A few from D500 with 300mmf/4E
Apr 30, 2016 10:11:00 #
Took these with no lens filter or lens hood, hand held.
GHO owlet/ ISO-500, F/8, 1/1600, 78', crop to 9.1mp.
(Download)
Mama or Papa owl, not sure which. ISO-160,f/4.5, 1/500, 49', crop to 4.4mp
(Download)
Golf shot, middle of 30 shot burst, 3sec. ISO-160, f/6.3, 1/1600, 122', no crop 20.7mp
(Download)
Quail, ISO-3200, F/8, 1/1600/ 22', crop to 9.2mp
(Download)
Apr 30, 2016 10:21:19 #
Nice set. I held the D500 in my hands I want one. lol The owner I hope will let me try it out some time
Apr 30, 2016 10:25:46 #
Apr 30, 2016 10:33:33 #
Which version of the 300mm F4 is that ? The AF or the AFS version ?
Apr 30, 2016 10:37:30 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Which version of the 300mm F4 is that ? The AF or the AFS version ?
The F4E would be an AF-s with VR and electronically controlled aperture.
--
Apr 30, 2016 10:46:20 #
NJFrank wrote:
Nice set. I held the D500 in my hands I want one. lol The owner I hope will let me try it out some time
Thank you NJFrank, so far so good.
Apr 30, 2016 10:46:45 #
Jim Carter wrote:
Excellent series!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you Jim
Apr 30, 2016 10:47:09 #
howlynn wrote:
Took these with no lens filter or lens hood, hand held.
The last image has some spots in the background. That isn't a dirty sensor is it? I'd be a little concerned knowing Nikon sensor track record.
Apr 30, 2016 10:47:36 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Which version of the 300mm F4 is that ? The AF or the AFS version ?
AFS
Apr 30, 2016 10:49:19 #
Bill_de wrote:
The F4E would be an AF-s with VR and electronically controlled aperture.
--
--
and diffractive elements ...
Apr 30, 2016 10:50:41 #
Bill_de wrote:
The F4E would be an AF-s with VR and electronically controlled aperture.
--
--
Thank you for taking a look Bill, the new 300mm f/4 prime is a sweet lens.
Apr 30, 2016 10:51:50 #
imagemeister wrote:
and diffractive elements ...
Stunning shot of the Owl parent ! - needs a bit more exposure tho - IMO.
Apr 30, 2016 10:53:56 #
jeep_daddy wrote:
The last image has some spots in the background. That isn't a dirty sensor is it? I'd be a little concerned knowing Nikon sensor track record.
Good catch Jeep_daddy, It was snowing lightly in this shot.
Apr 30, 2016 10:55:51 #
:thumbup: Good photos, the tight owl shot is very sharp but too bad that branch is in front of him. If you don't have the capability to remove the branch I know there is someone here that will do it for you if you make a request!
Apr 30, 2016 11:03:30 #
imagemeister wrote:
Stunning shot of the Owl parent ! - needs a bit more exposure tho - IMO.
Thank you Imagemeister for taking a look, I process the Raw version in Lightroom/photoshop for any shot I might want to print, I'll keep your exposure tip in mind. Thanks.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.