Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Price of printer ink
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Dec 10, 2015 17:31:13   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
Yesterday I purchased a little Canon PIXMA printer, with cartridges, for $34 plus change at my local Walmart. In the next aisle they sold various printer cartridges. The two cartridges for this printer would have totaled $40 plus change. Who wudda known? I don't know if this is an issue for high end printers or not because I have prints made commercially.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 17:48:55   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
jackm1943 wrote:
Yesterday I purchased a little Canon PIXMA printer, with cartridges, for $34 plus change at my local Walmart. In the next aisle they sold various printer cartridges. The two cartridges for this printer would have totaled $40 plus change. Who wudda known? I don't know if this is an issue for high end printers or not because I have prints made commercially.


All the printer companies do it. They sell the printers at or below cost as "loss leaders" then make their money on ink cartridges. It is why so many people who do their own printing use third party ink. But you have to be careful which brand, some of it is junk. I use Precision Color, they get their ink for their cartridges from a company that makes ink for the OEMs and large commercial printing companies. Some people rate that ink as better than some of the inks in Brand Name Cartridges.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 17:49:46   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
This is exactly what EVERYBODY complains about!

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2015 17:52:37   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
It is not the price of the cartridge, but the price of the print that counts. And, it is very hard to calculate. A company called Red River Papers makes their living selling photo print paper. To establish actual costs they printed a huge number of standard prints on a variety of photo printers and counted ink cartridges used.

In the end, it did vary some by brand. But, the average cost per print comes out about the same as prints from "quality" printing services.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 17:59:17   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
robertjerl wrote:
All the printer companies do it. They sell the printers at or below cost as "loss leaders" then make their money on ink cartridges. It is why so many people who do their own printing use third party ink. But you have to be careful which brand, some of it is junk. I use Precision Color, they get their ink for their cartridges from a company that makes ink for the OEMs and large commercial printing companies. Some people rate that ink as better than some of the inks in Brand Name Cartridges.
All the printer companies do it. They sell the pr... (show quote)

I guess at this time I will just look for new printers instead of replacing cartridges if they keep making these offers. :shock:

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 18:00:15   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
cjc2 wrote:
This is exactly what EVERYBODY complains about!

Thanks Chris, it's one of the reasons I don't print at home.
JackM

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 18:04:12   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
bsprague wrote:
It is not the price of the cartridge, but the price of the print that counts. And, it is very hard to calculate. A company called Red River Papers makes their living selling photo print paper. To establish actual costs they printed a huge number of standard prints on a variety of photo printers and counted ink cartridges used.

In the end, it did vary some by brand. But, the average cost per print comes out about the same as prints from "quality" printing services.

Thanks Bill. I'm not trying to use this little printer for photo prints, just simple household use. I send out for photo prints because for me it less expensive. My old brain is maxed out with Photoshop, no room left to understand the intricacies of printers and printing.
JackM

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2015 18:04:24   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
cjc2 wrote:
This is exactly what EVERYBODY complains about!


Not me!

On a good month I might get a dozen prints worth putting on the wall in a frame. In reality, probably half that. Even if the price of the ink doubled, it would make a noticeable difference in my photography life style.

I might go so far as to say that if it really rates as a "wall hanger", I jump for joy at getting the best ink my money can buy!

On the other hand, if I was trying to compete with Costco in the volume printing business for a profit, I might complain.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 18:05:32   #
tomc601 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
Canon sells their printers with starter cartridges now. They're supposedly good for 80 pages of text.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 18:06:48   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
jackm1943 wrote:
Thanks Chris, it's one of the reasons I don't print at home.
JackM


Personally, I think there are some distinct advantages of printing at home which, for me, make the process worth it. This starts with total control being in your hands and goes on to include things like the ability to choose, or try different papers! With all most of us have invested in what we love to do, it doesn't seem to me that a reasonably priced printer add that much more. Additionally, one is able to make prints when desired or requested. Again, personally, I choose to limit my output size to 13" x 19" and go outside for anything larger. Works for me, and I enjoy it! (Mostly!)

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 18:16:42   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
jackm1943 wrote:
Thanks Bill. I'm not trying to use this little printer for photo prints, just simple household use. I send out for photo prints because for me it less expensive. My old brain is maxed out with Photoshop, no room left to understand the intricacies of printers and printing.
JackM
Different story! And, I must make a confession....
Printer 1 is in my wife's room/office. It is a Brother Laser that we bought when an old HP all-in-one broke a hinge. It prints B&W really cheap. The high yield toner cartridges, are about $50 but can do a couple thousand pages and prints both sides to save paper.

Printer 2 is a Epson all-in-one ink jet in my room/office. It works well if we have to have color prints and for copies. It does have an optional high capacity black cartridge that lowers the cost of copies.

Printer 3 is a Canon optimized for photo prints. As I wrote, I don't care that it is expensive to use. It is competitive with photo print services even though the price per ink cartridge is hight.

All three printers were purchased on "deals" and were not much more than what you paid.

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2015 18:17:48   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
tomc601 wrote:
Canon sells their printers with starter cartridges now. They're supposedly good for 80 pages of text.
The Canon photo printers like the Pro-100 come with "regular" cartridges.

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 19:02:32   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
cjc2 wrote:
Personally, I think there are some distinct advantages of printing at home which, for me, make the process worth it. This starts with total control being in your hands and goes on to include things like the ability to choose, or try different papers! With all most of us have invested in what we love to do, it doesn't seem to me that a reasonably priced printer add that much more. Additionally, one is able to make prints when desired or requested. Again, personally, I choose to limit my output size to 13" x 19" and go outside for anything larger. Works for me, and I enjoy it! (Mostly!)
Personally, I think there are some distinct advant... (show quote)


I can certainly relate to this train of thought. For many of us, producing a gallery quality print of our images is an important part of the total photographic experience, that simply cannot be matched by having a lab do the printing. And, despite the high cost of OEM inks, if one uses quality art papers, the cost of home printing is actually far less. A 13x19 print on Moab Lasal Exhibition Luster will run you $52.30 at BayPhoto. The same print, on the same paper, using Canon OEM inks and printed at home costs a small fraction of that. And by printing at home, I can "massage" the print a number of times to get it "just right" in a single work session, with no running back and forth to the (not so local) Costco, or having to wait for days for a lab shipment each time I adjust the image.

The one time I do find labs (or Costco or Walgrens) to have an advantage is the time where I want to print out a double set of 150 4x6 vacation snapshots. In that case the high volume printers offer a price that is difficult to beat, and with far less time and effort expended.

Large prints, for most people are probably best done by labs, unless you have a need to do a fairly high volume of printing ( for instance, if you sell prints like I do). What is interesting is that wide format printer (say 17" and wider) the ink tanks are way larger than most desktop printers and the cost per ml of ink is <50% of the cost per ml on a standard 13" photo printer!

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 19:10:32   #
tomvanb Loc: Anthem, AZ
 
and didn't Kodak sell cameras cheap so they could sell film? Tom

Reply
Dec 10, 2015 22:17:11   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
And they all do it. Look at razors. Tesla on their car don't have oil to change so they have a "Checkup" for each year at $600 to maintain the warranty. I gave up on home printing because of the cost of cartridges. For a while I would refill my own with kit that included all you needed. I use Costco. Upload and pickup in an hour.
tomvanb wrote:
and didn't Kodak sell cameras cheap so they could sell film? Tom

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.