Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
HDR Photography -- Before and After
Another from Virginia City: Raw, PP, HDR comparison
Apr 12, 2016 08:30:01   #
kymarto Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
 
Thought you folks might be interested in this. First is a "before" frame of a grave in the historic graveyard. This is a jpg made straight from the raw file, with no adjustments.

Second is the best I can do with simple PP in Photoshop and ACR. It's not bad, but don't forget that this is with a Nikon D800 with over 14 EV of DR. You won't get near this with most cameras.

Last is HDR done in Photomatix and then PP'ed in Photoshop. No question about which I like the best.

That being said, I do want to point out that even in this extreme lighting situation, HDR is only a click above single-frame processed. I notice that a lot of people waste time and energy making a multiple-frame HDR, when actually with a bit of processing knowledge they would achieve as good or better results (no ghosting! moving subjects!) with a properly exposed single frame.

Jpg from raw, SOOC
Jpg from raw, SOOC...
(Download)

Raw with PP, single frame
Raw with PP, single frame...
(Download)

HDR, 7 EV with PP
HDR, 7 EV with PP...
(Download)

Reply
Apr 12, 2016 09:31:11   #
MT native Loc: Big Sky Country — Montana
 
Virginia City is not far from where I live. A good place for HDR images as you know. I am into simplicity when it comes to HDR. That is why I luse NIK Collection. I like your #3 photo. Nice work. And thanks for sharing.

Reply
Apr 13, 2016 06:34:03   #
waltchilds Loc: Central Florida
 
kymarto wrote:
Thought you folks might be interested in this. First is a "before" frame of a grave in the historic graveyard. This is a jpg made straight from the raw file, with no adjustments.

Second is the best I can do with simple PP in Photoshop and ACR. It's not bad, but don't forget that this is with a Nikon D800 with over 14 EV of DR. You won't get near this with most cameras.

Last is HDR done in Photomatix and then PP'ed in Photoshop. No question about which I like the best.

That being said, I do want to point out that even in this extreme lighting situation, HDR is only a click above single-frame processed. I notice that a lot of people waste time and energy making a multiple-frame HDR, when actually with a bit of processing knowledge they would achieve as good or better results (no ghosting! moving subjects!) with a properly exposed single frame.
Thought you folks might be interested in this. Fir... (show quote)


You make a very good point here. I always try to process the photo from a single raw file and have been able to come up with the HDR effect most of the time.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2016 10:31:42   #
MWojton Loc: Yardley, PA
 
Thanks for posting. There is very little difference between 2 and 3- with a lot less work!

Reply
Apr 13, 2016 11:12:22   #
SoHillGuy Loc: Washington
 
I like the contents of the photo. RE: #3 adjust the white balance and increase the contrast.

Reply
Apr 13, 2016 11:45:05   #
kymarto Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
 
The point is really in the clouds. Even with 14+ EV of DR, you lose the last three or so EV of highlights. Had I underexposed another couple of stops I would have had detail in the clouds, but at the expense of horrible noise in the darks and a lack of contrast down there. But if you are shooting a normal day scene, not backlit, as a lot of folks do--bracketing for HDR--it's just a waste of time and energy, as the same results can be had from a single frame.

I think that many people use HDR programs incorrectly, or at least superfluously, in order to oversaturate and increase shadow detail, and they think that is HDR. But the fact is that in at least 50% of the cases I've seen with people doing HDR processing, the same result--or in some cases a better result--could be had with a single frame processed in ACR or Lightroom. Topaz makes a plugin called "Clarity" that has a "microcontrast" slider that pretty perfectly mimics the tonal impact that many people associate with HDR.

Reply
Apr 13, 2016 11:46:25   #
DickC Loc: NE Washington state
 
Nice photos, like #3!
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2016 13:38:04   #
donolea Loc: Nashville, TN
 
Love the shots! I spent 10 years in Reno and this cemetery was my favorite places to shoot when I was down in Virginia City. BTW, completely agree with your take on HDR.

Reply
Apr 23, 2016 20:58:23   #
joe west Loc: Taylor, Michigan
 
kymarto wrote:
Thought you folks might be interested in this. First is a "before" frame of a grave in the historic graveyard. This is a jpg made straight from the raw file, with no adjustments.

Second is the best I can do with simple PP in Photoshop and ACR. It's not bad, but don't forget that this is with a Nikon D800 with over 14 EV of DR. You won't get near this with most cameras.

Last is HDR done in Photomatix and then PP'ed in Photoshop. No question about which I like the best.

That being said, I do want to point out that even in this extreme lighting situation, HDR is only a click above single-frame processed. I notice that a lot of people waste time and energy making a multiple-frame HDR, when actually with a bit of processing knowledge they would achieve as good or better results (no ghosting! moving subjects!) with a properly exposed single frame.
Thought you folks might be interested in this. Fir... (show quote)


last one is :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
HDR Photography -- Before and After
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.