Dwayne50021 wrote:
Info about Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Di Macro Lens
11.4" (0.29 m) Minimum Focus Distance
1:1 (Life -Size Magnification Ratio)
Weighs 14.3 oz (405 g)
Decent stats. This is a true macro lens. Most of the rest of your post was copy-&-paste of Tamron hype.
One addition to stats: 11.4-inches MFD is from film plane to subject. At MFD, your 90-mm should have a Working Distance (lens front element to subject) of about 135-mm (5.3-inches). WD is more important than MFD.
"Canon 50mm f2.5 Macro is usually lens than $250 new and much less used. On the Rebel it is the equivalent of an 80mm focal length.[/quote]
Ok. How do the pictures with this lens compare to the 18-55 kit lens that I got with my xt3i.
Thanks in advance
Screamin Scott wrote:
You would be hard pressed to find a true macro lens that doesn't deliver good images, no matter who makes it.
This is correct. The only codicil is that some manufacturers, as a selling ploy, scribe the word "Macro" on lenses that can only focus to 1:2 (1/2 life-size) or 1:3 (1/3 life-size). These are not true macros.
[quote=Nikonian72]
Dwayne50021 wrote:
Info about Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Di Macro Lens
11.4" (0.29 m) Minimum Focus Distance
1:1 (Life -Size Magnification Ratio)
Weighs 14.3 oz (405 g)
Decent stats. This is a true macro lens. Most of the rest of your post was copy-&-paste of Tamron hype.
Ok I will continue to learn about this lens and it capabilities just like I am about the camera. This is a different world to me but I am happy learning about photography. Fascinating topic with hands on learning. since it is digital you can delete at no cost. I like that feature..
The macro lens will give you much more magnification plus better edge to edge sharpness. If all you are doing is posting the images online on a photo sharing site, don't crop your photos much & don't pixel peep or print large enlargements, you would be hard pressed to see a lot difference in resolution.
amyinsparta wrote:
"Canon 50mm f2.5 Macro is usually lens than $250 new and much less used. On the Rebel it is the equivalent of an 80mm focal length.
Ok. How do the pictures with this lens compare to the 18-55 kit lens that I got with my xt3i.
Thanks in advance[/quote]
"since it is digital you can delete at no cost. I like that feature.."
Everything has a cost....The shutter on your camera has a limited lifespan. Taking excessive amounts of images leads to a shutter failing sooner so it's still a good practice to think about your shooting parameters prior to pressing that shutter button.
Screamin Scott wrote:
Everything has a cost....The shutter on your camera has a limited lifespan. Taking excessive amounts of images leads to a shutter failing sooner so it's still a good practice to think about your shooting parameters prior to pressing that shutter button.
Has any photographer on UHH had to replace a shutter due to excessive use? Most "consumer" and "pro-sumer" camera shutters are rated between 50,000 to 100,000 actuations. Averaging 835 exposures/month, 50,000 actuations = 5-years. Most photographers will upgrade within that time period.
Screamin Scott wrote:
"since it is digital you can delete at no cost. I like that feature.."
Everything has a cost....The shutter on your camera has a limited lifespan. Taking excessive amounts of images leads to a shutter failing sooner so it's still a good practice to think about your shooting parameters prior to pressing that shutter button.
I went to your flicker site to view your pics ...awesome pics.. What a spider! Great shots on many different subjects.
Thanks for the advice.
Screamin Scott wrote:
"since it is digital you can delete at no cost. I like that feature.."
Everything has a cost....The shutter on your camera has a limited lifespan. Taking excessive amounts of images leads to a shutter failing sooner so it's still a good practice to think about your shooting parameters prior to pressing that shutter button.
I went to your flicker site to view your pics ...awesome pics.. What a spider! Great shots on many different subjects.
Thanks for the advice.
A couple of photographers in my local camera club did a shoot today for the Atlanta "March of Dimes" walk. One shot over 700 images, the other shot 1400....That's ridiculous...Way over what your estimate ran & the reason I said there is a cost for everything. I don't shoot anywhere near those #'s & most people don't, but having learned on film, I still am judicious on the # of shots I take & plan my shots accordingly.....BTW, the Wolf spider on my Flickr stream was shot with a 1985 model "Lester A Dine" 105mm F2.8 macro lens @ 1:1 on a Nikon D70s (which doesn't meter with this MF lens, thus no lens info on the exif data)....I have picked up a used D300 as an upgrade to the D70s & got a bargain on one with 3098 shutter actuations (camera's shutter is rated to 150K) for $726...
BTW, I captured an even larger Wolf spider the other day at my day job & am keeping it to snap off some more shots, hopefully with a meal for it.
Nikonian72 wrote:
Screamin Scott wrote:
Everything has a cost....The shutter on your camera has a limited lifespan. Taking excessive amounts of images leads to a shutter failing sooner so it's still a good practice to think about your shooting parameters prior to pressing that shutter button.
Has any photographer on UHH had to replace a shutter due to excessive use? Most "consumer" and "pro-sumer" camera shutters are rated between 50,000 to 100,000 actuations. Averaging 835 exposures/month, 50,000 actuations = 5-years. Most photographers will upgrade within that time period.
quote=Screamin Scott Everything has a cost....The... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.