Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

42% said she shouldn't run if indicted...

50% said if indicted, she should only suspend her id found guilty.

(the 50% were probably thinking of that innocent-until-proven-guilty thing we used to hear about all the time.)

was that the true colors you were talking about?

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

The true colors of the colors of the demonic v**er. So let's take a look at this, from the report cover page.

"Among Democratic v**ers, 71% believe Clinton should keep running, a view shared by only 30% of Republicans and 46% of v**ers not affiliated with either major party.

Forty percent (40%) of all v**ers say they are less likely to v**e for Clinton because of the e-mail issue, while nearly half (48%) say it will have no impact on their v**e. Just eight percent (8%) say the issue makes them more likely to v**e for the former first lady.

Sixty-five percent (65%) consider it likely that Clinton broke the law by sending and receiving e-mails containing classified information through a private e-mail server while serving as secretary of State. This includes 47% who say it’s Very Likely. These findings are unchanged from January. Thirty percent (30%) still say Clinton is unlikely to have broken the law with the e-mail arrangement, with 16% who say it’s Not At All Likely. "


So..... 40% of v**ers say that they are less likely to v**e for Clinton because of the email issue, I would say that there are a few moderate demonics mixed in with a lot of independents and a handful of confused republicans who were never going to v**e for her anyway but wanted to take issue with the scandal.

48% say that it will have no impact on their v**e, I think that this is a split between hardcore demonics who would v**er for her under any circumstances even if she were to be convicted under the RICO Act as her foundation is tied to her official actions as SOS, and some honest republicans who had never had any intention of v****g for her so the scandal has no effect on their decision to not v**e for her.

47% say that it is very likely that Clinton has broken the law, again, a lot of republicans who understand the laws surrounding classified information and also understand Clinton's actions that broke those laws along with a lot of independents and a small mix of demonics thrown in.

Nixon's infractions in the Watergate scandal were very minor when compared to what Hillary has done with her server and most demonics realize this, she kept a private server simply to control what information would be available for FOIA inquiries as well as to destroy any record of her dealings in her official capacity on behalf of Bill and the foundation. People understand that in all probability that she was hacked by several governments and others, people also understand that she had a trove of classified information on that computer which in and of itself is against the law. What people also understand, republicans and demonics alike is that she has been lying to us all along, that none of her previous defenses in regard to her server can withstand scrutiny.

Fat Gregory Loc: Southern New Jersey

The treatment given Gen P was is harsh... Just treat H the same plus or minus based on the delta in her crime compared his...

One a great American hero and the other a bottom dwelling scum sucker..,

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

"(the 50% were probably thinking of that innocent-until-proven-guilty thing we used to hear about all the time.)"

Yea, it's getting trite now, isn't it, Blurry. The ole Constitution don't mean much any more.

I'm struck by how the Conservatives value the Constition--Their Constitution!--you know, Second Ammendment! at all that, but don't care for the Other Constitution, somebody else's constitution. Silly stuff, like innocent until proven guilty, and the like.

Freedom to take over government facilities like the Bundys do, but Damn that freedom to protest Wall Street, or protest over police murdering unarmed black males--well some freedom's are more important that others, right?

Bundy is fighting for "his Second Ammendment Rights" IN PRISON, for God's sake! He feels deprived of his right of peaceful assembly, probably just outside the jailhouse walls. While incarcerated, he has lost his Second Ammendment Rights! DAMN! Certainly he should be allowed to 'carry' while in jail, you know protect himself from criminals like...him?

How about 'fight to the death' for the right to v**e, while they 'fight nearly to the death' to keep B****s from v****g.

You guys got to watch those nasty ole Liberals--Innocent Until Proven Guilty Indeed!!!

Not when it's Hillary Clinton; she ain't got no friggin' constitution.

Save that thing for the Donald, the White Conservative Constitution, I mean. The Consstitution For White Guys With Guns.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

"Nixon's infractions in the Watergate scandal were very minor when compared to what Hillary has done with her server and most demonics realize this, she kept a private server simply to control what information would be available for FOIA inquiries as well as to destroy any record of her dealings in her official capacity on behalf of Bill and the foundation."

First of all Blurry, as I understand it, the Clinton Foundation has nothing to do with the scandal. If the Clinton's want a private server for their personal needs, it seems that is up to then, isn't it? Let's not cloud the waters with diversions.

Now, make the strongest charges you want about Hillary, and compare them to the Facts:


September 9, 1971: The White House “plumbers” unit – named for their orders to plug leaks in the administration – burglarizes a psychiatrist’s office to find files on Daniel Ellsberg, the former defense analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers.

June 17, 1972: Five men, one of whom says he used to work for the CIA, are arrested at 2:30 a.m. trying to bug the offices of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate hotel and office complex.

October 10, 1972: FBI agents establish that the Watergate break-in stems from a massive campaign of political spying and sabotage conducted on behalf of the Nixon ree******n effort, The Post reports.

June 13, 1973: Watergate prosecutors find a memo addressed to John Ehrlichman describing in detail the plans to burglarize the office of Pentagon Papers defendant Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist, The Post reports.

Now you can tell me what Hillary did that was worse than the above.

Fat Gregory Loc: Southern New Jersey

Wow... Mild when compared to the Clinton history (both B& H) right that's your point is it not???

Don't be r****t... Calling a citizen an Old White Man is just as r****t as calling an Old Black Man is it not.... Or do you believe that only W****s are r****t? When 95+% of a race v**es based on color, if Black it's cool if White it's r****t...
PS IMHO that stinks, all r****m stinks!!!

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Let me point out that v****g on the basis or race isn't r****t. Many things happen that involve information or race, but aren't denigrating. R****m is asserting the superiority or inferiority of one race compared to another.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Tom you are going off the deep end, do you really think that Hillary Clinton is innocent? For a man as smart as you are you sure can be a sucker. Answer this honestly Tom, how do you think that the Clintons amassed $200 million in wealth with over a billion more in their foundation that only spends 10% or so on charitable donations? I think it hilarious that Clinton is currently calling Trump a s**m artist. As far as her server goes, any thinking man or woman knows that she knew the rules and blew them off so that she could absolutely control her communications from both government investigation as well as FOIA requests.... Don't tell me that you are foolish enough to believe otherwise.... I am not suggesting that Hillary be thrown into jail without trial, but I am sure as hell saying that she has no business running for president.

As far as the rest of the tirade, conservatives have never tried to deny b****s the right to v**e, politicians have and honestly I am not sure which color, red or blue most republican politicians represent, maybe you have not noticed that there has been a revolt in the republican party, not because we think that Trump is some sort of Ronald Reagan, far from it, it is because the republican politicians have screwed republican v**ers for the last 20 or so years and finally someone came along who has had nothing to do with that rape.

Your white guys with guns comment is far beneath you.