JimG1 wrote:
I just bought a Canon 2X teleconverter and plan to use it with my F2.8 70-200. I know I lose 2 F-stops with it. My question is, if I'm on a monopod, do I turn IS on or off?
On a monopod... I'd NEVER turn off IS. There will always be enough movement for IS to be needed when using a monopod. If using a teleconverter, any movement is even more exaggerated and IS is even more important.
In fact, assuming that's a
Canon 70-200... the IS
never needs to be turned off at all (unless you need to conserve a little battery power... though IS doesn't actually use much).
All the Canon 70-200 with IS will "self-detect" if the lens is locked down on a tripod and there's no movement, and will automatically turn off IS themselves. This is true of all but a few of the Canon IS lenses.
The list of lenses that can't self-detect and automatically turn off IS is pretty short. Among current and recent models, the Canon 28-135, 300/4, 24-105 and the original 100-400 are the only lenses that definitely require IS to be manually turned off, when the lens is solidly locked down on a tripod. In the complete absence of any movement, these particular lenses' IS can go into sort of a feedback loop where the IS actually creates movement and causes image blur.
Even with these lenses, if you forget to turn it off and the IS goes wacky, you'll see it happening in the viewfinder and can then turn off IS manually. No harm will be done, except possibly for a blurred image or two. The camera and lens themselves won't be damaged.
But with most Canon IS lens, there's no worries. My EF 70-200 IS lenses are among my most used... one of them I've been using for about 15 years hasn't had the IS turned off for any reason for as long as I can remember. In fact, I've got a piece of gaffer tape over the switches to prevent accidentally turning it off.
All this only pertains to Canon IS lenses. Image stabilization in other brand lenses (Sigma OS, Tamron VC, Nikon VR) may work differently and need to be treated differently.