Nightski wrote:
Voss, you can get closer and still include environment if you are using a wide angle lens. The thing that I noticed was that you were using a 55 mm. I have seen you make a comment before that you are usually at a longer focal length. I think the best Street shots happen when you are engaging your subject. A wide angle lens helps you include your environment and engage your subject.
The above is not consistent with physics. Perspective changes with distance, not with the focal length of the lens. Changing the focal length merely sets the framing of the chosen perspective. When the camera is moved closer to any object, that object becomes larger in perspective. If object A is twice as close as object B, object A is much larger than B. If the difference in distance is only slight, the difference in size is only slight. Standing back, with a longer lens gets the same context, with a very different perspective.
If the point is to show the character of an individual, which is a portrait of that individual, then closer might be better.
Street is generally, though not always, not about "engaging" with a subject. Life is the subject, and can't be engaged as such anyway, and if the subject engaged is a person it becomes a portrait rather than Street and loses any pretense to being candid.
Here's a very significant and profound comment on exactly that, from Ming Thein of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The full essay is at
http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/07/14/the-evolution-of-street-photography/And includes a number of images from "The Idea of Man" project. It might also be helpful to view the About page (accessed from the main web page) to see the credentials of Ming Thein.
From the essay titled "The Evolution of Street Photography".
Getting closer is not a solution: the amount of context
diminishes. Going wider is not a counterbalancing option,
either: the relative prominence of foreground subject and
background context is disrupted and may not be in the initially
desired balance. ...
The upshot is that I need to consider images with a much greater
scale or sweep; the more macro-context, the better. This must
come with a longer focal length so that the contextual elements
remain in balance with the subject. As a result, the focus of
the image is less about the individual and more about what that
individual could represent; a sort of Everyman. Facial
expressions are far less critical because they're less obvious;
body language still matters, but this eases up on the
criticality of timing. It is a photograph to encapsulate an era
rather than a single instant.