/dump/trash collection location).

Now for me (I do know how to use photoshop), it's the ethical dilemma as I have seen photographers "punished" for doing so and for not doing so.
quote=bobmielke quote=Rachel We just went over a... (show quote)


Boy could we get philosophical on this one! Man is part of nature, remember. You are assuming that man is not part of nature, but he is, it is inescapable.

Reply
Oct 2, 2011 01:34:55   #
bobmielke Loc: Portland, OR
 
This is a non-win argument. I've been here before on other forums. Bottom line, If you want to compete in the photographic world you must use editing software or you will not be competitive, either professionally or as an amateur in photo contests. Them's the facts off life. You can argue and fuss and call names but it won't change a thing. Get with the times or be left behind, whimpering how much of a purist you are. "I done it right" the purist cries.

Reply
Oct 2, 2011 02:58:24   #
docjoque Loc: SoCal
 
Perfect.

Reply
Oct 2, 2011 17:12:03   #
Max Savant Loc: Memphis, TN
 
Not wanting to get into a "pissing match" here but... and I know I said this on a previous post elsewhere... moving a beer can is "housekeeping" and using photographic techniques (filters, etc) is still photography. Once you start making masks and pasting images over other images you are now in the realm of graphic art.
Scott Kelby sells books on PS so of course he would say that those that complain don't know how to use it. I could say the same... in that those that rely on PS don't know how to use their camera...
but I am sure this debate will go on and on.....
Thank god we don't have painters on here or we would hear how painting is art and photography is a craft.....

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2011 19:04:32   #
dizit Loc: Cambria-Pines-by-the-Sea, CA. USA
 
Max Savant wrote:
Thank god we don't have painters on here or we would hear how painting is art and photography is a craft.....


LOL! Maybe some of us are both...and maybe both painting *and* photography are ART. I believe the world is big enough for multiple kinds of Art expression, and even many different ways of expressing oneself within any form of Art. As soon as we begin to put boundaries around artistic expression, Art begins to die. :cry:

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.