Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Was she right?
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 2, 2016 06:35:03   #
viscountdriver Loc: East Kent UK
 
I bought a used Nikon D5300 on Ebay which the lady had advertised as hardly used.A shutter count showed the count was 6000. I queried this with the lady who sold it as to whether that constituted hardly used.
She claimed it was just 5% of the probable life of the camera and therefore was hardly used,
Was she right?

Reply
May 2, 2016 06:39:57   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
viscountdriver wrote:
I bought a used Nikon D5300 on Ebay which the lady had advertised as hardly used.A shutter count showed the count was 6000. I queried this with the lady who sold it as to whether that constituted hardly used.
She claimed it was just 5% of the probable life of the camera and therefore was hardly used,
Was she right?

If I were selling it, I wouldn't use the term "hardly used." That would be under 1,000. "Moderate use" would be more accurate. You should be able to return it and look for another. I have never bid on an ebay camera without getting an exact shutter count. When I sell a camera, I give the exact count.

Reply
May 2, 2016 06:50:13   #
Erv Loc: Medina Ohio
 
I think Jerry nailed it.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2016 07:36:57   #
Jim Bob
 
viscountdriver wrote:
I bought a used Nikon D5300 on Ebay which the lady had advertised as hardly used.A shutter count showed the count was 6000. I queried this with the lady who sold it as to whether that constituted hardly used.
She claimed it was just 5% of the probable life of the camera and therefore was hardly used,
Was she right?


As I recall, Nikon provides a shutter rating of 100,000 cycles for the 5300. Whether 6000 is "hardly used" is arguably a matter of interpretation. My advice: secure exact count before future purchases and consider Cameta Camera which frequently offers a free 1 year warranty on factory refurbished models.

Reply
May 2, 2016 07:42:43   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
I would classify 6% of life expectancy as lightly used.

Reply
May 2, 2016 07:49:01   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
viscountdriver wrote:
I bought a used Nikon D5300 on Ebay which the lady had advertised as hardly used.A shutter count showed the count was 6000. I queried this with the lady who sold it as to whether that constituted hardly used.
She claimed it was just 5% of the probable life of the camera and therefore was hardly used,
Was she right?


It could be 5% or even less but also likely closer to 10% or more. You can't predict an individual camera.

How does the price compare to a refurbished D5300?

Reply
May 2, 2016 08:10:48   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
viscountdriver wrote:
I bought a used Nikon D5300 on Ebay which the lady had advertised as hardly used.A shutter count showed the count was 6000. I queried this with the lady who sold it as to whether that constituted hardly used.
She claimed it was just 5% of the probable life of the camera and therefore was hardly used,
Was she right?


Individual results will vary, hence 'probable', but 6000 is 6% of 100,000. Personally, I would consider under 1000 'like new', and 5000-10,000 slightly used.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2016 09:05:09   #
insman1132 Loc: Southwest Florida
 
You can worry about this issue or you can move on and enjoy your camera. That camera has lots of shutter clicks available. Enjoy your camera.

Reply
May 2, 2016 09:17:03   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
Agree 150 percent. Enjoy the camera or return it.
insman1132 wrote:
You can worry about this issue or you can move on and enjoy your camera. That camera has lots of shutter clicks available. Enjoy your camera.

Reply
May 2, 2016 09:22:50   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
insman1132 wrote:
You can worry about this issue or you can move on and enjoy your camera. That camera has lots of shutter clicks available. Enjoy your camera.



:thumbup:
I'm sure you paid less than you would have for new. I know when you first heard it 6000 sounded like a lot, but its not, relatively speaking.

Reply
May 2, 2016 09:25:45   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
She may have stretched the semantics a bit. However, is the camera in good working order? You've lost 6% of the life of the camera. What percent did you save over a new camera?

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2016 11:11:02   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
insman1132 wrote:
Enjoy your camera.


:thumbup:

Reply
May 2, 2016 11:31:25   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
The first time there is any sort of glitch with the camera, you'll regret not returning it. :D

Actually, that's a low shutter count, and she probably didn't have any idea how many times the button had been pushed. "Large," "small," "few," and "lots" are very vague terms. Numbers are exact.

Remember the end of "Fargo"? "And it's such a beautiful day." :D

Reply
May 2, 2016 12:09:46   #
viscountdriver Loc: East Kent UK
 
I paid 10% less than new so I guess I wasn't done.The camera works fine.

Reply
May 3, 2016 07:15:29   #
SonyBug
 
viscountdriver wrote:
I paid 10% less than new so I guess I wasn't done.The camera works fine.



I think you overpaid. Considering that there is no warranty and I have had to have Nikon service my last 3 high dollar cameras under warranty. I would return it and buy new for an extra 10% or buy a refurb.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.