Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
For Your Consideration
tooth of the tiger
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 4, 2016 23:01:12   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
continuation of a theme -

was hoping for larger than life, fading away into the distance. Coming at us out of the darkness/past. I fear I would have been been better served to keep it all sharp.

For your consideration


(Download)

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 01:20:51   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
It works very well for me, just as it is, especiallyt when viewed larger.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 06:26:49   #
Frank2013 Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
 
pfrancke wrote:
continuation of a theme -

was hoping for larger than life, fading away into the distance. Coming at us out of the darkness/past. I fear I would have been been better served to keep it all sharp.

For your consideration
I will agree Piet. I love the lighting and detail though.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2016 07:35:57   #
Cwilson341 Loc: Central Florida
 
I too like this as it is. The slight fade out adds dimension and gives a feeling of distance. I think you are conveying you vision for this shot.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 07:59:05   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
I also think I "get" what you were after, Piet. Looks terrific! Carol's mention of added dimension makes sense to me, as does yours about coming out of the dark.

For me, a fully sharp image would be more documentary than mood- or message-related.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 09:00:07   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
If there was a bit more light on the bottom left corner it would give it more of a "comin' at ya" look.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 10:10:37   #
Uuglypher Loc: South Dakota (East River)
 
pfrancke wrote:
continuation of a theme -

was hoping for larger than life, fading away into the distance. Coming at us out of the darkness/past. I fear I would have been been better served to keep it all sharp.

For your consideration


Now THAT's undeniably and malevolently ominous!

Sleep tight, kiddies!

Dave

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2016 11:36:25   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
RichardTaylor wrote:
It works very well for me, just as it is, especiallyt when viewed larger.


thank you Richard

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 11:37:47   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
Frank2013 wrote:
I will agree Piet. I love the lighting and detail though.


thank you Frank - I like the first one also, perhaps because of the form or color, I can't pin down why.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 11:43:10   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
Cwilson341 wrote:
I too like this as it is. The slight fade out adds dimension and gives a feeling of distance. I think you are conveying you vision for this shot.


thank you Carol

Linda From Maine wrote:
I also think I "get" what you were after, Piet. Looks terrific! Carol's mention of added dimension makes sense to me, as does yours about coming out of the dark.

For me, a fully sharp image would be more documentary than mood- or message-related.


Thank you Linda

This is what I attempted. But when "faking" blur and sharpness, it is SO hard to get it smooth and right. With my small DOF, it is either sharp or badly blurred, so I tried taking some of the middle area to try to transition between them.

I fully agree about the mood vs documentary aspect. My goal 100 percent is to get macro shots to have mood and tension.

Perhaps the biggest thing I like about macro is that I can put a couple of hours into it in the evening when it suits. In most other forms of photography, your schedule is dictated to you. With macro I can try to learn and improve at my own convenience.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 11:44:37   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
Uuglypher wrote:
Now THAT's undeniably and malevolently ominous!

Sleep tight, kiddies!

Dave


LOL - thank you Dave. I did not "clearly" state that as my goal, but it undeniably is always a driving factor for me!!!

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2016 11:47:53   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
R.G. wrote:
If there was a bit more light on the bottom left corner it would give it more of a "comin' at ya" look.


Thank you R.G. Your advise helps me understand more about how things work to the eye. What you said would never have been spotted by me. I attempted to do this and you can see the results. I probably should have gotten the Bottom part of the bottom left brighter, but was fearful that there just was too much noise in that area. But I did try to do what you said to attempt to "swing" it back into our direction.

Again, a big thank you for helping me see.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 11:52:45   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
pfrancke wrote:
Thank you R.G. Your advise helps me understand more about how things work to the eye. What you said would never have been spotted by me. I attempted to do this and you can see the results. I probably should have gotten the Bottom part of the bottom left brighter, but was fearful that there just was too much noise in that area. But I did try to do what you said to attempt to "swing" it back into our direction.

Again, a big thank you for helping me see.


Subtle and effective :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 12:05:56   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
I've just picked up on your original query about leaving it sharp. I'd say what you've done works fine, but perhaps just ease off on the softening a touch. The softness doesn't have to intrude quite so far into the image to have its effect.

I would say don't worry too much about noise coming out from the lightened bits. The rest of the tooth has a fairly rough texture, so a bit of noise isn't going to jump out at us.

What I've found with lightening dark stuff is that the saturation sometimes needs a bit of a nudge after lightening, and if the dark area was dark because of shadowing, it might benefit from a slight WB shift from blue to yellow - although in this case the ambient light looks more amber than yellow (there's always the option of adding a tint if the WB shift doesn't work).

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 12:17:54   #
pfrancke Loc: cold Maine
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Subtle and effective :thumbup:


thank you Linda.

R.G. wrote:
I've just picked up on your original query about leaving it sharp. I'd say what you've done works fine, but perhaps just ease off on the softening a touch. The softness doesn't have to intrude quite so far into the image to have its effect.

I would say don't worry too much about noise coming out from the lightened bits. The rest of the tooth has a fairly rough texture, so a bit of noise isn't going to jump out at us.

What I've found with lightening dark stuff is that the saturation sometimes needs a bit of a nudge after lightening, and if the dark area was dark because of shadowing, it might benefit from a slight WB shift from blue to yellow - although in this case the ambient light looks more amber than yellow (there's always the option of adding a tint if the WB shift doesn't work).
I've just picked up on your original query about l... (show quote)


Thank you R.G.

R.G. Again, you have given me much to ponder. I am going to do a "do over" with your advise in mind. I am not always so good with using color shifting to my advantage. It happens, but mostly by accident than by design. Anyway, here is the image I have that I will begin from (except that mine is 16 bit). Much work for me to do, but I want to see if I can pull off a little bit about what you are saying.

Thank you for the homework assignment!!!!


(Download)

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.