Panoramas- most number of images you've stitched into one?
Dec 5, 2015 10:24:44 #
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Dec 5, 2015 10:30:20 #
300+ (2007)
I probably need to restitch it since the software has improved so much.
I shot that manually and live to regret it.
I probably need to restitch it since the software has improved so much.
I shot that manually and live to regret it.
Dec 5, 2015 10:33:21 #
30. It was 6 sets of 5 multiple exposures for an HDR pano inside and ancient church in Copenhagen.
Dec 5, 2015 10:38:41 #
Rongnongno wrote:
300+ (2007)
I probably need to restitch it since the software has improved so much.
I shot that manually and live to regret it.
I probably need to restitch it since the software has improved so much.
I shot that manually and live to regret it.
Wouldn't you want to shoot that in M for purposes of consistency?
Dec 5, 2015 10:50:47 #
Peeb wrote:
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
I have played with, and continue to take pano's at every chance I get since discovering how relatively easy it really is.... a 25 shot vertical handheld (actually all my panos have been handheld) usually shot on manual.
A selection can be seen here if interested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/
Dec 5, 2015 10:54:25 #
Peeb wrote:
Wouldn't you want to shoot that in M for purposes of consistency?
Oh, I should have used 'handheld'.
It was shot on A-Mode, manual focus and I broke several rules like changing the focus... I used a D300.
My file format was... argh... JPG. I was not even remotely aware of how good raw was.
Dec 5, 2015 11:40:55 #
Dngallagher wrote:
I have played with, and continue to take pano's at every chance I get since discovering how relatively easy it really is.... a 25 shot vertical handheld (actually all my panos have been handheld) usually shot on manual.
A selection can be seen here if interested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/
A selection can be seen here if interested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/
I think the indoor arena, the beaches, and the brick walk were my favorites. Excellent!
Dec 5, 2015 12:08:53 #
Peeb wrote:
I think the indoor arena, the beaches, and the brick walk were my favorites. Excellent!
Thanks - I am always amazed just how simple a task it really is, and tend to see pano's everywhere when I shoot now ;)
Dec 5, 2015 20:19:28 #
Peeb wrote:
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
i dont have to stitche my camera has a pano mode..
Dec 5, 2015 21:02:15 #
Peeb wrote:
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
I haven't seen a limiting factor for this yet. Did a night shot of Stars using a 200mm lens. Three rows of 3 and it came out perfect. And I have seen even more than this, but if you have the ground showing, you have to watch out for ghosting.
You will need to download to see how this turned out. The stars are too tiny otherwise. I did not use stacking on this, so you can see tiny star trails.
Dec 5, 2015 21:46:30 #
Peeb wrote:
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
147 (7 HDR x 21) Total file finished 2Gb Print size 150" x 10" @300dpi. Should have shot in portrait instead of landscape but the results were amazing.
Dec 6, 2015 06:05:51 #
Peeb wrote:
I experimented a bit because it belatedly occurred to me that you should be able to stitch images together BOTH vertically AND horizontally in the same image.
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
Tried it, and it worked in PSE. Made a pic that was 4x2 (4 wide, by two tall), for a total of 8 parts. Shot in RAW with a 24 megapixel sensor, so the file size was ginormous.
What's YOUR record?
7
Dec 6, 2015 09:03:26 #
JimH123 wrote:
I haven't seen a limiting factor for this yet. Did a night shot of Stars using a 200mm lens. Three rows of 3 and it came out perfect. And I have seen even more than this, but if you have the ground showing, you have to watch out for ghosting.
You will need to download to see how this turned out. The stars are too tiny otherwise. I did not use stacking on this, so you can see tiny star trails.
You will need to download to see how this turned out. The stars are too tiny otherwise. I did not use stacking on this, so you can see tiny star trails.
Can you describe briefly how to use stacking to accomplish this?
Dec 6, 2015 09:03:59 #
par4fore wrote:
147 (7 HDR x 21) Total file finished 2Gb Print size 150" x 10" @300dpi. Should have shot in portrait instead of landscape but the results were amazing.
Amazing! What was your subject?
Dec 6, 2015 09:23:45 #
Dngallagher wrote:
I have played with, and continue to take pano's at every chance I get since discovering how relatively easy it really is.... a 25 shot vertical handheld (actually all my panos have been handheld) usually shot on manual.
A selection can be seen here if interested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/
A selection can be seen here if interested.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dongallagher/albums/72157631114585642/with/20274345128/
Great selection! I adore panos, but how do you do it with people, don't they move?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.