F*****t progressive movement trying to hammer all who disagree
Dec 2, 2015 08:11:05 #
...... with them. Their little, narrow minds are working overtime!
"Schneiderman attacks Exxon, tries to criminalize climate doubt"
Eric Schneiderman, New York's Attorney General, has launched an investigation of Exxon Mobil. But it isn't your typical investigation. He is demanding documents going all the way back to 1970, when g****l c*****g was still the popular environmental scare, that would show the company knew about g****l w*****g and failed to warn its investors.
Or so it seems. After all, this probe is supposed to be secret. But in the long tradition of politically ambitious New York attorneys general, Schneiderman has made sure the public knows just enough to assume guilt and support his crusade.
The apparent theory is that the oil giant defrauded investors by feigning ignorance about how global c*****e c****e could affect its profits. Even as it did so, it was funding opposition to green c*****e c****e policies.
The evidence? What is known at this point is that the company observed rising temperatures at its Arctic drilling sites decades ago. It responded by devising strategies for how to cope with or even benefit from worst-case changes in temperatures and w*****r p*****ns.
"Schneiderman attacks Exxon, tries to criminalize climate doubt"
Eric Schneiderman, New York's Attorney General, has launched an investigation of Exxon Mobil. But it isn't your typical investigation. He is demanding documents going all the way back to 1970, when g****l c*****g was still the popular environmental scare, that would show the company knew about g****l w*****g and failed to warn its investors.
Or so it seems. After all, this probe is supposed to be secret. But in the long tradition of politically ambitious New York attorneys general, Schneiderman has made sure the public knows just enough to assume guilt and support his crusade.
The apparent theory is that the oil giant defrauded investors by feigning ignorance about how global c*****e c****e could affect its profits. Even as it did so, it was funding opposition to green c*****e c****e policies.
The evidence? What is known at this point is that the company observed rising temperatures at its Arctic drilling sites decades ago. It responded by devising strategies for how to cope with or even benefit from worst-case changes in temperatures and w*****r p*****ns.
Dec 2, 2015 08:48:23 #
Cykdelic wrote:
...... with them. Their little, narrow minds are w... (show quote)
Minds working overtime???
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
Dec 2, 2015 08:50:47 #
Cykdelic wrote:
...... with them. Their little, narrow minds are working overtime!
I love the Washington Examiner's logo title utilizing a font reminiscent of the N**i Party. Fitting :)
Dec 2, 2015 08:52:58 #
greymule wrote:
Minds working overtime???
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
Oh but that is serious stuff compared to the climate of the entire Earth and all that live here! Regressive's is a most appropriate title for them!
Dec 2, 2015 09:07:08 #
Cykdelic wrote:
...... with them. Their little, narrow minds are w... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Good post.
Dec 2, 2015 09:24:44 #
Twardlow
Loc: Arkansas
Cykdelic wrote:
...... with them. Their little, narrow minds are w... (show quote)
The man is NOT trying to criminalize 'climate doubt.' You have that wrong. The company may have found profound c*****e c****e, then may have defrauded its own investors, by withholding that information. The is not 'climate doubt,' but failing to act or 'climate t***h.' That, if true, could be a criminal act, similar to cigarette companies learning that smoking causes cancer, withholding that information, and continuing to sell a cancer-causing product to innocent customers.
"It responded by devising strategies for how to cope with or even benefit from worst-case changes in temperatures and w*****r p*****ns." This is no so, that they merely devised strategies to cope or benefit, but that they may have withheld information detrimental to their business, misleading investors, thereby manipulating the market.
This may or may not be true, which is why an investigation is necessary, a secret investigation because information should not be released that is not true.
Sounds to me like things are well in hand, and if the investigation proves wrongdoing, the company did profound damage to its investors and to the public in general.
Time will tell.
Dec 2, 2015 09:47:11 #
Twardlow wrote:
The man is NOT trying to criminalize 'climate doub... (show quote)
Well stated.
I would like to add that the term "F*****t progressive movement", makes no sense. It seems either the meaning of the word "f*****t" or the word "progressive" is unknown to the op.
Dec 2, 2015 09:51:00 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
I may be mistaken, but I think a more accurate term is reactionaryOh but that is serious stuff compared to the climate of the entire Earth and all that live here! Regressive's is a most appropriate title for them!
"A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that he or she thinks are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante.[1]
Political reactionaries are at the right-wing of a political spectrum; yet, reactionary ideologies can be radical, in the sense of political extremism, in service to re-establishing the status quo ante."
Dec 2, 2015 09:54:39 #
green wrote:
I may be mistaken, but I think a more accurate ter... (show quote)
No in this case I think that they do not want to return to what most think of as status quo. They want to regress to the stone age it often seems. Kind of like ISIS.......
Dec 2, 2015 10:06:14 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
devolve?No in this case I think that they do not want to return to what most think of as status quo. They want to regress to the stone age it often seems. Kind of like ISIS.......
Dec 2, 2015 10:08:41 #
green wrote:
devolve?
YES! They want Fred, Barney and the Royal Order of the Water Buffalo as our way of life :)
Dec 2, 2015 10:25:41 #
greymule wrote:
Minds working overtime???
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
Well put...and over the heads that are in the sand, so to speak, on this board.
Dec 2, 2015 11:19:42 #
greymule wrote:
Minds working overtime???
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
You mean like the B******i hearings, the PP hearings? You call out "progressives". Don't we need progress? The Republicans are party of regressives?? Regressive means less advanced. Is that really where this country should be headed?? Going backwards while the rest of the world moves forward with its approach to dire problems facing the world??
Well, you drank kook-aid........the joke is that the f*****t democrat party of today tries to call itself progressive! I didn't expect you to get it.
Yes, B******i hearings and others represent the open, free speech of America. The Democrats, f*****ts that they are, want to point out and stifle free speech.
The NY i***t wants to bring charges against those who don't support the idiocy of the GWT.
Others, such as our college campuses, don't allow for opposite views.
What's next.......internment camps for free market supporters?
Dec 2, 2015 11:24:18 #
Frosty wrote:
Well stated.
I would like to add that the term "F*****t progressive movement", makes no sense. It seems either the meaning of the word "f*****t" or the word "progressive" is unknown to the op.
I would like to add that the term "F*****t progressive movement", makes no sense. It seems either the meaning of the word "f*****t" or the word "progressive" is unknown to the op.
Well, you might want to review your recent history.
"Progressives were generally enthusiastic about socialist movements in the Soviet Union and Europe, they were also overwhelmingly supportive of the f*****t movements in Italy and Germany during the 1920s and 1930s. The founding fathers of modern liberalism, the men and women who laid the intellectual groundwork of the New Deal and the welfare state, thought that f*****m sounded like ... a worthwhile 'experiment'
This is an extremely accurate statement.
Dec 2, 2015 11:24:42 #
Cykdelic, what is the source of your post? Why should we believe it without attribution? Or is the author too embarrassed to own it?
BTW, please review your history. Theodore Roosevelt, often beloved by "conservatives" for his "speak softly but carry a big stick" and a muscular foreign policy, ran for President as .... wait for it .... here it comes! Founded the National Progressive Party! Yes!
Here's a source: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/theodore-roosevelt-progressive-crusader
I find odd your linkage of f*****t and progressive. Is this your personal opinion? Please explain.
BTW, please review your history. Theodore Roosevelt, often beloved by "conservatives" for his "speak softly but carry a big stick" and a muscular foreign policy, ran for President as .... wait for it .... here it comes! Founded the National Progressive Party! Yes!
Here's a source: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/theodore-roosevelt-progressive-crusader
I find odd your linkage of f*****t and progressive. Is this your personal opinion? Please explain.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.