Bloke wrote:
Looks pretty good to me... My close-up/macro stacks are all processed in PS too. It does a pretty decent job, and why buy specialized software when we already have a good tool to hand. I always figured I might try some of the others later, but don't do *that* much stacking. Actually, it's been quite a while - I may have trouble remembering how I did it!
Agree with you bloke, unless of course somebody tells us of a programme that's definitely better than Ps.
I did the exercise twice, using exactly the same method, and Ps came up with two slightly different end results, both of which could have done with a tweak or two.
I also have trouble remembering all the tricks, unless it's something you do regularly us olduns are bound to forget! My solution is to keep a notebook dedicated to pp work and I print across the top of the page what I'm up to.