Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
Keystone No, Kenya Pipeline Yes
The U.S. says it wants to help finance an oil pipeline in Africa.
Jan. 10, 2016 5:57 p.m. ET
111 COMMENTS
T***sCanada took Uncle Sam to court last week to reclaim some of the damage done by the Obama Administrations multiyear, drawn-out rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline. It may not come up in the litigation, but someone should point out that the same Obama Administration that rejected Keystone seems to have no problem supporting a new oil pipeline project in Africa.
That was the story last week out of Kenya, where U.S. Ambassador Robert Godec told Kenyas energy minister that Washington would help Nairobi raise $18 billion to finance its PowerAfrika project. The pipeline would stretch from Kenyas Rift Valley to Lamu on the coast. Kenya needs $18 billion worth of financing, Mr. Godec said, according to a dispatch in Oilprice.com, so one of the questions we are discussing is how we can work together with the private sector and governments to raise that sum, to find ways to make certain that this financing becomes available.
Has Mr. Godec checked with Secretary of State John Kerry, or, perhaps more important, anti-oil Democratic financier Tom Steyer? Kenya and Northeast Africa could certainly use the investment and jobs that would come from the oil project. Then again, so could the United States. Whats with the double standard on pipelines?
Meanwhile, T***sCanada said it is bringing an international arbitration case against the U.S. for not treating the Canadian company the way it would an American company, as it is obliged to do under the North American Free Trade Agreement. The company said it would seek to recover some $15 billion in costs and damages, and dont be surprised if the case succeeds given the extraordinary regulatory barriers the U.S. imposed on the investment. Though multiple reviews showed no environmental harm, President Obama rejected the pipeline on arbitrary political grounds. T***sCanada also filed a suit in U.S. federal court claiming that Mr. Obamas decision to block Keystone exceeded his constitutional authority.
These cases are worth watching, especially by those who still want the U.S. to welcome foreign investment. Meanwhile, U.S. taxpayers will want to keep an eye out to see if their dollars are used to finance the Kenya project.
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Cykdelic wrote:
Keystone No, Kenya Pipeline Yes
The U.S. says it wants to help finance an oil pipeline in Africa.
Jan. 10, 2016 5:57 p.m. ET
111 COMMENTS
T***sCanada took Uncle Sam to court last week to reclaim some of the damage done by the Obama Administrations multiyear, drawn-out rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline. It may not come up in the litigation, but someone should point out that the same Obama Administration that rejected Keystone seems to have no problem supporting a new oil pipeline project in Africa.
That was the story last week out of Kenya, where U.S. Ambassador Robert Godec told Kenyas energy minister that Washington would help Nairobi raise $18 billion to finance its PowerAfrika project. The pipeline would stretch from Kenyas Rift Valley to Lamu on the coast. Kenya needs $18 billion worth of financing, Mr. Godec said, according to a dispatch in Oilprice.com, so one of the questions we are discussing is how we can work together with the private sector and governments to raise that sum, to find ways to make certain that this financing becomes available.
Has Mr. Godec checked with Secretary of State John Kerry, or, perhaps more important, anti-oil Democratic financier Tom Steyer? Kenya and Northeast Africa could certainly use the investment and jobs that would come from the oil project. Then again, so could the United States. Whats with the double standard on pipelines?
Meanwhile, T***sCanada said it is bringing an international arbitration case against the U.S. for not treating the Canadian company the way it would an American company, as it is obliged to do under the North American Free Trade Agreement. The company said it would seek to recover some $15 billion in costs and damages, and dont be surprised if the case succeeds given the extraordinary regulatory barriers the U.S. imposed on the investment. Though multiple reviews showed no environmental harm, President Obama rejected the pipeline on arbitrary political grounds. T***sCanada also filed a suit in U.S. federal court claiming that Mr. Obamas decision to block Keystone exceeded his constitutional authority.
These cases are worth watching, especially by those who still want the U.S. to welcome foreign investment. Meanwhile, U.S. taxpayers will want to keep an eye out to see if their dollars are used to finance the Kenya project.
Keystone No, Kenya Pipeline Yes br The U.S. says i... (
show quote)
I don't think the US can afford Obama.
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Its just that he is doing what his handlers say
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.