Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
UV Filters, use them or not
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Feb 18, 2016 02:11:46   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
Believe it or not there is one point that has not been made here.

There is a large body of pschological data that shows most people engage in more risky behavior when provided additional safety barriers. It also shows all of them claim they do not. :-)

For this case it means that those who keep UV filters on their lenses are less likely to most effectvely use their lens caps or hoods as protection. All they succeed in doing is breaking some filters that should not have broken had they made effective use of the lens cap and hood.

Reply
Feb 18, 2016 03:11:39   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Never use one.
Heck, they don't even make them for my big lenses!!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Feb 18, 2016 07:55:23   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
tinwhistle wrote:
Well, this conversation has certainly been interesting. I keep a good quality UV filter on all my lenses more as a maintenance issue than for accident protection. If you have ever climbed up into a combine at harvest you will understand the need, especially soybean harvest. Walking across a large construction job site is hazardous to both equipment and photographer. But this thread has brought up a couple good points concerning the quality of todays front glass elements. I believe I'll spend a few shoots without the filter and see if there is a noticeable improvement in image quality. I must say, though, that the "Blackbird" part of the thread is very interesting! No doubt it is a beautiful bird. I was, however , the crew chief on the most beautiful, most versatile, toughest aircraft in the history of air power. The C-130 Hercules. Baddest bird on the block...
Well, this conversation has certainly been interes... (show quote)


For an easy experiment, shoot the full moon with and without a filter. The filter less images should be better.

I agree the C-130 is the most versatile and in toughness it's right up there with the A-10, except I wouldn't want to be in an A-10 flying thru a hurricane. A C-130 gunship is truly awesome but I'd have to give baddest to the B-1B, but then that's a whole different kind of bird. C-130 also wins the longevity award. They started building them in what, the early 50's and they're still building them.

Did you read about the brand new C-130 that was grounded last year for having flown upside-down? The crew was practicing a sideslip maneuver and managed to flip the aircraft over. They managed to get it belly down again but the Lockheed folks said the frame of the aircraft was compromised by the forces inflicted on it by flying upside-down. It's now 115 million in spare parts. Oops...

I remember one year at the Willow Grove air show a C-130 landed and a C-5 came in right behind it. They parked the two aircraft beside each other. It was like little brother and really big brother. The C-130 was the star performer at that show. They did aerial demonstrations of what a C-130 cargo plane could do and the awesomeness of a C-130 gunship.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2016 08:07:14   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
For an easy experiment, shoot the full moon with and without a filter. The filter less images should be better.

I agree the C-130 is the most versatile and in toughness it's right up there with the A-10, except I wouldn't want to be in an A-10 flying thru a hurricane. A C-130 gunship is truly awesome but I'd have to give baddest to the B-1B, but then that's a whole different kind of bird. C-130 also wins the longevity award. They started building them in what, the early 50's and they're still building them.

Did you read about the brand new C-130 that was grounded last year for having flown upside-down? The crew was practicing a sideslip maneuver and managed to flip the aircraft over. They managed to get it belly down again but the Lockheed folks said the frame of the aircraft was compromised by the forces inflicted on it by flying upside-down. It's now 115 million in spare parts. Oops...

I remember one year at the Willow Grove air show a C-130 landed and a C-5 came in right behind it. They parked the two aircraft beside each other. It was like little brother and really big brother. The C-130 was the star performer at that show. They did aerial demonstrations of what a C-130 cargo plane could do and the awesomeness of a C-130 gunship.
For an easy experiment, shoot the full moon with a... (show quote)


As I mentioned, I use a UV about 95% of the time. Lunar photos, and those facing somewhat in the direction of the sun are part of the 5% that I don't.
--Bob

Reply
Feb 18, 2016 08:11:24   #
Jim Bob
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
I just read a posting about a dropped lens and immediately remembered the last, and hopefully last, time I dropped a lens.

It was a few years ago and it was an almost brand new Tamron SP 70-200 f/2.8 lens. I was removing the lens from its case and it somehow slipped out of my hands and landed face first at an angle on the pavement below.

I generally do not use UV filters when taking photos as they only add an extra layer of glass for the light to pass thru. But, when the lens is not in use I always put a UV filter on it for added protection.

The then $1500.00 lens hit the concrete with a nasty thud. I uttered a few four letter expletives then picked up my lens. The glass was cracked and the rim was bent at the point of contact.

I then removed the $10 UV filter that saved my lens, mounted the lens to the camera body and went about taking photos. On the way home I stopped at the local camera shop to pick up a replacement filter. The sales person tried to sell me some special quadruple coated specifically designed for digital cameras super deluxe UV filter for like $80 or some outrageous price. I said, just give me the cheapest one you've got, its only purpose is a companion for the lens cap.
I just read a posting about a dropped lens and imm... (show quote)


Use them or no. What have you really learned from this useless thread? Some say yes, others no.

Reply
Feb 18, 2016 10:03:34   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
tinwhistle wrote:
Well, this conversation has certainly been interesting. I keep a good quality UV filter on all my lenses more as a maintenance issue than for accident protection. If you have ever climbed up into a combine at harvest you will understand the need, especially soybean harvest. Walking across a large construction job site is hazardous to both equipment and photographer. But this thread has brought up a couple good points concerning the quality of todays front glass elements. I believe I'll spend a few shoots without the filter and see if there is a noticeable improvement in image quality. I must say, though, that the "Blackbird" part of the thread is very interesting! No doubt it is a beautiful bird. I was, however , the crew chief on the most beautiful, most versatile, toughest aircraft in the history of air power. The C-130 Hercules. Baddest bird on the block...
Well, this conversation has certainly been interes... (show quote)


^^^The highlighted sentence above is PERFECT for this thread, as it both describes the best attribute of a UV filter as well as its proper usage. :thumbup:

BTW, if you ever make it to FLA, be sure to check out the Air Force Armament Museum. It has on display, "First Lady"... the first C-130 to be converted to Gun Ship use. It is a magnificent specimen. :thumbup:

http://www.jazz707.com/PhotoJournal/2014/USA-October-2014/i-xmbzFV2/0/XL/IMG_0884-XL.jpg

Reply
Feb 18, 2016 14:08:26   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Use them or no. What have you really learned from this useless thread? Some say yes, others no.


I have learned several things from this thread. I've learned that some people have no consideration for other people. I've learned that there are many intelligent people here who understand what a conversation is and that there are also curmudgeons and bullies wherever one goes. I've learned that some people here live in a black and white world and appear to be incapable of seeing the big picture. I've learned that people here have things in common other than photography. I've learned there are lots of good people here. I've learned that even though I don't consider myself better than anyone else, I am.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.