Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Focus issues….
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 10, 2016 23:43:22   #
sumo Loc: Houston suburb
 
On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4000 photos…. about 70% of those are slightly out of focus.
Im using a Nikon D600 with a 50-500mm Sigma lens, set on a center single focus point..

I deleted these pictures of the sand on one of the beaches there… then retrieved them for this question

If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus….
do you think this is my problem with slightly out of focus photos?


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Mar 10, 2016 23:46:58   #
CLP1943 Loc: Wisconsin
 
Most likely your aperture was quite large giving you a narrow depth of field.

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 00:09:17   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
sumo wrote:
...If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus…....


looks as though the camera is focusing just a bit further out than desired.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2016 00:12:51   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
I like the images. You have a shallow depth of field, but it is a nice effect. If you want more sand in sharper focus you need to use a narrower aperture, or get the camera sensor parallel to the beach (point it straight down.)

You could spend an hour practicing on a wall, for example, using different apertures and pointing the camera at different angles to the wall and the check the results and you will get an idea of what is going on with depth of field.

Mike

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 00:14:48   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
oldtigger wrote:
looks as though the camera is focusing just a bit further out than desired.


I guess autofocus could be off. I never use it and so always forget that it could possibly be the problem.

Mike

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 00:15:15   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
sumo wrote:
On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4000 photos…. about 70% of those are slightly out of focus.
Im using a Nikon D600 with a 50-500mm Sigma lens, set on a center single focus point..

I deleted these pictures of the sand on one of the beaches there… then retrieved them for this question

If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus….
do you think this is my problem with slightly out of focus photos?
On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4... (show quote)


What focal length were these taken at? Is this a new problem?

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 00:42:54   #
sumo Loc: Houston suburb
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
What focal length were these taken at? Is this a new problem?


taken at 420mm f13 , using BB focus

not new the focus problem always seems to be an issue for me.....never quite good enough when I compare my picts with others...

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2016 02:50:08   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
sumo wrote:
taken at 420mm f13 , using BB focus ...
not new the focus problem always seems to be an issue for me.....never quite good enough when I compare my picts with others...

who tuned the sigma lens to your camera for you?

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 04:35:29   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
sumo wrote:
.../... If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus…. .../...

"IF"????

The center are in focus, the dof is narrow so due the distribution (more in front than in the back) the front automatically becomes blurred faster.

There is no problem with your lens, just with your* choice of aperture.

-----
* Or the camera's

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 05:05:20   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
Rongnongno wrote:
"IF"????

The center are in focus, the dof is narrow so due the distribution (more in front than in the back) the front automatically becomes blurred faster.

There is no problem with your lens, just with your* choice of aperture.

-----
* Or the camera's


Agree…kinda
EXIF shows
Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Shot at 420 mm
Exposure: Manual exposure, 1/2,000 sec, f/13, ISO 720
Flash: Off, Did not fire
Focus: AF-C, at 2.5m, with a depth of field of about 2.3cm, centered on the focus point
AF Area Mode: Single Area

It's the aperture selected but it's also how the lens/camera is set to auto focus: The focus info is the key here: You were "spot focused" with a narrow DOF; the lens focused in the "single area" of the image area. Select a different AF for number of focus points.

So, it was the combination of the focal length, the aperture AND the AF option selected.

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 05:26:14   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
Expensive cameras don't take good pictures if you don't know how too use it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2016 05:49:30   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
sumo wrote:
On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4000 photos…. about 70% of those are slightly out of focus.
Im using a Nikon D600 with a 50-500mm Sigma lens, set on a center single focus point..

I deleted these pictures of the sand on one of the beaches there… then retrieved them for this question

If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus….
do you think this is my problem with slightly out of focus photos?
On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4... (show quote)


A couple issues factors:

Tripod?

Lens tangent to subject and Sensor plane?

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 06:12:42   #
howlynn Loc: pueblo west, co
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Agree…kinda
EXIF shows
Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Shot at 420 mm
Exposure: Manual exposure, 1/2,000 sec, f/13, ISO 720
Flash: Off, Did not fire
Focus: AF-C, at 2.5m, with a depth of field of about 2.3cm, centered on the focus point
AF Area Mode: Single Area

It's the aperture selected but it's also how the lens/camera is set to auto focus: The focus info is the key here: You were "spot focused" with a narrow DOF; the lens focused in the "single area" of the image area. Select a different AF for number of focus points.

So, it was the combination of the focal length, the aperture AND the AF option selected.
Agree…kinda br EXIF shows br Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6... (show quote)


With the focal distance being 2.5m (approx 98") this appears to be very close to the minimal focal distance of this lens. Could this cause the bottom portion of this photo to out-of-focus ?.

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 06:17:04   #
CO
 
LenTip.com does excellent lens reviews and tests lenses in twelve different categories. I downloaded the image resolution chart for the Sigma 50-500mm. You can see that the image resolution drops with longer focal lengths. Also f/8 seems to be the sharpest aperture for this lens.

I see that the camera was in AF-C mode. I would put it in AF-S mode for those shots.

Image resolution Sigma 50-500mm
Image resolution Sigma 50-500mm...

Reply
Mar 11, 2016 07:05:25   #
johneccles Loc: Leyland UK
 
[quote=sumo]On our recent trip to Costa Rica and I took over 4000 photos…. about 70% of those are slightly out of focus.
Im using a Nikon D600 with a 50-500mm Sigma lens, set on a center single focus point..

I deleted these pictures of the sand on one of the beaches there… then retrieved them for this question

If I had set a center single focus point…..shouldn't the center of this picture be in clearly in focus? to me it looks like the bottom half of the picture out of focus….
do you think this is my problem with slightly out of focus photos?[/quote

Lens: Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Shot at 420 mm
Exposure: Manual exposure, 1/2,000 sec, f/13, ISO 720
Flash: Off, Did not fire
Focus: AF-C, at 2.7m, with a depth of field of about 2.6cm, centered on the focus point
AF Area Mode: Single Area

Several setting have contributed to your focus problem:

It was shot at 420 mm so your depth of field was only 2.6mm
I would use a much smaller focal length say 50mm with an aperture of f/8 and an ISO of 100.
This would increase your depth of field so all of the frame would be in focus, and as there was no moving subjects you could shoot at a much lower shutter speed.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.