Nikon FX Body
Jan 24, 2016 11:58:11 #
Woodworm65
Loc: Lombard, IL
Not being familiar with FX Nikon cameras what FX body that is to be used strictly for wildlife and landscape , and it would not require a mortgage payment would you suggest, I already have a D7200.
Jan 24, 2016 12:00:04 #
Have a look at the Df or D750.
But I'd have to add....whats wrong with the D7200? (other than the Dx format)
But I'd have to add....whats wrong with the D7200? (other than the Dx format)
Jan 24, 2016 12:05:08 #
The D750 works for me. It's not the ultimate for either but it works well for both.
Jan 24, 2016 12:14:38 #
I would not personally use a full frame camera for those two genres of photography.
Why?
Because of the apparent extended reach or longer equivalent reach of lenses on the DX sensor.
In fact I use Olympus M4/3 for that very 2x reach of lenses. The image quality is there, and you've not mentioned any need for the benefits of Full Frame so far in your question.
I realize I strayed from your inquiry about strictly "What Nikon FX body", but I don't have a problem with your desire to stay with Nikon.
I do have a problem with the need for Full Frame, or FX from any manufacturer strictly (your word) Wildlife and Landscapes.
Why?
Because of the apparent extended reach or longer equivalent reach of lenses on the DX sensor.
In fact I use Olympus M4/3 for that very 2x reach of lenses. The image quality is there, and you've not mentioned any need for the benefits of Full Frame so far in your question.
I realize I strayed from your inquiry about strictly "What Nikon FX body", but I don't have a problem with your desire to stay with Nikon.
I do have a problem with the need for Full Frame, or FX from any manufacturer strictly (your word) Wildlife and Landscapes.
Jan 24, 2016 12:15:59 #
Kuzano wrote:
I would not personally use a full frame camera for those two genres of photography.
Why?
Because of the apparent extended reach or longer equivalent reach of lenses on the DX sensor.
In fact I use Olympus M4/3 for that very 2x reach of lenses. The image quality is there, and you've not mentioned any need for the benefits of Full Frame so far in your question.
Why?
Because of the apparent extended reach or longer equivalent reach of lenses on the DX sensor.
In fact I use Olympus M4/3 for that very 2x reach of lenses. The image quality is there, and you've not mentioned any need for the benefits of Full Frame so far in your question.
You wouldn't use FF for landscape???
Jan 24, 2016 12:16:17 #
There is no one camera that is best for wildlife and landscape. Landscape calls for highest resolution and most wildlife benefits from high speed.
I have to agree with those who said D750. While the D810 has higher resolution, the D750 has a higher speed. I've seen more than a few large landscape prints from sensors with a lot less than 24 MP.
The D750 also meets your third criteria, it shouldn't break the bank.
--
I have to agree with those who said D750. While the D810 has higher resolution, the D750 has a higher speed. I've seen more than a few large landscape prints from sensors with a lot less than 24 MP.
The D750 also meets your third criteria, it shouldn't break the bank.
--
Jan 24, 2016 12:18:51 #
ptcanon3ti wrote:
You wouldn't use FF for landscape???
Only for one reason.... large prints... and I mean large.
And if I were going to print large, I wouldn't use digital. I would use 4X5 film....13 times film area to digital sensor area. But that was not part of the OP's question, so that's out of place here.
I'm just responding to you personally and telling you what I do for the best Image Quality in my personal estimation.
Otherwise, not on a bet!
Jan 24, 2016 12:19:43 #
Kuzano wrote:
Only for one reason.... large prints... and I mean large.
Otherwise, not on a bet!
Otherwise, not on a bet!
hmm..ok. your choice. :)
Jan 24, 2016 12:25:55 #
Woodworm65 wrote:
Not being familiar with FX Nikon cameras what FX body that is to be used strictly for wildlife and landscape , and it would not require a mortgage payment would you suggest, I already have a D7200.
I use a Df for both of what you mention.
Jan 24, 2016 12:27:35 #
jackpi
Loc: Southwest Ohio
Woodworm65 wrote:
Not being familiar with FX Nikon cameras what FX body that is to be used strictly for wildlife and landscape , and it would not require a mortgage payment would you suggest, I already have a D7200.
I think DX bodies are better for wildlife because of the crop factor. As far as landscape goes, you will be on a tripod, so why not do a panorama (multiple shots stitched in Lightroom). I have an FX body and a very wide lens, but I still do panoramas. You can buy a good tripod and pano head for much, much less than an FX body and all of the new lenses you will need to go with it.
You can make larger prints using a D7200 and panning two levels than with any FX camera that isn't panning.
Jan 24, 2016 12:28:07 #
Nikon d750 would be an awesome upgrade to the 7200. As a bonus button placement is more or less the same, reduces the learning curve.
Jan 24, 2016 12:33:32 #
Pano can be fun. But if I can get the shot I want without extra steps when shooting and processing, I'll stick a wide angle on a FF.
But, that is a choice we all make.
--
But, that is a choice we all make.
--
Jan 24, 2016 12:34:58 #
Woodworm65 wrote:
Not being familiar with FX Nikon cameras what FX body that is to be used strictly for wildlife and landscape , and it would not require a mortgage payment would you suggest, I already have a D7200.
You can wait 2 months and get a D500. High speed and DX for BIF. Expeed 5 for high resolution landscapes.
Jan 24, 2016 12:37:44 #
Woodworm65 wrote:
Not being familiar with FX Nikon cameras what FX body that is to be used strictly for wildlife and landscape , and it would not require a mortgage payment would you suggest, I already have a D7200.
the d750 will have very similar button layout as the d7200 and it is a great ff camera. that being said, what lenses do you currently have? if you have invested a lot in dx lenses, then you would have to reinvest in full frame lenses, as the dx lenses do not work well on a full frame camera, even though you may shoot in the dx mode on a full frame camera, you lose more than 1/2 of your pixels. if you already have a large investment in dx lenses, you will not gain that much by going to a full frame camera. if most of your present lenses are full frame lenses, then you will be pleased with the d750. check places like b&h photo and adorama for used or refurbished to get a better price.
Jan 24, 2016 12:43:25 #
OviedoPhotos wrote:
Nikon d750 would be an awesome upgrade to the 7200. As a bonus button placement is more or less the same, reduces the learning curve.
Agreed, but the OP should not overlook the D610 which also has a 24 mp FX sensor, similar controls to the 7200 and costs about $500 less than a D750. Feature wise he would not get the flip out screen or the more advanced autofocus of the 750. For landscape, I doubt there is any difference in function or IQ, for sports the 750 has a slight advantage being slightly faster, having a larger buffer and the improved AF. One has to decide if worth the price difference.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.