Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon
May 8, 2012 20:15:17 #
Any one have one/ have used one. I'm about to buy one. Anyone have one for sale? Comments about this lens Please :)
May 8, 2012 20:19:14 #
May 8, 2012 20:20:38 #
May 8, 2012 20:24:22 #
All of my L lenses have IS, but I'm sure it will work great without. It's just harder to hand hold for distant shots.
May 8, 2012 20:28:46 #
BigBear wrote:
All of my L lenses have IS, but I'm sure it will work great without. It's just harder to hand hold for distant shots.
Is lens is $2200, vs $1350 for w/o is. I use a tripod for long mm lenses anyway. All else being considered, should I be aware of any thing else... Going on 60D
May 8, 2012 20:29:26 #
I just got rid of one without IS.
Here are my (very short lived) observations:
1.) It's pretty heavy and large. You aren't going to swing it around like a 35mm lens.
2.) 2.8 isn't very fast so you are going to need decent light to get decent shutter speed and ISO.
3.) (this one is subjective; other people will disagree)I found the image quality to not be up to snuff with my other lenses. My other lenses are primes so you have to decide if "just pretty good" is good enough for you...it wasn't for me. I like L primes.
It's not a "walk around" lens in my opinion. It's a "put-on-a-tripod" sort of lens for me.
Others can give you their opinion; I'm sure that they will differ from mine, most people LOVE that lens.
Here is a video of a review between the non IS, the IS and the f/4 version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtODT5jJMHo
Here are my (very short lived) observations:
1.) It's pretty heavy and large. You aren't going to swing it around like a 35mm lens.
2.) 2.8 isn't very fast so you are going to need decent light to get decent shutter speed and ISO.
3.) (this one is subjective; other people will disagree)I found the image quality to not be up to snuff with my other lenses. My other lenses are primes so you have to decide if "just pretty good" is good enough for you...it wasn't for me. I like L primes.
It's not a "walk around" lens in my opinion. It's a "put-on-a-tripod" sort of lens for me.
Others can give you their opinion; I'm sure that they will differ from mine, most people LOVE that lens.
Here is a video of a review between the non IS, the IS and the f/4 version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtODT5jJMHo
May 8, 2012 20:31:05 #
I do love it.
I found it used for $1300. Maybe you can do the same. Some people upgrade to the nest best just because and trade in the older ones.
I found it used for $1300. Maybe you can do the same. Some people upgrade to the nest best just because and trade in the older ones.
May 8, 2012 20:48:37 #
rpavich wrote:
I just got rid of one without IS. br br Here are ... (show quote)
The lens I use most for a carry around is my 300 2.8 IS.
I use my 70-200 2.8 IS when I don't need or want the distance. Both take great pics.
May 8, 2012 21:25:39 #
BigBear wrote:
quote=rpavich I just got rid of one without IS. b... (show quote)
Just bought the 70-200 2.8 L IS
May 8, 2012 21:58:29 #
The Saint wrote:
Just bought the 70-200 2.8 L IS
Just bought the 70-200 2.8 L IS
Did you find a used one ?
Either way I think you made the right choice.
May 8, 2012 22:06:02 #
BigBear wrote:
Did you find a used one ?
Either way I think you made the right choice.
The Saint wrote:
Just bought the 70-200 2.8 L IS
Just bought the 70-200 2.8 L IS
Did you find a used one ?
Either way I think you made the right choice.
No, bought new, wanted the warranty and return policy.
Thanks for your input. I valued it and purchase accordingly :)
May 8, 2012 22:18:55 #
May 9, 2012 05:29:37 #
alggomas
Loc: Wales, United Kingdom.
This is probably the best lens you can get in this F and length.
If you have the money, fine. As commented before it is very heavy and has many switches.
I hope you enjoy using your new lens.
I have the f4L version. Very light and takes excellent photos. However you have to use the ISO mode on your camera to use in low light.
Th f2.8 with IS would be better in this situation.
If you have the money, fine. As commented before it is very heavy and has many switches.
I hope you enjoy using your new lens.
I have the f4L version. Very light and takes excellent photos. However you have to use the ISO mode on your camera to use in low light.
Th f2.8 with IS would be better in this situation.
May 9, 2012 06:27:17 #
I own the original version of this lens with IS and love it. It is a heavy lens as rpavich pointed out and is built like a tank! If I am walking around with this lens I use a shoulder strap to take the weight off my neck. One like this:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00508ZURU/ref=oh_details_o02_s00_i00
The f2.8 will allow you to use TC with it if you want.
Here is a review of this lens. They gave it a rating of 4.88 which is very high!
http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/lenses/canon_70-200_2p8_is_ii
Hope you enjoy it.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00508ZURU/ref=oh_details_o02_s00_i00
The f2.8 will allow you to use TC with it if you want.
Here is a review of this lens. They gave it a rating of 4.88 which is very high!
http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/lenses/canon_70-200_2p8_is_ii
Hope you enjoy it.
May 9, 2012 07:10:50 #
Tony B
Loc: Perth, Western Australia
70-200 f2.8 L IS vii is one of Canon's best lenses.
If you are shooting a lot of moving subjects IS not that important. For portraits & static subjects IS can be invaluable. Heavy lens but then all 2.8 lenses are. I have no problems carrying one all day & quite often do so along with a 300 f2.8 L IS. But then I always carry a load of gear so it is what I am used to. I am also nearer 70 than 60.
Whatever offering you choose in the 70-200 range is good & I have had them all. Depends whether f2.8 is important or not.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/
If you are shooting a lot of moving subjects IS not that important. For portraits & static subjects IS can be invaluable. Heavy lens but then all 2.8 lenses are. I have no problems carrying one all day & quite often do so along with a 300 f2.8 L IS. But then I always carry a load of gear so it is what I am used to. I am also nearer 70 than 60.
Whatever offering you choose in the 70-200 range is good & I have had them all. Depends whether f2.8 is important or not.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.