Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 16--140 or 16--300?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 8, 2015 21:41:31   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 21:51:57   #
jethro779 Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)




I think you mean the 18-140 & the 18-300. The only 16-300 I know about says Tamron on it.

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 22:08:25   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
jethro779 wrote:
I think you mean the 18-140 & the 18-300. The only 16-300 I know about says Tamron on it.


Yes, typo on my part. Those are the ones.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2015 23:50:03   #
LarryFB Loc: Depends where our RV is parked
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)


Ignoring the mistakes in the lenses, I would recommend the 18 - 140. I have and use the Nikjon 18-140 as a walk around lens and am very happy with it. I also have a Nikon 55-300 which I do use on occasion (e.g. birding, or wildlife) and it does a good job.

Frankly, the 18-140 has taken the role of a general purpose lens, while the 55-300 is now a special purpose lens.

My 18-55 lens has be relegated to a "do I really need this" lens!

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 00:03:10   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
The 18--140 is looking better and better.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 06:50:12   #
Jahawk Loc: Rhode Island
 
LarryFB wrote:
Ignoring the mistakes in the lenses, I would recommend the 18 - 140. I have and use the Nikjon 18-140 as a walk around lens and am very happy with it. I also have a Nikon 55-300 which I do use on occasion (e.g. birding, or wildlife) and it does a good job.

Frankly, the 18-140 has taken the role of a general purpose lens, while the 55-300 is now a special purpose lens.

My 18-55 lens has be relegated to a "do I really need this" lens!



:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 08:11:36   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)


Moo. Now there is a special on a D750 with a 18-140 that would cost less than a D7200 and a 18-140

Reply
 
 
Dec 9, 2015 08:42:49   #
mymike Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Love my 18 -140.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 08:59:50   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
billnikon wrote:
Moo. Now there is a special on a D750 with a 18-140 that would cost less than a D7200 and a 18-140


Perhaps you could enlighten us as to WHERE this wonderful, obviously grey market, bargain can be had?

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 10:21:46   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Try some comparisons.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/lenses
http://lenshero.com/lens-comparison
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx
http://www.lenstip.com/lenses.html
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 10:57:11   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Perhaps you could enlighten us as to WHERE this wonderful, obviously grey market, bargain can be had?


Come on man. B&h

Reply
 
 
Dec 9, 2015 11:01:23   #
jaybyrd Loc: Oceanside, CA
 
I have had the tamron 24-300 and 18-270. Size and weight were ok, but was not pleased with the IQ. Have had the Nikon 18-140 for about 2 years and it lives on my D7000. The IQ is excellent. My favorite lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:01:47   #
jaybyrd Loc: Oceanside, CA
 
I have had the tamron 24-300 and 18-270. Size and weight were ok, but was not pleased with the IQ. Have had the Nikon 18-140 for about 2 years and it lives on my D7000. The IQ is excellent. My favorite lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:04:09   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
So far, good stuff, and the 18--140 seems to be a clear winner here. But what about the 18--300? No one's mentioned that one. I'm thinking that one would cover the whole spectrum, but if it's not that great a performer, I wouldn't be above picking up something like a good, sharp 70--300 lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:07:50   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
sister in law has the 18 to 300 and loves it, almost never takes it off , If your doing a lot of nature photography this is the one to choose.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.