Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 50mm 1.8g or 1.4g
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 7, 2015 17:55:06   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 18:08:44   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Unless you do a lot of low-light stuff, or tend to use large apertures very often, the 1.8G should be sufficient. More affordable, too. Typically, what range of aperture settings do you use for your photography?

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 18:09:59   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
3.5
rook2c4 wrote:
Unless you do a lot of low-light stuff, or tend to use large apertures very often, the 1.8G should be sufficient. More affordable, too. Typically, what range of aperture settings do you use for your photography?

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2015 18:15:43   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks


If I was only shooting digital, I'd opt for the 1.8. Since I also shoot 35mm film, I chose the 1.4 because one can't change ISO setting with film as easily as with digital.

If you find yourself in a bit too dark a setting you can always up the ISO a notch or two.
--Bob

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 18:33:30   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
avemal wrote:
3.5


End of story. F/1.8 for half the price. :-D

I went with the 1.8 because I rarely shoot wide open.

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 19:12:51   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
Thanks for your input. Allan
rmalarz wrote:
If I was only shooting digital, I'd opt for the 1.8. Since I also shoot 35mm film, I chose the 1.4 because one can't change ISO setting with film as easily as with digital.

If you find yourself in a bit too dark a setting you can always up the ISO a notch or two.
--Bob

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 19:53:31   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
OddJobber wrote:
End of story. F/1.8 for half the price. :-D

I went with the 1.8 because I rarely shoot wide open.



Same here: I'm waiting on a 50/1.8…. The extra stop is 3x the $s. In some cases I'm might do that-- but not this time

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2015 20:04:01   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
If you do decide on the f/1.4, buy the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens instead. Superior in all respects. $949.

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 20:51:34   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
It is hard to spend 400.00 on the Nikon. Thanks, Allanm
CaptainC wrote:
If you do decide on the f/1.4, buy the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens instead. Superior in all respects. $949.

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 22:30:03   #
BebuLamar
 
I always bought the f/1.4 or f/2 and not the f/1.2 or f/1.8 because I dislike the in between stop of f/1.8 and f/1.2. Yeah I am nuts.

But besides that if you want thin DOF then the f/1.4 gives you less DOF. For low light f/1.8 and f/1.4 are not that much of a difference.

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 05:35:59   #
bruswen Loc: Eugene OR
 
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks


I own both lenses, the f/1.8G is a simpler design, lighter, focuses a little faster (IMO), and is better at wide (f/1.8-f/2.8) apertures. The f/1.4G is a better overall performer (especially above f/4) on a full frame body. On an APS-C sensor body the f/1.8G is an easy choice, on a full frame it depends on how and what you plan to shoot.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2015 05:42:24   #
Hammer Loc: London UK
 
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks


Hi,

I have used both (courtesy of a friend ) , I have the 1.4 , friend has the 1.8.

The 1.4 is slightly softer up to about f4 , nice for portraits of oldies like me . However this can be achieved in PP.

The 1.8 is sharp all the way , tack sharp, so seems to be the best overall option unless you are desperate for a bit more light.

1.8 seems be the best choice overall and as a bonus its cheaper !

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 06:09:58   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
Thanks to all for your comments. Still thinking but maybe leaning towards the 1.4 . Why, :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :) . Will never regret.

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 07:01:20   #
GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Although its new and Ihavent done a lot with it yet, I have a 1.8g and so far no complaints. I figured if it really gets dark I can move up the ISO a bit.

avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 07:10:23   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks


Buy the 58mm 1.4.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.