Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Old Kodak Ads
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 27, 2015 20:03:43   #
Pixelmaster Loc: New England
 
I have always liked the old Kodak ads. Here are two of them.





Reply
Dec 27, 2015 20:12:37   #
bmattock Loc: SE Michigan
 
I digitized some old issues of Kodakery a few years back.

https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=Kodakery&user_id=17273949%40N00&album_search=1&view_all=1

Reply
Dec 27, 2015 20:12:52   #
debbie wrazen Loc: Western New York
 
Love these. The top looks like the artist, Norman Rockwell. I've never seen this one in any compilations of his work so very cool.

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Dec 27, 2015 20:19:58   #
lightcatcher Loc: Farmington, NM (4 corners)
 
May like these..
http://www.theguardian.com/business/gallery/2012/jan/19/eastman-kodak-history-pictures#/?picture=384675390&index=3

http://www.pinterest.com/search/pins/?rs=ac&len=2&q=kodak+film&term_meta[]=kodak|autocomplete|2&term_meta[]=film|autocomplete|2

http://www.pinterest.com/search/pins/?q=kodak&rs=remove&term_meta[]=kodak|autocomplete|2&remove_refine=film|autocomplete|2

Reply
Dec 27, 2015 20:27:11   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
Love them pixelmaster.

Lightcatcher, memories.......

Reply
Dec 27, 2015 22:09:02   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
Too bad Kodak's management wasn't as good as their ads.

Reply
Dec 27, 2015 22:23:35   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
LFingar wrote:
Too bad Kodak's management wasn't as good as their ads.


The only mistake they made was hanging their hats of film being the path to the future. Minor misdealing of the odds.

Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Dec 27, 2015 23:27:53   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
The Good Old Film Days.
Pixelmaster wrote:
I have always liked the old Kodak ads. Here are two of them.

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 04:28:05   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 05:43:17   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
davidrb wrote:
The only mistake they made was hanging their hats of film being the path to the future. Minor misdealing of the odds.


The only mistake they made was not being forward thinking. Major misdealing of how technology works.

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 06:16:03   #
buddah17 Loc: The Bahamas
 
No...
The BIGGEST mistake they made was INVENTING digital photography, then "shelving" it for "as long as they thought their film cash cow" would carry them.
Allowing others to get into the digital market before them, then holding on stubbornly to film technology for as long as they thought they could, before embracing digital...
I'm an ex Kodak Distributor and I remember coming back home from the first photo convention in Las Vegas that featured 1 hour Labs, and telling my father (President of our company,) what great technology it was, and how we needed to get into it immediately. Only for Kodak to tell him that the 1 hour lab was a "passing fad" and we should hold on to our bulk processing lab as it would continue to be the main drive in the photofinishing industry.
I don't know WHO use to do the market trends analysis for them, but I do remember that Kodak always portrayed an arrogant "know it all" attitude regarding their knowledge of the future of the photographic industry. They ended up either reacting too late, (instant photography, 1 hour Labs, Digital,) OR ended up placing too much money into misguided products, such as the Kodak Disc Camera, or Digital camera with lesser features than the public wanted, such as pixel count.
My company was one of the first to get our hands on the disc camera, and right away we knew there was a big problem. The negative was VERY small, and the film speed too fast, resulting in a VERY grainy image. (We suggested that they advertise the printing of the negatives not to be larger than a 3.5 X 5. They (initially) insisted that it could be up to 5 X 7.
The sad thing is that their T-Grain technology was available and would have made the negative and resulting print much more pleasing to the eye.

LFingar wrote:
The only mistake they made was not being forward thinking. Major misdealing of how technology works.

Reply
 
 
Dec 28, 2015 06:41:05   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
buddah17 wrote:
No...
The BIGGEST mistake they made was INVENTING digital photography, then "shelving" it for "as long as they thought their film cash cow" would carry them.
Allowing others to get into the digital market before them, then holding on stubbornly to film technology for as long as they thought they could, before embracing digital...
I'm an ex Kodak Distributor and I remember coming back home from the first photo convention in Las Vegas that featured 1 hour Labs, and telling my father (President of our company,) what great technology it was, and how we needed to get into it immediately. Only for Kodak to tell him that the 1 hour lab was a "passing fad" and we should hold on to our bulk processing lab as it would continue to be the main drive in the photofinishing industry.
I don't know WHO use to do the market trends analysis for them, but I do remember that Kodak always portrayed an arrogant "know it all" attitude regarding their knowledge of the future of the photographic industry. They ended up either reacting too late, (instant photography, 1 hour Labs, Digital,) OR ended up placing too much money into misguided products, such as the Kodak Disc Camera, or Digital camera with lesser features than the public wanted, such as pixel count.
My company was one of the first to get our hands on the disc camera, and right away we knew there was a big problem. The negative was VERY small, and the film speed too fast, resulting in a VERY grainy image. (We suggested that they advertise the printing of the negatives not to be larger than a 3.5 X 5. They (initially) insisted that it could be up to 5 X 7.
The sad thing is that their T-Grain technology was available and would have made the negative and resulting print much more pleasing to the eye.
No... br The BIGGEST mistake they made was INVENT... (show quote)


As I stated, they weren't forward thinking and ignored the fact that embryonic technologies usually mature and become the new standard. You could just call it corporate arrogance or entrenched old guard attitude. It wasn't just Kodak. The Detroit Big Three automakers pretty much set the standard for such ignorance and arrogance. Be thankful for foreign competition or we would still be driving junk cars and digital wouldn't be near what it is today.

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 07:09:01   #
buddah17 Loc: The Bahamas
 
Or for domestic bail outs to keep automakers and the banking industry to "..keep on keeping on!"
Happy Holidays...

LFingar wrote:
As I stated, they weren't forward thinking and ignored the fact that embryonic technologies usually mature and become the new standard. You could just call it corporate arrogance or entrenched old guard attitude. It wasn't just Kodak. The Detroit Big Three automakers pretty much set the standard for such ignorance and arrogance. Be thankful for foreign competition or we would still be driving junk cars and digital wouldn't be near what it is today.

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 07:40:18   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
1/2 of my family are retired from Kodak, as we all lived in the Rochester, NY area.

Reply
Dec 28, 2015 08:03:06   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
buddah17 wrote:
No...
The BIGGEST mistake they made was INVENTING digital photography, then "shelving" it for "as long as they thought their film cash cow" would carry them.
Allowing others to get into the digital market before them, then holding on stubbornly to film technology for as long as they thought they could, before embracing digital...
I'm an ex Kodak Distributor and I remember coming back home from the first photo convention in Las Vegas that featured 1 hour Labs, and telling my father (President of our company,) what great technology it was, and how we needed to get into it immediately. Only for Kodak to tell him that the 1 hour lab was a "passing fad" and we should hold on to our bulk processing lab as it would continue to be the main drive in the photofinishing industry.
I don't know WHO use to do the market trends analysis for them, but I do remember that Kodak always portrayed an arrogant "know it all" attitude regarding their knowledge of the future of the photographic industry. They ended up either reacting too late, (instant photography, 1 hour Labs, Digital,) OR ended up placing too much money into misguided products, such as the Kodak Disc Camera, or Digital camera with lesser features than the public wanted, such as pixel count.
My company was one of the first to get our hands on the disc camera, and right away we knew there was a big problem. The negative was VERY small, and the film speed too fast, resulting in a VERY grainy image. (We suggested that they advertise the printing of the negatives not to be larger than a 3.5 X 5. They (initially) insisted that it could be up to 5 X 7.
The sad thing is that their T-Grain technology was available and would have made the negative and resulting print much more pleasing to the eye.
No... br b The BIGGEST mistake they made was INV... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: I was a Kodak pro product dealer and my thoughts parallel yours. On the other hand their photo business was all that the general public new or cared about while their Eastman chemical business is still going strong. Or at least it was the last time I checked

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.