Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
How is that Iranian agreement workin out for ya!
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Apr 4, 2016 10:07:16   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/04/04/us-seizes-thousands-iranian-weapons-including-grenade-launchers-in-arabian-sea.html :roll:

Reply
Apr 4, 2016 10:19:13   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
idaholover wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/04/04/us-seizes-thousands-iranian-weapons-including-grenade-launchers-in-arabian-sea.html :roll:


I think it was just a day or 2 ago that pony-f*g boy was harping on how much safer we are now...go figure????

Reply
Apr 4, 2016 12:10:33   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
wilpharm wrote:
I think it was just a day or 2 ago that pony-f*g boy was harping on how much safer we are now...go figure????


Yeah. He "demanded" proof or a "credible source" that the Iran deal wasn't unicorns and puppies like he blindly believes. When that was provided he disappeared and started another thread. Such a _______. (insert any of numerous applicable derogatory labels.)

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2016 12:14:12   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
wilpharm wrote:
I think it was just a day or 2 ago that pony-f*g boy was harping on how much safer we are now...go figure????


Yikes! Another liberal screw-up.

Reply
Apr 4, 2016 14:33:24   #
Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
 
idaholover wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/04/04/us-seizes-thousands-iranian-weapons-including-grenade-launchers-in-arabian-sea.html :roll:


If you had ead your own reference, then you would know that the weapons seized had nothing to due with the Iran nuke deal.But the title of your thread links these two when there is no link.

No one ever said the the Iranians are positive actors in the world. Show some non compliance with the actual deal that you reference and your title might make some sense. But trying to link things that are not linked is bush league and shows your deep paucity of critical thinking.

Reply
Apr 4, 2016 15:00:01   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
Bazbo wrote:
If you had ead your own reference, then you would know that the weapons seized had nothing to due with the Iran nuke deal.But the title of your thread links these two when there is no link.

No one ever said the the Iranians are positive actors in the world. Show some non compliance with the actual deal that you reference and your title might make some sense. But trying to link things that are not linked is bush league and shows your deep paucity of critical thinking.


So there are two Irans? Huh, I was a geography major so I must have been asleep that day in class. Another thing I never was abe to grasp was the shear arrogance and condescention that you humongous intellectuals like moabass, KKKeenan and you, bobozzo, are able to display on a reply to a post that had nothing to do with attacking you.

Reply
Apr 4, 2016 18:07:19   #
Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
 
idaholover wrote:
So there are two Irans? Huh, I was a geography major so I must have been asleep that day in class. Another thing I never was abe to grasp was the shear arrogance and condescention that you humongous intellectuals like moabass, KKKeenan and you, bobozzo, are able to display on a reply to a post that had nothing to do with attacking you.


OMG...you are so out of ideas.

“Iranians” as in Iranian people not multiple countries. As in when someone makes a references to “Americans” no one who understands first grade English thinks the reference is to multiple countries. Kind of embarrassing to have to explain that to you, but someone has to do it I guess.

And I don’t think I accused you of attacking me, did I? Try responding to what I actually say and not to what you wish I had said.

And as always, not responding to my point but instead reverting to the standard issue name calling is only for the weak, as you should know by now. But then, you are a slow learner.

Why don’t you post over on Storm Front? Those half wits will think that yo are a certifiable genius. Here...not so much.

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2016 18:29:52   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
Bazbo wrote:
OMG...you are so out of ideas.

“Iranians” as in Iranian people not multiple countries. As in when someone makes a references to “Americans” no one who understands first grade English thinks the reference is to multiple countries. Kind of embarrassing to have to explain that to you, but someone has to do it I guess.

And I don’t think I accused you of attacking me, did I? Try responding to what I actually say and not to what you wish I had said.

And as always, not responding to my point but instead reverting to the standard issue name calling is only for the weak, as you should know by now. But then, you are a slow learner.

Why don’t you post over on Storm Front? Those half wits will think that yo are a certifiable genius. Here...not so much.
OMG...you are so out of ideas. br br “Iranians” a... (show quote)


Thank you for proving my point to a tee!
As always, the arrogant asshole Bobozo!

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:02:11   #
Zophman Loc: Northwest
 
Ahhhh.....let's see. Iran has 100+ billion in cash to spend. And they are recognized as the world leader for supporting terrorism....and they get caught red handed doing this.....and the left really thinks the Iranian deal was a good deal? we are so screwed.....

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:08:09   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Zophman wrote:
Ahhhh.....let's see. Iran has 100+ billion in cash to spend. And they are recognized as the world leader for supporting terrorism....and they get caught red handed doing this.....and the left really thinks the Iranian deal was a good deal? we are so screwed.....


The Iranian nuclear deal did not address anything other than Iran's ability to build nukes. What part of this do you not understand?

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:34:34   #
Zophman Loc: Northwest
 
Keenan wrote:
The Iranian nuclear deal did not address anything other than Iran's ability to build nukes. What part of this do you not understand?


Just seems like such a s**tty deal for us. The part I don't understand is why would our government sell us down the river? Oh, and why would we cave in to only such a one sided deal? And of course there is, the trustworthiness of Iran. Do YOU really believe that a terroist nation like Iran will actually keep their word? If you do, you are as a big a fool as Obama and Kerry! Words (which you defend) are so much different than actions. Open your eyes you dimwit!

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2016 00:35:35   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
Keenan wrote:
The Iranian nuclear deal did not address anything other than Iran's ability to build nukes. What part of this do you not understand?


And it's doing a bang-up job of that... such a deal.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/after-bomb-test-north-korea-iran-continue-illicit-nuke-cooperation/

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:39:34   #
Zophman Loc: Northwest
 
Keenan wrote:
The Iranian nuclear deal did not address anything other than Iran's ability to build nukes. What part of this do you not understand?


And given the chance to really make the world safer, it has past us by. I just hope that as you fry in a nuclear detonation that you will see the face of God and he acknowledges that you truly are an asshole.

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:41:52   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Zophman wrote:
Just seems like such a s**tty deal for us. The part I don't understand is why would our government sell us down the river? Oh, and why would we cave in to only such a one sided deal? And of course there is, the trustworthiness of Iran. Do YOU really believe that a terroist nation like Iran will actually keep their word? If you do, you are as a big a fool as Obama and Kerry! Words (which you defend) are so much different than actions. Open your eyes you dimwit!


You don't understand the importance of a deal that keeps Iran from building nukes? If you really don't think keeping Iran from building nukes is useful, then I don't know what to tell you.

Reply
Apr 5, 2016 00:46:28   #
Zophman Loc: Northwest
 
Keenan wrote:
You don't understand the importance of a deal that keeps Iran from building nukes? If you really don't think keeping Iran from building nukes is useful, then I don't know what to tell you.


I believe we just kicked the can down the road. And, Iran has not demonstrated any level of integrity to any agreement in the past. What will they change now? as you are always spouting facts and data, please try to convince us how Iran is now, all of the sudden, willing to honor any agreement? Are we revisiting North Korea during the Clinton administration? Poor little fool you are.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.