Uuglypher wrote:
Hi, Pete,
Personal opinion?
Both could qualify as "street" but neither would elicit more than a cursory glance of cause a breac-in -step in my circulation through the gallery. the first is architectural, and though there are people in the second, they are off to the side, seem not to be niter acting, and all seem to be wasting to go elsewhere.Not he kind of potential story to hold attention.
One guy"s opinion.
Dave
They are kind of touristy, if that's a word.
Here's one of a tourist.