Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
What is an ideal histogram supposed to look like
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 9, 2012 12:31:10   #
Zenith701 Loc: Southern California
 
New to dslr so I don't really understand a lot. Is there an ideal shape for a histogram? In statistics a bell curve is kind of what you are trying for in dispersions. Is there something like this with histograms?

Reply
May 9, 2012 12:41:40   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
It varies with the photo.
A high key photo for example will have a lot of peaks on the right side and the opposite occurs with a photo that's overly dark. Both will be properly exposed though.
You need to learn to evaluate the scene and analyse the histogram.

A really good article here:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/understanding-histograms.shtml





Reply
May 9, 2012 12:59:54   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum histogram due to the nature of what a histogram tells you.

A histogram cannot and does not tell you if your shot is exposed properly. It can ONLY tell you the distribution of light and dark tones in a shot...which has nothing to do with exposure.

The only thing that's even close to being relevant is if there are light or dark tones that are "clipped" i.e. at the ends of the histo and cannot be recorded by the sensor and even then,that's not necessarily bad depending on what you intend with the shot itself.

Here is another resource about it

http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
May 9, 2012 14:57:04   #
Zenith701 Loc: Southern California
 
Thanks for the help. I have a better feel for what to look for.

Reply
May 9, 2012 15:07:31   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Ok, so, basically I can tell that from looking at the photo myself. How does the histogram aid me?

Reply
May 9, 2012 15:30:49   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
SteveR wrote:
Ok, so, basically I can tell that from looking at the photo myself. How does the histogram aid me?


All the histo tells you is:

Are there tones in my shot that lie beyond what my sensor can reproduce? (i.e. total black or white with no detail)

that's it.

Reply
May 9, 2012 19:13:33   #
snowbear
 
The thumbnails you see on the rear LCD may not be great for making assessments, so a histogram is useful in the field.

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
May 10, 2012 06:45:23   #
skidooman Loc: Minnesota
 
rpavich wrote:
SteveR wrote:
Ok, so, basically I can tell that from looking at the photo myself. How does the histogram aid me?


All the histo tells you is:

Are there tones in my shot that lie beyond what my sensor can reproduce? (i.e. total black or white with no detail)

that's it.


The reason to stop "chimping" and use a light meter if possible.

Reply
May 10, 2012 06:52:02   #
bioteacher Loc: Brooklyn, NY
 
rpavich wrote:
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum histogram due to the nature of what a histogram tells you.

A histogram cannot and does not tell you if your shot is exposed properly. It can ONLY tell you the distribution of light and dark tones in a shot...which has nothing to do with exposure.

The only thing that's even close to being relevant is if there are light or dark tones that are "clipped" i.e. at the ends of the histo and cannot be recorded by the sensor and even then,that's not necessarily bad depending on what you intend with the shot itself.

Here is another resource about it

http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum h... (show quote)


Having trouble getting to web site - is there another address?

Reply
May 10, 2012 06:53:44   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
bioteacher wrote:
rpavich wrote:
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum histogram due to the nature of what a histogram tells you.

A histogram cannot and does not tell you if your shot is exposed properly. It can ONLY tell you the distribution of light and dark tones in a shot...which has nothing to do with exposure.

The only thing that's even close to being relevant is if there are light or dark tones that are "clipped" i.e. at the ends of the histo and cannot be recorded by the sensor and even then,that's not necessarily bad depending on what you intend with the shot itself.

Here is another resource about it

http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum h... (show quote)


Having trouble getting to web site - is there another address?
quote=rpavich The other poster is correct; there ... (show quote)


Here is the file:

Attached file:
(Download)

Reply
May 10, 2012 06:54:22   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
skidooman wrote:
rpavich wrote:
SteveR wrote:
Ok, so, basically I can tell that from looking at the photo myself. How does the histogram aid me?


All the histo tells you is:

Are there tones in my shot that lie beyond what my sensor can reproduce? (i.e. total black or white with no detail)

that's it.


The reason to stop "chimping" and use a light meter if possible.


You won't get an argument from me! :)

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
May 10, 2012 08:51:33   #
sharkman53
 
expose the histogram to the right, look at your blikies and back off by a 1/3. You should have the right exposure.

Reply
May 10, 2012 09:06:39   #
bioteacher Loc: Brooklyn, NY
 
rpavich wrote:
bioteacher wrote:
rpavich wrote:
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum histogram due to the nature of what a histogram tells you.

A histogram cannot and does not tell you if your shot is exposed properly. It can ONLY tell you the distribution of light and dark tones in a shot...which has nothing to do with exposure.

The only thing that's even close to being relevant is if there are light or dark tones that are "clipped" i.e. at the ends of the histo and cannot be recorded by the sensor and even then,that's not necessarily bad depending on what you intend with the shot itself.

Here is another resource about it

http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.sekonic.com/images/files/HistogramsLightmetersWorkTogether.pdf&sa=U&ei=UaOqT4XRLMms0AGHh_ysBw&ved=0CBAQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNElEsihShQjOHkn4EMmvqf29uLHuA
The other poster is correct; there IS NO optimum h... (show quote)


Having trouble getting to web site - is there another address?
quote=rpavich The other poster is correct; there ... (show quote)


Here is the file:
quote=bioteacher quote=rpavich The other poster ... (show quote)


Thanks

Reply
May 10, 2012 11:05:09   #
CAM1017 Loc: Chiloquin, Oregon
 
Zenith701 wrote:
New to dslr so I don't really understand a lot. Is there an ideal shape for a histogram? In statistics a bell curve is kind of what you are trying for in dispersions. Is there something like this with histograms?


There is no such thing as an ideal histogram as there is no ideal photograph. A snow scene's histogram will look totally different for a photo taken of a coal miner in a mine. Looks for articles on Histograms in greater detail for more information.

Reply
May 10, 2012 12:40:25   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
Every historgram is different because of changing light. I make sure that my historgram is not touching either the left side or the right side, but to say the main peak is in the middle would be incorrect. DSLR's have light meters in them, use that also to get correct exposure (this can be 1/4-1/2 of stop to the left). Shooting many pictures and learning that connection between the light meter and the histogram is what it is all about. When you change lenses you may have to learn all this for that lens.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.