Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Members Buy/Sell/Trade -- Classifieds
1930/40'S KODAK CAMERA
Feb 26, 2016 15:43:57   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
1930/40'S KODAK CAMERA. THE "JIFFY" SIX-20 SERIES II. HAS ORGINAL BOX IN GOOD USED CONDITION. THERE IS NO MANUAL OR CASE WITH THIS SALE. NO TEARS OR HOLES IN THE BELLOWS. $39.95

Free shipping to lower 48.

get for collectors of vintage cameras
get for collectors of vintage cameras...

original box
original box...

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 16:26:17   #
tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio
 
How many megapixels are we talking here?
Nice shot by the way!

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 16:47:50   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
A film camera. Megas I do not know

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2016 05:35:06   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
avemal wrote:
1930/40'S KODAK CAMERA. THE "JIFFY" SIX-20 SERIES II. HAS ORGINAL BOX IN GOOD USED CONDITION. THERE IS NO MANUAL OR CASE WITH THIS SALE. NO TEARS OR HOLES IN THE BELLOWS. $39.95

Free shipping to lower 48.

avemal, I have my dad's old Kodak Monitor which looks very similar to what I see shown in your posting. It took really beautiful photos.
This Kodak Monitor used Kodak 620 film which is basically a 2-1/4" x 2-3/4 or 3" format negative. Somewhere in this dump that I live in I have all of my Dad's 620 negatives and if I could find the old galvanized metal negative box, I would check the dimensions of a 620 negative. I used this camera back in the late 1950s and I used Kodak's Tri-X film (ASA 400) for the most part. Back then I did all my own film developing and printing. The good ole days.
-FiddleMaker

Reply
Feb 27, 2016 08:48:16   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
Thanks for the info.

Reply
Feb 27, 2016 09:22:11   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
...Kodak 620 film which is basically a 2-1/4" x 2-3/4 or 3" format negative...Back then I did all my own film developing and printing. The good ole days.
-FiddleMaker


620 was the width, 2.25". The camera determined the length which went from less than 2.25" to more than that. I do not remember the different sizes. They were all great formats for enlarging.

You are right, they were the good old days. That is how to learn photography. Taking that film out of the hypo and seeing your pictures was magical. Watching the print come up in the developer was even more magical. Digital photography does not excite in this way but ultimately gives a better result. With film, you had to compose, time and expose the shot just right. You learned the art and science. Now, with digital, shoot a burst and pick the best. Then, develop that shot to perfection. The results are better, just not the magic.

Reply
Feb 27, 2016 09:22:11   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
...Kodak 620 film which is basically a 2-1/4" x 2-3/4 or 3" format negative...Back then I did all my own film developing and printing. The good ole days.
-FiddleMaker


620 was the width, 2.25". The camera determined the length which went from less than 2.25" to more than that. I do not remember the different sizes. They were all great formats for enlarging.

You are right, they were the good old days. That is how to learn photography. Taking that film out of the hypo and seeing your pictures was magical. Watching the print come up in the developer was even more magical. Digital photography does not excite in this way but ultimately gives a better result. With film, you had to compose, time and expose the shot just right. You learned the art and science. Now, with digital, shoot a burst and pick the best. Then, develop that shot to perfection. The results are better, just not the magic.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2016 10:12:48   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
abc1234 wrote:
620 was the width, 2.25". The camera determined the length which went from less than 2.25" to more than that. I do not remember the different sizes. They were all great formats for enlarging.

You are right, they were the good old days. That is how to learn photography. Taking that film out of the hypo and seeing your pictures was magical. Watching the print come up in the developer was even more magical. Digital photography does not excite in this way but ultimately gives a better result. With film, you had to compose, time and expose the shot just right. You learned the art and science. Now, with digital, shoot a burst and pick the best. Then, develop that shot to perfection. The results are better, just not the magic.
620 was the width, 2.25". The camera determi... (show quote)

My darkroom was a tad small so all the odors of the D-76, short stop, and hypo really got my attention at times. But the smell of those magical chemicals were certainly not offensive - they were part of the whole process. I found it easier to thread (in total darkness) the undressed roll of 620 film onto the stainless steel developing reel than to thread a strip of 35mm film. Both were challenging but I found the 620 film easier to work with. 4x5 sheet film from my Sinar-f was a different matter. -FiddleMaker

Reply
Feb 27, 2016 10:37:44   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
My darkroom was a tad small so all the odors of the D-76, short stop, and hypo really got my attention at times. But the smell of those magical chemicals were certainly not offensive - they were part of the whole process. I found it easier to thread (in total darkness) the undressed roll of 620 film onto the stainless steel developing reel than to thread a strip of 35mm film. Both were challenging but I found the 620 film easier to work with. 4x5 sheet film from my Sinar-f was a different matter. -FiddleMaker
My darkroom was a tad small so all the odors of th... (show quote)


Agreed on the odors and how the sulfurous acid lingered on the skin. And 120 was easier than 35 mm.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 05:29:33   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
SOLD

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Members Buy/Sell/Trade -- Classifieds
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.