Under The Boardwalk
May 21, 2016 11:55:10 #
jaysnave wrote:
This is Myrtle Beach just to give you an idea if you want to go this direction. The wedding party is covering up a really bad picture of me while on vacation there 2 years ago. I used WG's enhanced version.
No image?
May 21, 2016 15:10:04 #
May 23, 2016 06:42:09 #
jaysnave,
Nice rendition.
Thanks,
Bill
Nice rendition.
Thanks,
Bill
jaysnave wrote:
Guess not. I'll try again...
May 23, 2016 09:06:28 #
jaysnave wrote:
Guess not. I'll try again...
I think I'd warm it up a little. Kind of a strange color cast on my monitor.
(or is it just me?)
May 23, 2016 09:14:43 #
bkyser wrote:
I think I'd warm it up a little. Kind of a strange color cast on my monitor.
(or is it just me?)
(or is it just me?)
No, not you. It needs work if it will be a final rendition. I just wanted to see what would be possible. I would recommend taking a new shot of the beach for a composite perhaps with more beach viewable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
May 23, 2016 18:29:41 #
Well,
I have these:
I have these:
jaysnave wrote:
No, not you. It needs work if it will be a final rendition. I just wanted to see what would be possible. I would recommend taking a new shot of the beach for a composite perhaps with more beach viewable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
May 23, 2016 18:32:55 #
Jay,
Have not figured out how to send more than one attachment at a time.
Here is another:
Bill
Have not figured out how to send more than one attachment at a time.
Here is another:
Bill
jaysnave wrote:
No, not you. It needs work if it will be a final rendition. I just wanted to see what would be possible. I would recommend taking a new shot of the beach for a composite perhaps with more beach viewable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
May 23, 2016 18:42:18 #
Well,
Guess I also can't even send one.
I'm getting error code 101. What am I doing wrong?
Bill
Guess I also can't even send one.
I'm getting error code 101. What am I doing wrong?
Bill
jaysnave wrote:
No, not you. It needs work if it will be a final rendition. I just wanted to see what would be possible. I would recommend taking a new shot of the beach for a composite perhaps with more beach viewable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
May 23, 2016 18:47:19 #
dadcowell wrote:
Well,
Guess I also can't even send one.
I'm getting error code 101. What am I doing wrong?
Bill
Guess I also can't even send one.
I'm getting error code 101. What am I doing wrong?
Bill
The new system requires an extra step . . . 1) choose file 2) click on "store original" 3)click on "add attachment 4) although you see the pictures on your end you still have to click on "send"
May 23, 2016 18:58:57 #
I did all of those steps, but here is another try:
Weddingguy wrote:
The new system requires an extra step . . . 1) choose file 2) click on "store original" 3)click on "add attachment 4) although you see the pictures on your end you still have to click on "send"
May 23, 2016 19:19:34 #
dadcowell wrote:
I did all of those steps, but here is another try:
Another try ... .
May 23, 2016 20:07:55 #
Here is another Myrtle Beach photo. It is somewhat under exposed as you can see.
jaysnave wrote:
No, not you. It needs work if it will be a final rendition. I just wanted to see what would be possible. I would recommend taking a new shot of the beach for a composite perhaps with more beach viewable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
Bill, did you take any on the beach? Even if blown out they might be savable.
May 23, 2016 20:42:28 #
dadcowell wrote:
Here is another Myrtle Beach photo. It is somewhat under exposed as you can see.
Better I think ... I prefer the darker background personally.
May 23, 2016 20:55:39 #
dadcowell wrote:
Here is another Myrtle Beach photo. It is somewhat under exposed as you can see.
I played with the sky & beach, but underexposed may be better. Also rotated the cutout a bit trying to get the girls on camera right down to the same level. I don't know, I am having PS block. You know like writers block...
May 23, 2016 21:18:38 #
Jay,
I like both, but may print the lighter one for the bride.
The wedding was in the middle of the day and the sun was blazing, so it is more realistic. I also took that picture at the same beach, but because I was there at about 7:00 am, the beach was empty. Ofcouse when I took the wedding picture on Saturday at 4:00, the beach was crowded.
Thanks for all your help.
Bill
I like both, but may print the lighter one for the bride.
The wedding was in the middle of the day and the sun was blazing, so it is more realistic. I also took that picture at the same beach, but because I was there at about 7:00 am, the beach was empty. Ofcouse when I took the wedding picture on Saturday at 4:00, the beach was crowded.
Thanks for all your help.
Bill
jaysnave wrote:
I played with the sky & beach, but underexposed may be better. Also rotated the cutout a bit trying to get the girls on camera right down to the same level. I don't know, I am having PS block. You know like writers block...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.