The Pentagon’s dark money: Billions of federal dollars are vanishing into thin air
May 29, 2016 14:39:01 #
May 29, 2016 14:53:54 #
May 29, 2016 14:54:52 #
May 29, 2016 15:13:23 #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.salon.com/2016/05/28/the_pentagons_dark_money_billions_of_federal_dollars_are_vanishing_into_thin_air_partner/
Trillions going to welfare fraud makes this seem insignificant.
May 29, 2016 15:16:34 #
Architect1776 wrote:
Trillions going to welfare fraud makes this seem insignificant.
government fraud you meant.
May 29, 2016 15:16:51 #
Architect1776 wrote:
I know you have trouble with big numbers... the total cost of ALL welfare is $152 Billion.Trillions going to welfare fraud makes this seem insignificant.
Even if you assume that every penny of welfare goes towards fraud... then you are still off by a factor of 10.
May 29, 2016 15:20:36 #
May 29, 2016 15:37:11 #
Architect1776 wrote:
Synonymous
welfare nothin compared corporate welfare.
May 29, 2016 15:38:21 #
This has been going on for a long time.
On September 10, 2001, the day before the big attacks, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 Trillion with a 'T' of Pentagon money could not be accounted for. This is public record.
"Conveniently" the next day, the office of the Pentagon auditors was blown up, with what witnesses described were pre-planted explosives.
The evidence points to the fact that the department responsible for finding out what happened to the missing $2.3 Trillion was specifically targeted.
The Army Financial Audit Area
The Army's administrative, personnel and financial management/audit offices were the most heavily damaged areas with the highest number of casualties in the Pentagon attack; and nearly three dozen of the 125 Pentagon victims were auditors, accountants and budget analysts, all or almost all of whom worked in the Army area. The day before 9/11, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld had publicly announced that the Pentagon was "missing" -- that it allegedly could not account for -- $2.3 Trillion dollars. Some reports have given the amount as $2.6 Trillion. To put this number in perspective, after more than a decade, the total cost of both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is, according to some reports, approximately this same amount. Because of this, the question naturally arises: were the auditors in the Army area who were trying to "follow the money" -- and the computers that were helping them do it -- intentionally targeted by the inside explosives at the Pentagon on September 11th? The author was the first to suggest this possible nexus, in The Pentagon Attack Papers published in The Terror Conspiracy and The Terror Conspiracy Revisited by Jim Marrs. Recall also that the only fires seen by April Gallop, who told a conference audience that her office was not far from the Army auditors, were coming out of computers. Michael Nielsen, the Army financial auditor interviewed by the author, said that the auditors' computers could indeed have been targeted and that their records were, in any case, destroyed.
Similar to the heavily-damaged Army financial management/audit area, there is reason to suspect that the Naval Command Center intelligence cell was also targeted because it was looking into what could have become a financial scandal of major geopolitical proportions. A published analysis claims that the NCC intel cell was investigating $240 Billion in secret securities that had been illegally used to sabotage the Soviet Union's economy during the Cold War, that these securities were scheduled to become redeemable the day after the attacks, and that some of the financial entities involved in the covert securities had their offices and related records in the World Trade Center Towers. Given this context, it may prove important that Phillip Zelikow – a former member of President George H.W. Bush's National Security Council, a close colleague of and co-author with President George W. Bush's NSC Director Condolezza Rice, an expert in the creation and maintenance of "Myths of State" and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission which codified the "New Pearl Harbor" State Myth – headed the Harvard study that used the CIA's own documents to "exonerate" the agency of charges that the George H. W. Bush Team B politicized and fixed "intelligence" on the Soviet Union around its covert Cold War policy decisions. As one of the most secret policy decisions if this nexus were true would have been the use of hundreds of billions of dollars to sabotage the Soviet Union, Zelikow and George Bush Sr. would have shared a special interest in seeing that documents on this most sensitive of covert operations reportedly held by the Naval Command Center be destroyed. Zelikow also defended the "Myth of State" that the original WW II Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack in an amazon.com review of Robert Stinnett's ground-breaking book Day of Deceit, in which Stinnett exposed President Roosevelt's provocation of Japan, foreknowledge of the attack, and setting up Navy ships at Pearl Harbor as "sitting ducks" to ensure a "successful" attack.
In addition to geo-strategic and financial motives, there is yet another reason that the Naval Command Center's intelligence cell and adjacent also-damaged Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) offices may have been intentionally targeted: their likely participation in Able Danger, the Special Operations Command data-mining and analysis team that had identified two of the three "Al Qaeda" cells and four of the lead hijackers allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks including 'ringleader' Mohammed Atta over a year before Sept. 11 and which Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld shut down in late January 2001 immediately after taking command of the Pentagon.
Naval Command Center survivor Kevin Shaeffer's testimony is also strong evidence that the NCC explosion was a primary evet unrelated to any possible plane impact. He insisted that the massive orange fireball that destroyed the Center, which Lt. Cmdr. Tarantino described as "a bombed out office space [emphasis added]," happened "at precisely 9:43." As the official story claims that a plane impacted at 9:37:46, over five minutes before this, and that wh**ever allegedly penetrated through to the C Ring did so in less than one second, or by 9:37:47, even if the official story were true, Flight 77 could not have been the source of the Naval Command Center explosion and destruction at 9:43. The time difference between the first explosion, which we now know to have been at 9:30, and the NCC explosion at 9:43 also makes it likely that the "second huge explosion" heard and felt by Pentagon renovation team member Terry Cohen, which she said was "about 15 minutes later" [than the first], was the one which almost k**led Shaeffer in the NCC.
The Pentagon expected an attack on 9/11
Top Defense Department officials, including Secretary Donald Rumsfeld himself, not only expected but were preparing for some kind of attack on the Pentagon on 9/11. Shortly after the attacks, Newsweek reported that on Sept. 10, the day before, "a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns,"4b and on Sept. 11 Associated Press reported that "the Pentagon attack came [only] minutes after Rumsfeld predicted [having already learned of the attacks on the two World Trade Center towers], 'There will be another event.'"5 The source for Rumsfeld's "prediction" was Rep. Christopher Cox, who had been meeting with him in his office before the Pentagon attack. In another version, Cox reported that the Secretary had said, "Believe me, this isn't over yet. There's going to be another attack, and it could be us [the Pentagon]."4c Even earlier, before the first attack in New York City, at a breakfast Rumsfeld had called with his senior-most military officers and top civilian Pentagon officials including Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz and the military service chiefs, he "predicted" that a shocking world event would occur in the near future;4d then just as the breakfast was breaking up, the first WTC tower was hit.
https://www.911t***houtreach.org/557-news-releases/368-behind-the-smoke-curtain.html
Behind The Smoke Curtain:
what happened and what didn't happen at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001
Written by Barbara Honegger, M.S.
On September 10, 2001, the day before the big attacks, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 Trillion with a 'T' of Pentagon money could not be accounted for. This is public record.
"Conveniently" the next day, the office of the Pentagon auditors was blown up, with what witnesses described were pre-planted explosives.
The evidence points to the fact that the department responsible for finding out what happened to the missing $2.3 Trillion was specifically targeted.
The Army Financial Audit Area
The Army's administrative, personnel and financial management/audit offices were the most heavily damaged areas with the highest number of casualties in the Pentagon attack; and nearly three dozen of the 125 Pentagon victims were auditors, accountants and budget analysts, all or almost all of whom worked in the Army area. The day before 9/11, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld had publicly announced that the Pentagon was "missing" -- that it allegedly could not account for -- $2.3 Trillion dollars. Some reports have given the amount as $2.6 Trillion. To put this number in perspective, after more than a decade, the total cost of both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is, according to some reports, approximately this same amount. Because of this, the question naturally arises: were the auditors in the Army area who were trying to "follow the money" -- and the computers that were helping them do it -- intentionally targeted by the inside explosives at the Pentagon on September 11th? The author was the first to suggest this possible nexus, in The Pentagon Attack Papers published in The Terror Conspiracy and The Terror Conspiracy Revisited by Jim Marrs. Recall also that the only fires seen by April Gallop, who told a conference audience that her office was not far from the Army auditors, were coming out of computers. Michael Nielsen, the Army financial auditor interviewed by the author, said that the auditors' computers could indeed have been targeted and that their records were, in any case, destroyed.
Similar to the heavily-damaged Army financial management/audit area, there is reason to suspect that the Naval Command Center intelligence cell was also targeted because it was looking into what could have become a financial scandal of major geopolitical proportions. A published analysis claims that the NCC intel cell was investigating $240 Billion in secret securities that had been illegally used to sabotage the Soviet Union's economy during the Cold War, that these securities were scheduled to become redeemable the day after the attacks, and that some of the financial entities involved in the covert securities had their offices and related records in the World Trade Center Towers. Given this context, it may prove important that Phillip Zelikow – a former member of President George H.W. Bush's National Security Council, a close colleague of and co-author with President George W. Bush's NSC Director Condolezza Rice, an expert in the creation and maintenance of "Myths of State" and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission which codified the "New Pearl Harbor" State Myth – headed the Harvard study that used the CIA's own documents to "exonerate" the agency of charges that the George H. W. Bush Team B politicized and fixed "intelligence" on the Soviet Union around its covert Cold War policy decisions. As one of the most secret policy decisions if this nexus were true would have been the use of hundreds of billions of dollars to sabotage the Soviet Union, Zelikow and George Bush Sr. would have shared a special interest in seeing that documents on this most sensitive of covert operations reportedly held by the Naval Command Center be destroyed. Zelikow also defended the "Myth of State" that the original WW II Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack in an amazon.com review of Robert Stinnett's ground-breaking book Day of Deceit, in which Stinnett exposed President Roosevelt's provocation of Japan, foreknowledge of the attack, and setting up Navy ships at Pearl Harbor as "sitting ducks" to ensure a "successful" attack.
In addition to geo-strategic and financial motives, there is yet another reason that the Naval Command Center's intelligence cell and adjacent also-damaged Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) offices may have been intentionally targeted: their likely participation in Able Danger, the Special Operations Command data-mining and analysis team that had identified two of the three "Al Qaeda" cells and four of the lead hijackers allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks including 'ringleader' Mohammed Atta over a year before Sept. 11 and which Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld shut down in late January 2001 immediately after taking command of the Pentagon.
Naval Command Center survivor Kevin Shaeffer's testimony is also strong evidence that the NCC explosion was a primary evet unrelated to any possible plane impact. He insisted that the massive orange fireball that destroyed the Center, which Lt. Cmdr. Tarantino described as "a bombed out office space [emphasis added]," happened "at precisely 9:43." As the official story claims that a plane impacted at 9:37:46, over five minutes before this, and that wh**ever allegedly penetrated through to the C Ring did so in less than one second, or by 9:37:47, even if the official story were true, Flight 77 could not have been the source of the Naval Command Center explosion and destruction at 9:43. The time difference between the first explosion, which we now know to have been at 9:30, and the NCC explosion at 9:43 also makes it likely that the "second huge explosion" heard and felt by Pentagon renovation team member Terry Cohen, which she said was "about 15 minutes later" [than the first], was the one which almost k**led Shaeffer in the NCC.
The Pentagon expected an attack on 9/11
Top Defense Department officials, including Secretary Donald Rumsfeld himself, not only expected but were preparing for some kind of attack on the Pentagon on 9/11. Shortly after the attacks, Newsweek reported that on Sept. 10, the day before, "a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns,"4b and on Sept. 11 Associated Press reported that "the Pentagon attack came [only] minutes after Rumsfeld predicted [having already learned of the attacks on the two World Trade Center towers], 'There will be another event.'"5 The source for Rumsfeld's "prediction" was Rep. Christopher Cox, who had been meeting with him in his office before the Pentagon attack. In another version, Cox reported that the Secretary had said, "Believe me, this isn't over yet. There's going to be another attack, and it could be us [the Pentagon]."4c Even earlier, before the first attack in New York City, at a breakfast Rumsfeld had called with his senior-most military officers and top civilian Pentagon officials including Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz and the military service chiefs, he "predicted" that a shocking world event would occur in the near future;4d then just as the breakfast was breaking up, the first WTC tower was hit.
https://www.911t***houtreach.org/557-news-releases/368-behind-the-smoke-curtain.html
Behind The Smoke Curtain:
what happened and what didn't happen at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001
Written by Barbara Honegger, M.S.
May 29, 2016 15:52:54 #
May 29, 2016 15:54:42 #
Keenan wrote:
This has been going on for a long time. br br On ... (show quote)
It's even deeper than this
May 30, 2016 08:33:24 #
Architect1776 wrote:
Trillions going to welfare fraud makes this seem insignificant.
Where do you get that number "trillions" in fraud? The total budget for welfare in 2016 federal,state and local is 1,066 billion. Where there's money there's fraud, but I think trillion is an exageration.
May 30, 2016 11:03:13 #
steve03 wrote:
Where do you get that number "trillions" in fraud? The total budget for welfare in 2016 federal,state and local is 1,066 billion. Where there's money there's fraud, but I think trillion is an exageration.
he jacks himself up. lol
May 30, 2016 11:14:29 #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.salon.com/2016/05/28/the_pentagons_dark_money_billions_of_federal_dollars_are_vanishing_into_thin_air_partner/
DIRTBAGGER’S EXTREME LEFT WINGNUT BULLS**T SPAM ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!! NEVER ONE WORD OF T***H. PABLUM FOR PERVERTS, PEDEPHILES AND PINHEADS
May 30, 2016 11:21:23 #
Checkmate wrote:
DIRTBAGGER’S EXTREME LEFT WINGNUT BULLS**T SPAM ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!! NEVER ONE WORD OF T***H. PABLUM FOR PERVERTS, PEDEPHILES AND PINHEADS
thanks for showing up troll boi. lol
better go check your beans, they boiling.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.