Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
best lens
Apr 27, 2012 02:42:52   #
big d Loc: Rossendale Lancashire
 
Does anybody had experience with sigma lenses? which is best for wedding photography 24-80 f 2.8 or 17-70 .8 or 17-70 2.8-4 Cheers Dave

Reply
Apr 27, 2012 09:04:21   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
Dave, if those are my only choices I'd go with 24-80 2.8 but personally, I'd prefer a longer lens.

Reply
Apr 27, 2012 13:01:55   #
big d Loc: Rossendale Lancashire
 
cheers Frank T

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2012 13:09:54   #
dame_wolf Loc: Oregon
 
I don't have any Sigma lenses but I do love my Tamron 28-75mm 2.8.

Reply
Apr 27, 2012 13:11:55   #
ward5311 Loc: Georgia
 
MT is their head of sales for the U.S. Send PM to MT Shooter.

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 08:13:10   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
big d wrote:
Does anybody had experience with sigma lenses? which is best for wedding photography 24-80 f 2.8 or 17-70 .8 or 17-70 2.8-4 Cheers Dave

Read online reviews - kenrockwell.com, dpreview.com, http://photozone.de/ Manufacturers make some lenses that are really good and some that are pretty good.

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 08:13:46   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
ward5311 wrote:
MT is their head of sales for the U.S. Send PM to MT Shooter.

I thought he was Head of Propaganda.

Reply
 
 
Apr 28, 2012 08:24:48   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
I also have the Tamron 28-75 -- 2.8 --use on Canon 30D and 50D --Great lens!

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 08:52:22   #
kadonjomo
 
I have shot a few weddings using Sigma lenses. I use a Sigma 17-50 F2.8 and a Sigma 70-200 F2.8 with outstanding results. My only regret is that I bought the 70-200 before they added image stabilization on them. To tell you the truth the 70-200 is my workhorse but the 17-50 is also irreplaceable. My only complaint is that the 70-200 is a brick! Very heavy.

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 09:45:55   #
Mr Clickie Loc: Twin Cities, MN
 
Prior to my first wedding shoot I purchased the 17-70 2.8-4.0,OS. Love the versatility and its my main walkaround lens. My other Sigma's include the 10-20 superwide and recently bought a used (E+)70-200 2.8(non os)from Adorama and love that one too. Just can't afford Nikon glass all the time but do have a few of their 1.8's (35&50). I've heard some of the old Sigma's had some compatability issues with Nikon but I believe that's been resolved. Can't say I lust for anything else right now except maybe a 1.4tc. I'm a happy Sigma camper. Fyi, I shoot w/D200's.

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 11:24:04   #
CAM1017 Loc: Chiloquin, Oregon
 
big d wrote:
Does anybody had experience with sigma lenses? which is best for wedding photography 24-80 f 2.8 or 17-70 .8 or 17-70 2.8-4 Cheers Dave


Sounds like a loaded question that should bring some interesting reply's.

Reply
 
 
Apr 28, 2012 13:57:12   #
02Nomad Loc: Catonsville, MD
 
I use the Sigma 17 - 70 as the main lens on my backup camera; it won't work on my full frame. It's a great lens!

Reply
Apr 28, 2012 21:11:58   #
avery48 Loc: Jefferson City
 
I've had the 17-70 f2.8 for a bit over a year. It's my "go-to" lens...I keep it on my camera 95 % of the time. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but it's fast and I like it.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.