Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon 100m 2.8 macro?
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 3, 2012 01:51:13   #
travlnman46 Loc: Yakima WA
 
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
I am kicking around the idea of a Macro lens. Looking at Canon 100m 2.8 also Tamron 90m 2.8. Been reading reviews for weeks. Anyone used either?
I will be using it on Canon 30D & 50D cameras and will probably end up taking mostly portraits. Altho, I will be doing some Macro. I have lenses that go mac, but do want a Mac only! thanks


Hi SENSORLOUPE: I recently purchased a used Canon 100 2.8 USM Macro lens for $375 . I love it, I have been practicing shooting macro pictures with it. I posted one on UHH a few days ago of a spider. The results were OK but I'm still learning. The lens classified as a true macro, meaning it will shoot at 1:1 or life size. However it is also able to shoot at infinity. Canon actually manufactures three different 100 macro lenses. One like I purchased with usm, one with both usm and IS and one with out either. Hope this helps.
quote=SENSORLOUPE I am kicking around the idea of... (show quote)


Thanks--I am looking at the USM version--but it is priced 559.00
where might I view the spider? Would love to see it
quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSORLOUPE I am kicking... (show quote)


Hi SENSORLOUPE: Under the heading "Ugly Hedgehog- Photography Forum" is a group of words third from the left is the word "search." type in "wolf spider?" and the forum will come up... You can see it there... Not the greatest picture but I'm still learning.

Reply
May 3, 2012 02:08:07   #
travlnman46 Loc: Yakima WA
 
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


Hi again SENSORLOUPE: Actually the Canon Macro 100mm is a good portrait lens. Here is a great website that covers all of Canon's lenses, by usage and quality. http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html Hope this helps.

Reply
May 3, 2012 03:40:09   #
Michael O' Loc: Midwest right now
 
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
RocketScientist wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


For portraits an 85 would work great, not too close, not too far. I have the 100mm 2.8 IS USM. It is a great lens. Great macro shots, very good portraits. Lately I've been doing panning practice with it as it lets me keep a safe distance from the cars I practice on.
quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks everyone!! the camera ... (show quote)


Thank you :-)
quote=RocketScientist quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks e... (show quote)


Senserloupe : Now I see another factor thrown into the analysis. I believe you now have mentioned that you will do some "bug shots", but that you will do more portrait photography with it. I believe the 100 mentioned is the best macro shooting lens, but if your use will be primarily portrait work, I submit that the bug shots will be of less critical interest to you AND to your subjects than the portraits. In that case, 85 mm is considered the ideal length to provide the best-looking reproductions of face and/or torso. The finest lens Canon makes for portraiture, and one of the very best in the world, barring none, is their EF 85mm f/1.2L USM. I have had mine for over 10 years, and find it beautiful to work with not only because of its super sharp images with virtually no flare even at maximum aperture, but the floating system corrects coma for high image quality, and the maximum aperture is the fastest telephoto in its class, giving it the ability to capture good images even in very low light, especially useful when you are doing natural light portraiture in outdoor scenic conditions -- which can utilize natural greenery (evergreen and leaf trees, shrubs, etc.) to create delightful, relaxed, and soft enticing photos, especially of the female sex, or paired with such as boyfriends or engaged partners. Shots I do with such subjects are regularly cherished by the subjects over the sterile, cold, and stereotyped studio images commonly cranked out. I have had the use of 32 top lenses for Linhof, Leica, Nikon, Rollie, Contax, and Canon over the years, and the 85mm f i.2 L
has been the most cherished of them all. It is the "old reliable" which
always results in a delightful shot with great resolution in anything but utter darkness. It is an artful reliable workhorse, but pricey. Check it out with B&H. If it is more that you wish to spend, try to find a good used one, although I can't imagine that anyone who has used one would want to part with it; but worth a search, beginning with the good folks at B&H. Call Canon @ 1-800 / 652-2666 and have them send to you their "EF Lenses FOR EOS cameras" booklet, which gives a fully detailed and diagrammed description of all of them. Good information!
Good luck ! Michael O' soccermick33@yahoo.com

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2012 08:51:17   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
Michael O' wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
RocketScientist wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


For portraits an 85 would work great, not too close, not too far. I have the 100mm 2.8 IS USM. It is a great lens. Great macro shots, very good portraits. Lately I've been doing panning practice with it as it lets me keep a safe distance from the cars I practice on.
quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks everyone!! the camera ... (show quote)


Thank you :-)
quote=RocketScientist quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks e... (show quote)


Senserloupe : Now I see another factor thrown into the analysis. I believe you now have mentioned that you will do some "bug shots", but that you will do more portrait photography with it. I believe the 100 mentioned is the best macro shooting lens, but if your use will be primarily portrait work, I submit that the bug shots will be of less critical interest to you AND to your subjects than the portraits. In that case, 85 mm is considered the ideal length to provide the best-looking reproductions of face and/or torso. The finest lens Canon makes for portraiture, and one of the very best in the world, barring none, is their EF 85mm f/1.2L USM. I have had mine for over 10 years, and find it beautiful to work with not only because of its super sharp images with virtually no flare even at maximum aperture, but the floating system corrects coma for high image quality, and the maximum aperture is the fastest telephoto in its class, giving it the ability to capture good images even in very low light, especially useful when you are doing natural light portraiture in outdoor scenic conditions -- which can utilize natural greenery (evergreen and leaf trees, shrubs, etc.) to create delightful, relaxed, and soft enticing photos, especially of the female sex, or paired with such as boyfriends or engaged partners. Shots I do with such subjects are regularly cherished by the subjects over the sterile, cold, and stereotyped studio images commonly cranked out. I have had the use of 32 top lenses for Linhof, Leica, Nikon, Rollie, Contax, and Canon over the years, and the 85mm f i.2 L
has been the most cherished of them all. It is the "old reliable" which
always results in a delightful shot with great resolution in anything but utter darkness. It is an artful reliable workhorse, but pricey. Check it out with B&H. If it is more that you wish to spend, try to find a good used one, although I can't imagine that anyone who has used one would want to part with it; but worth a search, beginning with the good folks at B&H. Call Canon @ 1-800 / 652-2666 and have them send to you their "EF Lenses FOR EOS cameras" booklet, which gives a fully detailed and diagrammed description of all of them. Good information!
Good luck ! Michael O' soccermick33@yahoo.com
quote=SENSORLOUPE quote=RocketScientist quote=S... (show quote)


Wow! lots of info--thank you so much. Portraits are my favorite to shoot, so didn't want to get stuck with Macro only lens. But I guess portraits of "bugs" would count as portraits! thanks again for your time--

Reply
May 3, 2012 08:53:53   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
I am kicking around the idea of a Macro lens. Looking at Canon 100m 2.8 also Tamron 90m 2.8. Been reading reviews for weeks. Anyone used either?
I will be using it on Canon 30D & 50D cameras and will probably end up taking mostly portraits. Altho, I will be doing some Macro. I have lenses that go mac, but do want a Mac only! thanks


Hi SENSORLOUPE: I recently purchased a used Canon 100 2.8 USM Macro lens for $375 . I love it, I have been practicing shooting macro pictures with it. I posted one on UHH a few days ago of a spider. The results were OK but I'm still learning. The lens classified as a true macro, meaning it will shoot at 1:1 or life size. However it is also able to shoot at infinity. Canon actually manufactures three different 100 macro lenses. One like I purchased with usm, one with both usm and IS and one with out either. Hope this helps.
quote=SENSORLOUPE I am kicking around the idea of... (show quote)


Thanks--I am looking at the USM version--but it is priced 559.00
where might I view the spider? Would love to see it
quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSORLOUPE I am kicking... (show quote)


Hi SENSORLOUPE: Under the heading "Ugly Hedgehog- Photography Forum" is a group of words third from the left is the word "search." type in "wolf spider?" and the forum will come up... You can see it there... Not the greatest picture but I'm still learning.
quote=SENSORLOUPE quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSO... (show quote)


I did find the spider!! good shot -- gives me the chills!

Reply
May 3, 2012 08:54:45   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


Hi again SENSORLOUPE: Actually the Canon Macro 100mm is a good portrait lens. Here is a great website that covers all of Canon's lenses, by usage and quality. http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html Hope this helps.


Thank you--I am going to check it out

Reply
May 3, 2012 17:26:20   #
travlnman46 Loc: Yakima WA
 
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


Hi again SENSORLOUPE: Actually the Canon Macro 100mm is a good portrait lens. Here is a great website that covers all of Canon's lenses, by usage and quality. http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html Hope this helps.


Thank you--I am going to check it out
quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks every... (show quote)


Hello once again SENSORLOUPE: I found my lens on Craigs List. It was a local post, we met where I could check it out. He had bought refirbished from B&H the previous year, for somewhat more than that I think he told me it was something like $450 to $500.

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2012 17:39:59   #
travlnman46 Loc: Yakima WA
 
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


Hi again SENSORLOUPE: Actually the Canon Macro 100mm is a good portrait lens. Here is a great website that covers all of Canon's lenses, by usage and quality. http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html Hope this helps.


Thank you--I am going to check it out
quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks every... (show quote)


Hello once again SENSORLOUPE: I found my lens on Craigs List. It was a local post, we met where I could check it out. He had bought refirbished from B&H the previous year, for somewhat more than that I think he told me it was something like $450 to $500. Once you've read all about them on the lens website You can try Craigs List, ebay, as well as all the major on line camera stores like KEH, B&H Adorama etc for pricing.

Reply
May 3, 2012 21:48:59   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
travlnman46 wrote:
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
Thanks everyone!! the camera shop told me today the macro was not good for portraits, that you had to be too far away!
Of course they did not have one to sell me either!!
so I am still kicking it around!


Hi again SENSORLOUPE: Actually the Canon Macro 100mm is a good portrait lens. Here is a great website that covers all of Canon's lenses, by usage and quality. http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html Hope this helps.


Thank you--I am going to check it out
quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSORLOUPE Thanks every... (show quote)


Hello once again SENSORLOUPE: I found my lens on Craigs List. It was a local post, we met where I could check it out. He had bought refirbished from B&H the previous year, for somewhat more than that I think he told me it was something like $450 to $500. Once you've read all about them on the lens website You can try Craigs List, ebay, as well as all the major on line camera stores like KEH, B&H Adorama etc for pricing.
quote=SENSORLOUPE quote=travlnman46 quote=SENSO... (show quote)


thanks again! I am going to check B&H for used. I always buy new from them. Also going to check local camera stores for used

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.