Unless you do a lot of low-light stuff, or tend to use large apertures very often, the 1.8G should be sufficient. More affordable, too. Typically, what range of aperture settings do you use for your photography?
Unless you do a lot of low-light stuff, or tend to use large apertures very often, the 1.8G should be sufficient. More affordable, too. Typically, what range of aperture settings do you use for your photography?
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks
If I was only shooting digital, I'd opt for the 1.8. Since I also shoot 35mm film, I chose the 1.4 because one can't change ISO setting with film as easily as with digital.
If you find yourself in a bit too dark a setting you can always up the ISO a notch or two. --Bob
If I was only shooting digital, I'd opt for the 1.8. Since I also shoot 35mm film, I chose the 1.4 because one can't change ISO setting with film as easily as with digital.
If you find yourself in a bit too dark a setting you can always up the ISO a notch or two. --Bob
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks
I own both lenses, the f/1.8G is a simpler design, lighter, focuses a little faster (IMO), and is better at wide (f/1.8-f/2.8) apertures. The f/1.4G is a better overall performer (especially above f/4) on a full frame body. On an APS-C sensor body the f/1.8G is an easy choice, on a full frame it depends on how and what you plan to shoot.
Thanks to all for your comments. Still thinking but maybe leaning towards the 1.4 . Why, :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :) . Will never regret.
Although its new and Ihavent done a lot with it yet, I have a 1.8g and so far no complaints. I figured if it really gets dark I can move up the ISO a bit.
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks