Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
For Your Consideration
Orbiting Neptune, Window View
Feb 20, 2016 12:09:16   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
No, I have not been on a space mission to the outer planets.

To create this image, I used a video camera eyepiece I recently found discarded on the street, and pressed it up to my camera's lens. Also, I used a small LED flashlight for lighting and a coiled up guitar string as prop. As a final touch, I added the background stars in editing, painting them in individually at variable sizes, and then softening them with the blur tool for a more realistic glow.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 20, 2016 12:18:51   #
Frank2013 Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
 
Quite creative and well done 2c4.

Reply
Feb 20, 2016 13:02:40   #
Uuglypher Loc: South Dakota (East River)
 
rook2c4 wrote:
No, I have not been on a space mission to the outer planets.

To create this image, I used a video camera eyepiece I recently found discarded on the street, and pressed it up to my camera's lens. Also, I used a small LED flashlight for lighting and a coiled up guitar string as prop. As a final touch, I added the background stars in editing, painting them in individually at variable sizes, and then softening them with the blur tool for a more realistic glow.


A fascinating concept with imaginative accomplishment!
I suggest that the spacecraft window, the slight arc of Neptune in its lower quarter, and the suggestions of stars are perfect.
The mystical smoothly flowing (almost ) random coils are effective...except that the windings of wire on the string, and the two kinks in the coils emphasize the incongruity of proportion between the massive scale of Neptune's arc, the stars, and the segment of observed cosmos....and what is resolved as the tiny scale of the details of the coiled guitar string. I think that a smooth-surfaced coil would work far better because it's distance would be more ambiguous (at least to any players of stringed instruments who may view the image....)

I really do think your concept is wonderfully fascinating and very much hope you will pursue its development further.

Dave

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2016 15:26:31   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Very interesting and creative!

Reply
Feb 20, 2016 16:43:26   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Frank2013 wrote:
Quite creative and well done 2c4.


Thank you, Frank2013!

Reply
Feb 20, 2016 17:01:03   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Uuglypher wrote:
A fascinating concept with imaginative accomplishment!
I suggest that the spacecraft window, the slight arc of Neptune in its lower quarter, and the suggestions of stars are perfect.
The mystical smoothly flowing (almost ) random coils are effective...except that the windings of wire on the string, and the two kinks in the coils emphasize the incongruity of proportion between the massive scale of Neptune's arc, the stars, and the segment of observed cosmos....and what is resolved as the tiny scale of the details of the coiled guitar string. I think that a smooth-surfaced coil would work far better because it's distance would be more ambiguous (at least to any players of stringed instruments who may view the image....)

I really do think your concept is wonderfully fascinating and very much hope you will pursue its development further.

Dave
A fascinating concept with imaginative accomplish... (show quote)


Dave, thank you for your analysis. The guitar string is supposed to represent external cables of the spacecraft just out side of the window, although I'm not sure if it visually translates well as such. A difficult project to pull off convincingly, for sure.

Reply
Feb 20, 2016 17:21:44   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Very interesting and creative!


I'm glad you liked it! The reason I posted this image in the FYC section was to encourage others to explore the creative possibilities with simple everyday objects, and that these objects can sometimes take on a new identity or meaning when presented out of context.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2016 14:24:03   #
jim hill Loc: Springfield, IL
 
rook2c4 wrote:
No, I have not been on a space mission to the outer planets.

To create this image, I used a video camera eyepiece I recently found discarded on the street, and pressed it up to my camera's lens. Also, I used a small LED flashlight for lighting and a coiled up guitar string as prop. As a final touch, I added the background stars in editing, painting them in individually at variable sizes, and then softening them with the blur tool for a more realistic glow.


Hi Rook,

The very first thing I look at when viewing any work of art is the form. This is a fascinating example of "form follows function". The function in this case being the construction of a piece that attracts the mind of kindred artists no matter what the medium. Once I gazed upon this I needed no further analysis. The form itself opened up a realm of possibilities into which I could cast about - my mind ablaze with different scenarios.

Because my sight isn't what it used to be I missed the stars. Maybe that's a good thing for a truly love the dynamic space and little white dots might have been a distraction - only maybe.

Truly an amazing construct!

Reply
Feb 21, 2016 14:25:20   #
jim hill Loc: Springfield, IL
 
.

Reply
Feb 21, 2016 19:09:51   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
jim hill wrote:
Hi Rook,

The very first thing I look at when viewing any work of art is the form. This is a fascinating example of "form follows function". The function in this case being the construction of a piece that attracts the mind of kindred artists no matter what the medium. Once I gazed upon this I needed no further analysis. The form itself opened up a realm of possibilities into which I could cast about - my mind ablaze with different scenarios.

Because my sight isn't what it used to be I missed the stars. Maybe that's a good thing for a truly love the dynamic space and little white dots might have been a distraction - only maybe.

Truly an amazing construct!
Hi Rook, br br The very first thing I look at whe... (show quote)


Thank you for the compliment, Jim.

While constructing the image, the first thing I asked myself: Stripped of all description and context, does the image still have visual appeal? Will it be effective as a purely "semi-abstract" artwork? This is where form and composition obviously become the deciding factors. How each individual viewer then interprets the image or discovers meaning in the image is not important.

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 01:49:23   #
Billyspad Loc: The Philippines
 
In a forum that is in danger at times of becoming hackneyed humdrum and lacking in creativity along comes a wonderfully conceived and thought out piece such as this. Dare to be different more often please.
at risk of upsetting you I do not see this as art or abstract but a very well thought out and executed model which makes it no less valid in my eyes.
Sit back and wait for for Pixar or one of the other animation houses to call you.
Whatever its called great work.

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2016 09:17:14   #
jim hill Loc: Springfield, IL
 
rook2c4 wrote:
Thank you for the compliment, Jim.

While constructing the image, the first thing I asked myself: Stripped of all description and context, does the image still have visual appeal? Will it be effective as a purely "semi-abstract" artwork? This is where form and composition obviously become the deciding factors. How each individual viewer then interprets the image or discovers meaning in the image is not important.


I think you left off a couple qualifiers at the end of your final sentence. Maybe you meant to add, "to me."

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 10:38:32   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
jim hill wrote:
I think you left off a couple qualifiers at the end of your final sentence. Maybe you meant to add, "to me."


I meant in respect to the intrinsic value of the image. Adding "to me" to the sentence would suggest I don't care what viewers think or feel about the image, which certainly isn't true.

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 10:57:01   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Billyspad wrote:
In a forum that is in danger at times of becoming hackneyed humdrum and lacking in creativity along comes a wonderfully conceived and thought out piece such as this. Dare to be different more often please.
at risk of upsetting you I do not see this as art or abstract but a very well thought out and executed model which makes it no less valid in my eyes.
Sit back and wait for for Pixar or one of the other animation houses to call you.
Whatever its called great work.


What a very generous and encouraging compliment!

In photography, sometimes you have to push the boundaries a little, or else it becomes repetitive and tiresome. Although there are plenty of photographers who are quite satisfied photographing the the same bird feeder and its feathered visitors over and over again, year after year. But that's not for me.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.